|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Planets in the solar system
Hi guys
Can someone tell me a bit more exactly what is the total percentage for the mass of the planets in our solar system and since I am assuming it's about 1% (or mabye even less???) or just about, how can we use the gravity assist for satellites if the Sun composes the other 99% of the mass in our solar system. If i understand this gravity assist concept, then shouldn't the ever massive Sun alter the voyages of the satellites or is it taken into account depending on the destinatons of our satellies. Also can someone kind of expand a bit more about this gravity assist thing for me a bit. Thanks guys. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If i understand this gravity assist concept, then shouldn't the ever
massive Sun alter the voyages of the satellites or is it taken into account The gravitational force is proportional to the distance between two bodies. Closer = stronger/ further = weaker. It falls off fast (inverse square law) , but it doesn't reach zero. This is why we stick to the Earth and are not dragged screaming to a fiery doom in the heart of a fusion reactor ;-) As a probe approaches another planet/body it gets pulled in, like a freefall parachutist on Earth. It picks up kinetic (?) gravitational ? not sure) energy as it accelerates and keeps that energy as it leaves. jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If i understand this gravity assist concept, then shouldn't the ever
massive Sun alter the voyages of the satellites or is it taken into account The gravitational force is proportional to the distance between two bodies. Closer = stronger/ further = weaker. It falls off fast (inverse square law) , but it doesn't reach zero. This is why we stick to the Earth and are not dragged screaming to a fiery doom in the heart of a fusion reactor ;-) As a probe approaches another planet/body it gets pulled in, like a freefall parachutist on Earth. It picks up kinetic (?) gravitational ? not sure) energy as it accelerates and keeps that energy as it leaves. jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The slingshot analogy seems to be widely misunderstood by the general
public. The spacecraft is briefly swept along by the planet and picks up some of its orbital velocity. A spacecraft that starts out in orbit around the sun can't get a gravity assist from it. The gravitational acceleration going in will be exactly balanced by the decelaration going out. Try "gravity-assisted orbits" in Google. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... If i understand this gravity assist concept, then shouldn't the ever massive Sun alter the voyages of the satellites or is it taken into account The gravitational force is proportional to the distance between two bodies. Closer = stronger/ further = weaker. It falls off fast (inverse square law) , but it doesn't reach zero. This is why we stick to the Earth and are not dragged screaming to a fiery doom in the heart of a fusion reactor ;-) As a probe approaches another planet/body it gets pulled in, like a freefall parachutist on Earth. It picks up kinetic (?) gravitational ? not sure) energy as it accelerates and keeps that energy as it leaves. jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The slingshot analogy seems to be widely misunderstood by the general
public. The spacecraft is briefly swept along by the planet and picks up some of its orbital velocity. A spacecraft that starts out in orbit around the sun can't get a gravity assist from it. The gravitational acceleration going in will be exactly balanced by the decelaration going out. Try "gravity-assisted orbits" in Google. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... If i understand this gravity assist concept, then shouldn't the ever massive Sun alter the voyages of the satellites or is it taken into account The gravitational force is proportional to the distance between two bodies. Closer = stronger/ further = weaker. It falls off fast (inverse square law) , but it doesn't reach zero. This is why we stick to the Earth and are not dragged screaming to a fiery doom in the heart of a fusion reactor ;-) As a probe approaches another planet/body it gets pulled in, like a freefall parachutist on Earth. It picks up kinetic (?) gravitational ? not sure) energy as it accelerates and keeps that energy as it leaves. jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The slingshot analogy seems to be
widely misunderstood by the general public. The spacecraft is briefly swept along by the planet and picks up some of its orbital velocity. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The slingshot analogy seems to be
widely misunderstood by the general public. The spacecraft is briefly swept along by the planet and picks up some of its orbital velocity. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
RATs!! Hit the 'Send' button by mistake.
The slingshot analogy seems to be widely misunderstood by the general public. The spacecraft is briefly swept along by the planet and picks up some of its orbital velocity. There is another aspect to the 'slingshot' boost as well. Per unit of distance traveled, less time is spent in the outbound leg than in the inbound leg. oc |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RATs!! Hit the 'Send' button by mistake.
The slingshot analogy seems to be widely misunderstood by the general public. The spacecraft is briefly swept along by the planet and picks up some of its orbital velocity. There is another aspect to the 'slingshot' boost as well. Per unit of distance traveled, less time is spent in the outbound leg than in the inbound leg. oc |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Zarkovic" wrote in message
news:U8udb.25634$O85.16491@pd7tw1no... Hi guys Can someone tell me a bit more exactly what is the total percentage for the mass of the planets in our solar system and since I am assuming it's about 1% (or mabye even less???) or just about, how can we use the gravity assist for satellites if the Sun composes the other 99% of the mass in our solar system. If i understand this gravity assist concept, then shouldn't the ever massive Sun alter the voyages of the satellites or is it taken into account depending on the destinatons of our satellies. Also can someone kind of expand a bit more about this gravity assist thing for me a bit. Thanks guys. To help you understand gravity assists, try visiting JPL's Basics of Space Flight, chapter 4: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf4-1.html . It's got a fairly easy to understand explanation of the concept, assuming you're familiar with some basics of vector algebra. Hope that helps a bit, cheers! -- The butler did it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How special is the Solar System? | Andrew Nowicki | SETI | 14 | September 3rd 04 04:38 AM |
How special is the Solar System? | Eric Chomko | Astronomy Misc | 7 | September 3rd 04 04:38 AM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
NASA Wants You to be a Solar System Ambassador | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | September 12th 03 01:32 AM |
ESA sees stardust storms heading for Solar System (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 27th 03 12:29 AM |