New LRO pic A14 different Sun Angle

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...ated.png******
WOW............Doc

On Aug 25, 5:38*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote: http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/LROCiotw/M104634241LE_annotated...*****
WOW............DocLink doesn't seem to work try LROC main page*
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/?archi...Fra-Mauro.html

On Aug 25, 2:38*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...otated...*****
WOW............Doc

Can you fix that link, or give us a better one?

~ BG

On Aug 25, 6:06*pm, OM wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:41:31 -0700 (PDT), "Dr.Colon Oscopy"

wrote:
On Aug 25, 5:38*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/LROCiotw/M104634241LE_annotated...****
WOW............DocLink doesn't seem to work try LROC main page*
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/?archi...covery-at-Fra-...

...It works, but you added a bunch of spaces after the .png.

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...41LE_annotated...

...Once again, the Moon Hoax Morons have been told to "eat it". And
LRO hasn't even gotten to its closest orbits yet!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *OM

--

* ]=====================================[
* ] * OMBlog -http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld* [
* ] * * * *Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* * * * * [
* ] * * * * *an obnoxious opinion in your day! * * * * * [
* ]=====================================[

Your purely subjective science is noted. When are we going to get
down to the original/raw objective science?

Why is the LROC dynamic range so **** poor?

Why is the Apollo moon average albedo 0.7+?

Why are the Apollo images showing a near whiteout (light gray)
terrain?

Was their unfiltered Kodak film sensitive to IR?

~ BG

Don't worry, man. We'll hear from those lunatics eventually. Though I'd
personally tell them to kiss off.....
"OM" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:41:31 -0700 (PDT), "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:

On Aug 25, 5:38 pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...41LE_annotated...
WOW............DocLink doesn't seem to work try LROC main page

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/?archi...y-at-Fra-Mauro.
html

...It works, but you added a bunch of spaces after the .png.

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload..._annotated.png

...Once again, the Moon Hoax Morons have been told to "eat it". And
LRO hasn't even gotten to its closest orbits yet!

OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On Aug 25, 8:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:38*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...notated...****
WOW............Doc

Can you fix that link, or give us a better one?

*~ BG

Observationologist? Is it Mars or is it or venus LOL look again
second post in this thread LOL LOL LOL LOL.................Doc

OM wrote:

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:28:22 -0700 (PDT), "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:

On Aug 25, 8:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:38*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...notated...****
WOW............Doc

Can you fix that link, or give us a better one?

*~ BG

Observationologist? Is it Mars or is it or venus LOL look again
second post in this thread LOL LOL LOL LOL.................Doc

...Actually, I've fixed your broken link, Doc. Just for Guthball,
although I suspect he'll find he's more familiar with it than he
currently realizes::

That crossed the line.

plonk

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

On Aug 26, 4:28*am, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:
On Aug 25, 8:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Aug 25, 2:38*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/upload...notated....***
WOW............Doc

Can you fix that link, or give us a better one?

*~ BG

Observationologist? *Is it Mars or is it or venus LOL look again
second post in this thread *LOL LOL LOL LOL.................Doc

There's nothing new or all that objective as to proving EVAs were
human or robotic. Remember, I've never once insisted that Apollo
technology didn't manage to get onto the lunar surface.

BTW, via LRO where's Venus? (it has more than one camera, and as such
is perfectly capable of looking at and above the horizon)

Of course during the entire LRO trek around Earth, to the moon and
getting itself into its close orbit was perhaps at least several
hundred opportunities of recording our physically dark moon along with
the planet Venus within the same FOV. So, what's the official excuse
(s) this time?

~ BG

~ BG

"BradGuth" babbled:

Observationologist? Is it Mars or is it or venus LOL look again
second post in this thread LOL LOL LOL LOL.................Doc

There's nothing new or all that objective as to proving EVAs were
human or robotic. Remember, I've never once insisted that Apollo
technology didn't manage to get onto the lunar surface.

BTW, via LRO where's Venus? (it has more than one camera, and as such
is perfectly capable of looking at and above the horizon)

Of course during the entire LRO trek around Earth, to the moon and
getting itself into its close orbit was perhaps at least several
hundred opportunities of recording our physically dark moon along with
the planet Venus within the same FOV. So, what's the official excuse
(s) this time?

+++++

Uh, it's not a mission priority?

T.B.

On Aug 26, 1:09*pm, "The Mighty T.B."
wrote:
"BradGuth" babbled:

Observationologist? Is it Mars or is it or venus LOL look again
second post in this thread LOL LOL LOL LOL.................Doc

There's nothing new or all that objective as to proving EVAs were
human or robotic. *Remember, I've never once insisted that Apollo
technology didn't manage to get onto the lunar surface.

BTW, *via LRO where's Venus? (it has more than one camera, and as such
is perfectly capable of looking at and above the horizon)

Of course during the entire LRO trek around Earth, to the moon and
getting itself into its close orbit was perhaps at least several
hundred opportunities of recording our physically dark moon along with
the planet Venus within the same FOV. * So, what's the official excuse
(s) this time?

+++++

Uh, it's not a mission priority?

T.B.

So what? It's a zero infringement upon any other science, plus
otherwise a 100% PR benefit, by showing us how a truly good and spendy
camera along with its quality lens can capture the extent of such
nifty dynamic range, as well as in vibrant hues/colors, and the
obviously much brighter item of Venus along with those deep mineral
and fluorescence colors of our naked and physically dark moon would
give us a much better idea of what that crystal dry and dusty surface
of our moon has to offer.

Even including Jupiter, Saturn or Mars would be impressive as all get
out, especially when depicted along with our physically dark moon
that's so unavoidably reactive to the UV.

Are you suggesting those LRO cameras are not as good as advertised,
and that we've paid dearly for?

~ BG