Why Rocky is a Conspiracy Nut

On Monday, December 2, 2013 6:06:57 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
After thinking about the following OP (below the ----) there is another

issue that proves the NIST report is unscientific and false.



NIST should have addressed the question about why did the Twin Towers float

up up and away before reaching the ground? See:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg



There are only three possibilities that I know of for such a behavior and

those a



1. Loads of super-thermate



2. A DEW



3. The 19 patsies were in possession of an anti-gravity machine or two and

once they turned it on it reeked havoc on anything it came near.



But I'm inclined to throw out #3 because I have trouble believing anything

our media force fed us on 9/11/01 about the patsies.



Still NIST avoided a very critical issue that would have saved hundreds of

thousands of lives of people in the Middle East.



OP below this line ---------------------



Over 1,000 Professional Architects and Engineers agree that the mysterious

collapses of WTC Building 7 and the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 need to be

re-examined and investigated. The NIST report is proven to be unscientific

and false, using evidence NIST either ignored or gathered and used itself.



Note: There are many many more comments on the video itself.



Why the NIST report on WTC7 is unscientific and false

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V0WQFztLyg



Rocky

You dropped your lithium tab again.