A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #231  
Old February 27th 06, 09:48 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
According to Dr. Yoon's new physics(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com). the sun

contains still a great amount of neutron, in respect to its average density
100g/cc.

Allegedly, neutron decomposes by β-decay to produce a proton and an
electron to build a hydrogen atom, releasing energy.


Not really. I suspect they'd both fly away in opposite directions.

Since inside of
the sun is a supercritical environment of ultra high temperature and
pressure, a proton produced by β-decay combines another neutron
nearby and it turns out to build a deuteron.


Except we've no proof protons are decaying in the sun.


Deuterons thus made are
also possible to bind themselves to construct a helium nucleus in such
a supercritical environment. Thus deutrons inside the sun becomes a
fundamental building block of 92 kinds of all the natural atomic nuclei
found on the earth.


Why invoke deuterium when you can make them with hydrogens?

  #232  
Old March 10th 06, 04:51 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
Dear Mr. Lloyd Parker! It appears you didn't hear about the structure
of Yoon's universal atomic model.


I heard. I also heard about polywater, about the earth being 6000 years old,
and about space aliens on earth. I tend to discount the National Enquirer
when it comes to science.


His atomic orbital electron of
hydrogen atom builds a persistent current ring constructed with
electric and magnetic force fluxes( in current physics these are field
lines). Neutron has the same structure as hydrogen atom, but only with
the persistent current ring extremely shrunk. Thus neutron has a higher
energy than hydrogen atom. Evidence is that neutron converts into a
hydrogen atom by beta-decay emitting energy. This persistent current
ring has an ultra high tenacity against the charge repulsion of number
of protons when it wraps them because it folds numerous times as it
shrinks. Thus protons newly built can be bound with nearby neutrons due
to this current ring possible to wrap them up together. Dr. Yoon
defines that this persistent current ring is the nuclear strong force.
newedana

  #233  
Old April 5th 06, 03:14 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

It appears people believes that average solar material is around
1.43g/cc, because this data is available in any science encyclopedia.
Don't believe this data. It is deduced from the postulation; stars were
built from cosmic gases such as hydrogen deuterium or helium, and
speculated that the solar material consists of hydrogen(74%),
helium(25%) and others(1%). In page 114-116 of Dr. Yoons physic text,
(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com) "National Science founded on A new
Atomic Model" he denies this hypothesis since it is against the
thermodynamic 3-th law, the natural law, and discusses for atoms in
high Temperature stars. He says the orbital electron in old atomic
model would be obviously unable to maintain their orbit or orbital
electron cloud around their nuclei in such a high temperature stars.
All of atomic orbital electrons would fly away from their nuclei, and
there cannot exist like atomic structures in the sun if we regard them
with the concept of old atomic structure. Dr Yoon's idea of hydrogen
atom is a neutron which carries a highly compressed orbital persistent
current ring near the proton to make it a solid hydrogen atom, since
neutron was built in the beginning of the universe, by putting inherent
energy in its structure, the atomic energy. He says when this neutron
builds all classis of element atoms in the sun the shrunk electron ring
attached to neutron expands and emits energy it absorbed. This is the
energy source of the sun and stars. Thus, there can clearly exist
atomic structure with orbital electron that builds a persistent current
ring, being attached very close to the atomic nuclei. If atomic orbital
electron is very close to its nucleus, star materials built with this
kind of atoms would have very high density, and would emit light with
shorter wavelengths. How scientific is his idea!
If average density of the sun is around 1.4g/cc, it is a little bit
heavier than water. Allegedly 99.99999999(15th 9)% of hydrogen atom is
vacant space. Water is the same in terms of involving such portion of
vacant space in its molecular structure. Nobody knows how are the state
of atomic structure in the sun. Physics today is totally ignorant for
density of materials, and for atomic volume, even for aggregating force
of metal atoms or molecules. Dr. Yoon explains for these questions.
newedana

  #234  
Old April 5th 06, 09:44 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
It appears people believes that average solar material is around
1.43g/cc, because this data is available in any science encyclopedia.
Don't believe this data. It is deduced from the postulation; stars were
built from cosmic gases such as hydrogen deuterium or helium, and
speculated that the solar material consists of hydrogen(74%),
helium(25%) and others(1%). In page 114-116 of Dr. Yoons physic text,
(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com) "National Science founded on A new
Atomic Model" he denies this hypothesis since it is against the
thermodynamic 3-th law, the natural law, and discusses for atoms in
high Temperature stars. He says the orbital electron in old atomic
model would be obviously unable to maintain their orbit or orbital
electron cloud around their nuclei in such a high temperature stars.
All of atomic orbital electrons would fly away from their nuclei,


Gee, has he ever heard of plasma?


and
there cannot exist like atomic structures in the sun if we regard them
with the concept of old atomic structure. Dr Yoon's idea of hydrogen
atom is a neutron which carries a highly compressed orbital persistent
current ring near the proton to make it a solid hydrogen atom,


And so he's still as stupid as a flatworm?

  #235  
Old April 6th 06, 06:48 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model


"Lloyd Parker" wrote in message
...
In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:

Gee, has he ever heard of plasma?

And so he's still as stupid as a flatworm?



And will remain so each month as he posts the same thing over and over
again.

Michael


  #236  
Old May 2nd 06, 04:23 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed a new generation of stars spawned by a super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy. This novel mode of star formation may solve several mysteries about these super-massive black holes that reside at centers of nearly all galaxies released on 5 Oct 2005.
According to a new result from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory,
released on November 2, 2005, "neutron star discovered where a black
hole was expected -- a very massive star collapsed to form a neutron
star and not a black hole as expected ."
This one of the greatest discoveries ever made in the history of human
science proves that existing astrophysical hypotheses explaining the
mechanism of forming stars and black holes from the cosmic gas clouds
such as giant piles of hydrogen, and subsequent migration theory of
stars, are out of real science. However, these Chandra’s astronomical
results were excellently predicted just 7 years before the revelation
of the news in Dr. Yoon’s New Physics
(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com), published in 1999 and then 2004 in
English version, titled ‘Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic
Model’. It is as follows
The diameter of a hydrogen atom is 10^-10 meters while its proton’s
10^-15 m, so their volume ratio is 1/10^15. It signifies in turn that
99.999999....(fifteen 9s) volume percent of a hydrogen atom is vacant
space. If this vacant space is completely squeezed out from its atomic
structure, the pure mass remained would have the utmost density of
7×10^7 metric tons/cc, since the density of liquid hydrogen is
0.071g/cc. This density may be equivalent to that of imaginary
substance of singularity.
Allegedly the repulsion between two electrons is 4.17×10^42 times as
great as that of gravitation acting between them when estimated from
Newton’s and Coulomb’s laws. This enormous ratio of these two
forces suggests explicitly that moving behavior of orbital electron is
entirely governed by its electromagnetic character, and negligibly
small is its mass effect. Nevertheless, present atomic model was built
based on this mass concept of orbital electron, moving at the speed of
light around its nucleus, obeying the rule of projectile mechanics.
Thus, believed is that the orbital electron of hydrogen atom builds a
kind of micro persistent current ring, as that flowing permanently
through a closed circuit of superconductor, since the atomic space is
an ideally perfect vacuum to be a room temperature superconductor for
moving electrons. Allegedly, the persistent current is possible to flow
through a superconductor of any complexly combined pathway system if it
builds a closed circuit. However, electron taken account as a mass
particle is unable to move permanently through such a pathway system.
The superconductor turns out to float upon an external magnet because
of the Missioner’s diamagnetic effect. Likewise, the orbital electron
building a micro persistent current ring does not fall into its nucleus
but floats around the nucleus due to its nuclear magnetism. That is why
orbital electron never merges to its nucleus, and can perform orbital
motion permanently at near the speed of light around its nucleus
without any energy supply.
This micro orbital persistent current ring is built from Michael
Faraday's electric force fluxes emanated from atomic orbital electron,
which have a strong shrinking elasticity, unlike electric field lines
defined in present atomic physics. If orbital electron moves at such a
high seed of light, these electric force fluxes cannot keep their
stationary radial symmetric orientation. They have to be lagged
completely behind the moving electron to arrange in parallel to connect
by their heads to tails bending spirally, and building closed circuits
upon which self-induced magnetic force fluxes bind them tightly from
outside in perpendicular planes. It is due to a time delay between
moving speed of electron and its electric force fluxes. The evidence is
that electromagnetic wave phases are built from these time-delayed
electromagnetic force fluxes emanated from oscillating electrons in
their emitter.
The electron building a persistent current ring is impossible to behave
as a mass particle, but acts as an electron ring emitting only an
intensive magnetism that changes alternately its polarity depending on
its revolving direction. It has no electric interaction between
neighboring other electron rings, due to its electric force fluxes
wound spirally and connect to its nucleus. That is why hydrogen atom is
electrically perfect neutral and extremely resilient against external
stress like a steel ball.
Neutron is nothing else than a hydrogen atom from which this vacant
space is completely excluded, a proton carrying an electron at the
nearest distance. However, present atomic physics does not view it as
that way, since a positive proton binding a negative electron at such a
close distance means a mass chaos. So, an unnatural view for the
neutron was established. It says a dead particle exhausted to emit its
potential energy.
In the beginning of universe, it is certain neutron was built from
hydrogen atom by squeezing out the vacant space in its structure,
putting in it a cosmic huge energy. It is nothing else than the
essentiality of atomic energy deposited in the nuclear persistent
current of neutron. The evidence is that it emits energy it absorbed in
reverse when the persistent current ring expands to build a hydrogen
atom. It is called β-decay of neutron. Other evidence is that
tritinium ^3H1 converts into ^3He2 by the same β-decay, discharging an
electron carrying a huge energy, one of two neutrons in its nucleus
being converted into a proton and an electron. The β-ray electrons
discharged from atomic nuclei of radioactive elements carry out an
enormous kinetic energy, possible to drive them to have near the speed
of light. Wolfgang Pauli postulated in 1930 that this weird energy was
corpuscular electron-neutrino with zero mass, in order to justify the
energy conservation rule for the energy of β-ray electrons with
particle physics.
The micro orbital persistent current ring connected to the nucleus
through electromagnetic force fluxes, performs a torsional harmonic
oscillation, by centering its diametric axis, a precession-motion of
current electron for its nucleus, as it absorbs or emits
electromagnetic energies. Thus, gross energy of current electron is
built with its orbiting energy to keep atomic structure and the energy
of precession-motion, extractable as electromagnetic radiations.
When a given energy capacity of orbital current ring is saturated by
taking up external energy, it shrinks its radius stepwise, and
approaches the nucleus limitlessly, so it has an opposite energy order
to that of existing atomic model. Thus, energy emission occurs when it
expands its radius, as though spiral spring releases energy as it
unwinds. Based on this energy order it is possible to build an equation
by due process possible to estimate all classis of electromagnetic
waves of whatever the wavelengths. The equation has a following form,
Δν = νo [ 1/r^2 – 1/(r + n)^2 ] (1)
Where, νo : Rydberg frequency, r = 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1/2 1/3,
1/4…..1/∞ : radial parameter of electron ring, n = 1, 2, 3, 4,
…….. ∞: parameter of frequency overtone performed by electron
ring.
Fixing the parameter r=1 and then changing sequentially the parameter,
n=1, 2, 3, .…∞ in Eq.(1), it gives the hydrogen spectrum of Lyman
series, including its series limit. Increasing and fixing parameter r =
2 and then changing the parameter with the same way as n = 1, 2,
3,..….∞, Its Balmer series is given, and so on.
Shrinking its radius inversely, it is also possible to emit all kinds
of lights with shorter wavelengths, such as hard ultra violet rays,
X-rays and gamma rays. For instance, when
r=1/2~1/4, it emits lights with wavelengths between 227.8~56.9 Ã…, hard
Uv ray wavelength, if r = 1/34 ~1/60, X-ray wavelengths of 0.788~0.253
Å, if r = 1/430 it emits γ-rays with wavelengths of around 0.00492
Ã…. It signifies in turn that electron ring attached to neutron is
possible to emit γ-rays with wavelength of around 0.005Å. However, it
looks if parameter r is under units, frequency overtone hardly occurs.
Since neutron is electrically neutral, it is possible to join in
nuclear system. Persistent current ring carried by neutron has no
electric character, but produces magnetic force, so neutron is
electrically neutral and has an unusual magnetic moment.
Nuclear electron ring attached to a neutron has an ultra high tenacity
possible to wrap up a number of protons that repulse each other in the
nuclear system, since it has folded thickness of integer multiples as
it shrinks to be a nuclear electron ring. It is due to constant high
speed of orbital electron.
Thus, wrapping a proton with a nuclear electron ring gives a neutron,
wrapping two protons constructs a deuteron, and wrapping three protons
makes a 3^He2 nucleus. In helium nucleus, the nuclear persistent
current rings of two deuterons turn out to build a magnetically unified
nuclear persistent current ring with two electrons, which is possible
to bind 4 protons to build two neutrons and two protons. It suggests in
turn that neutron and proton are possible to commute each other with
enormous frequencies. This force of binding a number of protons against
their charge reulsion is nothing else than the nuclear strong force. If
this persistent current ring associated in radioactive atomic nuclei
being destructed, the liberated electron carry out its revolving
kinetic energy as they come out from the atomic nuclei, accompanying
the emission of gamma rays. This is the source of weird kinetic energy
of β-ray electrons.
The neutron that stores atomic energy in its structure rules out not
only all the phenomenal order of physicochemical world in the nature
but also the grand cosmic order of generating elements and new stars.
If there was so-called the big bang explosion at the beginning of this
universe, the giant mass conglomerate of pre-explosion was built surely
from this neutron, because it is electrically neutral and has an
unusually great magnetic momentum, possible to pile up to make such a
giant mass conglomerate,
This giant neutron conglomerate ultimately had to explode if the energy
produced by β-decay of neutron was accumulated gradually within it due
to formation of atomic nuclei, the insertion of vacant space in it.
This might be the so-called big bang explosion. Among numerous
fragments of exploded neutron blocks, huge sized ones turn out to build
all the galactic universes respectively as they fly away in radial
symmetric directions with fast speeds (expansion of universe). Smaller
fragments build strayed small stars, or numerous meteorites, and the
finest one converts into cosmic gases such as hydrogen, deuterium and
helium.
Since inside of the giant neutron mass should have certainly a
supercritical energy environment of ultra high temperature and
pressure, there must occur a variety of nuclear reaction, such as the
reaction between a proton produced by β-decay and a nearby neutron to
build a deuteron, connecting them by the nuclear strong force.
Deuterons thus made are also possible to bind themselves to form a
helium nucleus with their unified persistent current ring by their
magnetic force fluxes, emitting huge atomic energy, as mentioned above.
Thus, the deuteron turns out to be a fundamental building block of all
the 92 kinds of natural element atoms including their isotopes found on
the earth. Note that any kind of atomic nuclei contains approximately
the same number of neutron and proton, except hydrogen atom.
Since the energy stored in the neutron structure in the beginning of
the universe is the essential atomic energy, as mentioned above the
hydrogen atom distributed in the cosmic space is not a fuel of nuclear
fusion of stars but is a mere ash exhausted to emit its atomic energy.
Thus we can reasonably understand the energy source of the sun and
other stars. It is the energy deposited in neutrons ( solid hydrogen)
which turn out to emit in the process of forming element atoms, the
energy of expanding atomic or nuclear persistent current rings.
However, people presently believe that it is the fusion energy of
hydrogen as Hans Bethe predicted in his 1938 paper. It appears that he
didn't care how this lightest gas distributed in the cosmic space can
be continuously fed into the core phase of the sun or stars where
nuclear fusion takes place, overcoming its penetrating problem through
the highly dense celestial material, e.g., the solar material with
density of 100g/cm^3in the core phase. However, this density is also a
hypothetical figure, since atomic physics today is totally ignorant for
this density problem of materials in orbital electron level. So, nobody
knows yet how can uranium atom have smaller atomic volume 12.5 than
that of hydrogen atom 14.1, despite that it has greatly larger number
of electron sells than hydrogen atom.
The fragmented neutron blocks from the explosion turn out to inflate
their volume as they insert vacant space in their structure, in the
process of forming atomic nuclei there, releasing atomic energy. Thus
there occurs naturally a phase separation inside them: core phases with
higher density while shell phases with lesser density.
Generation of a new star is possible from the shell phases stripped and
spun off from the core phases, since the fragmented neutron blocks with
the ultra high temperature and pressure must rotate at a fast speed
because of the big bang explosion. The star-making process repeats in
countless times and build galactic universe carrying hundreds and
billions of family stars.
The core phase of giant neutron block at the center of a galactic
universe subsequently plays a role of gravity center for its all family
stars because it has the ultra high density of around 7×10^13
metric-tons/cc, approximately 7×10^11 times as large as that of solar
materials in the core phase. So, a neutron star even with the same size
as the sun must have super-gravitation, possible to pull about 350
billions of stars with the same density as that of the sun. Instead of
black holes, such neutron stars may reside at the center of each
galactic universe, in which the formation of atomic nuclei and
generation of star is still active, emitting across most of
electromagnetic spectrum including the big blast of gamma rays, and all
kinds of mass particles as the solar wind.
The star already spun-off is also possible to produce new stars of
second generation, the planets, and these planets can also spin off new
stars of third generation and their satellites with the same mechanism
of forming new stars. The sun is the first generation star, the earth
and other 8 planets the second generations, and the moon and other 130
satellites the third generations.
This is the mechanism of forming all the stars in a fragmented neutron
mass block. One evidence supporting this story is that hundreds and
billions of stars are densely created and distributed within the
limited regions of each galactic universe, and orbiting all together
with the same direction around the center of galactic universe,
carrying their own family stars, and no stars are being made lonely
between inter galactic spaces.
Other evidence is that the primary, secondary and tertiary orbital
motions of stars in our solar system are performed on the same orbital
plane with the same orbiting direction. This orbiting plane and
direction must be the original spinning plane and direction of the
fragmented main neutron mass conglomerate.
Regarding the core density 100 g/cc of the solar material, a remarkable
amount of neutron may be still retained in the sun, where the formation
of element nuclei of heavier atoms is active
The earth might still have some amounts of such neutron mass decaying
very slowly to give out moderate heat from its core phase to sustain
global temperature being invariant for billions of years, adequate for
survival of all living things. However random occurrence of radical
nuclear reactions would bring about the seismic and volcanogenic
activities, due to volume expansion of core phase of the earth, due to
formation of atomic nuclei. Thus the volcano explosion appears to play
a role of safety valve to prevent an ultimately disastrous explosion to
exterminate whole the living things on the earth because of the
accumulation of this nuclear energy inside the earth.
The evolution of the universe proceeds along unilateral direction, the
direction of flowing atomic energy deposited in neutron that disperses
to attain equilibrium. It never builds a closed cycle as believed
today, because once dispersed energy never restores automatically its
initial density. This is the second law of thermodynamics, the law of
the great nature. Final post of newedana

  #237  
Old May 2nd 06, 09:25 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed a new generation of stars spawned by a

super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy. This novel
mode of star formation may solve several mysteries about these super-massive
black holes that reside at centers of nearly all galaxies released on 5 Oct
2005.
According to a new result from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory,
released on November 2, 2005, "neutron star discovered where a black
hole was expected -- a very massive star collapsed to form a neutron
star and not a black hole as expected ."


So the upper limit for a neutron star was off, or maybe it takes time.

This one of the greatest discoveries ever made in the history of human
science


Oh total BS. Like all your posts.

proves that existing astrophysical hypotheses explaining the
mechanism of forming stars and black holes from the cosmic gas clouds
such as giant piles of hydrogen, and subsequent migration theory of
stars, are out of real science. However, these Chandra’s astronomical
results were excellently predicted just 7 years before the revelation
of the news in Dr. Yoon’s New Physics
(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com), published in 1999 and then 2004 in
English version, titled ‘Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic
Model’. It is as follows


More BS. Don't you ever get tired playing the fool?

The diameter of a hydrogen atom is 10^-10 meters while its proton’s
10^-15 m, so their volume ratio is 1/10^15. It signifies in turn that
99.999999....(fifteen 9s) volume percent of a hydrogen atom is vacant
space. If this vacant space is completely squeezed out from its atomic
structure, the pure mass remained would have the utmost density of
7×10^7 metric tons/cc, since the density of liquid hydrogen is
0.071g/cc. This density may be equivalent to that of imaginary
substance of singularity.
Allegedly the repulsion between two electrons is 4.17×10^42 times as
great as that of gravitation acting between them when estimated from
Newton’s and Coulomb’s laws. This enormous ratio of these two
forces suggests explicitly that moving behavior of orbital electron is
entirely governed by its electromagnetic character, and negligibly
small is its mass effect. Nevertheless, present atomic model was built
based on this mass concept of orbital electron, moving at the speed of
light around its nucleus, obeying the rule of projectile mechanics.
Thus, believed is that the orbital electron of hydrogen atom builds a
kind of micro persistent current ring, as that flowing permanently
through a closed circuit of superconductor, since the atomic space is
an ideally perfect vacuum to be a room temperature superconductor for
moving electrons. Allegedly, the persistent current is possible to flow
through a superconductor of any complexly combined pathway system if it
builds a closed circuit. However, electron taken account as a mass
particle is unable to move permanently through such a pathway system.
The superconductor turns out to float upon an external magnet because
of the Missioner’s diamagnetic effect. Likewise, the orbital electron
building a micro persistent current ring does not fall into its nucleus
but floats around the nucleus due to its nuclear magnetism. That is why
orbital electron never merges to its nucleus, and can perform orbital
motion permanently at near the speed of light around its nucleus
without any energy supply.


Two words -- quantum mechanics.

Total crap.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Amateur Astronomy 6 June 21st 04 06:26 AM
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Astronomy Misc 0 June 20th 04 06:47 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney Amateur Astronomy 2 May 31st 04 04:30 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney SETI 0 May 30th 04 08:53 PM
when will our planet stop rotating? meat n potatoes Amateur Astronomy 61 March 27th 04 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.