|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
fourth "live post" from the Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics
The concluding talk on open problems in cosmology was given by Joe Silk.
I'll mention below a few things I found particularly interesting. Although the standard cosmological model essentially fits all the data, nevertheless people have looked for departures, in particular a non-constant cosmological "constant", usually parameterized as a change of equation of state with time. Observations are closing in on the regular cosmological constant, so it will probably be difficult to justify projects to narrow this down even more, in contrast, say, to gravitational-wave science, where it is clear that interesting stuff will be found. For the first time, some of the enthusiasm about gravitational waves reached me as well. Also, there is no compelling theoretical reason to expect some sort of "dark energy" other than the cosmological constant. No dark matter has been detected. Experiments for direct detection or production in colliders have turned up nothing. Possibly self-annihilation is seen in gamma rays at the centre of the Milky Way, but this is far from clear. There is still a window for WIMPs as dark matter, probably very low mass (de Broglie wavelengths measured in kiloparsecs) or high mass (TeV). Joe also thinks, though, that primordial black holes might be the best bet. The tension in the Hubble constant is real, but no-one knows what it means. If a banal explanation isn't forthcoming, perhaps new physics is around the corner. Joe also favours the low value, in part because it allows for a slightly older universe, old enough to accommodate the oldest objects. It is unclear what will resolve the inconsistencies between numerical simulations of galaxy formation and observations. While the former continue to improve to match the latter, what would be interesting are actual predictions from the former, later confirmed (or ruled out) by the latter. One of the basic questions of cosmology is still unanswered: is the universe finite or infinite? The official announcement was made for the next Texas Symposium, to be held in Prague. Some already knew, and a website (where one can register) has been up for a while. For a while, the symposia alternated betwen North America and the rest of the world. The last regular one in North America was in Vancouver in 2008, and since the 50th-anniversary symposium in Dallas in 2013, two have been in Europe and one in Africa. Maybe 2023 or 2025 will see it move back to North America. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
fourth "live post" from the Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics
In article , Jos
Bergervoet writes: On 19/12/21 2:53 AM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote: ... No dark matter has been detected. [apart from its gravitational influence] ... Experiments for direct detection or production in colliders have turned up nothing. Possibly self-annihilation is seen in gamma rays at the centre of the Milky Way, but this is far from clear. There is still a window for WIMPs as dark matter, probably very low mass (de Broglie wavelengths measured in kiloparsecs) or high mass (TeV). Joe also thinks, though, that primordial black holes might be the best bet. As a theoretical physicist, I actually hope that primordial black holes do exist, but do not give the answer! (To the missing dark matter I mean, the universe and the rest put aside for a moment..) Because the standard model of particle physics would be much more convincing if the axion were found to exist. Any axion discussions on the symposium? https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-dark-matter-might-be-axions-20191127/ The axion was mentioned. Someone even showed a picture of Axion detergent, apparently the source of the name (as it would wash away the strong CP problem). However, since there has been nothing new regarding axions (other than more non-detections), there was no detailed discussion of it. I agree that it is one of the better motivated WIMPs. Primordial black holes have become more popular for two reasons. First, an article about three years ago by Carr, K=FChnel, and Sandsted showed that they are still allowed. Traditionally they had been thought to be ruled out, but asteroid-mass and several-hundred-solar-mass black holes are allowed, at least if there is a relatively broad distribution in masses (which is what one would expect anyway), perhaps even solar-mass black holes (but not Jupiter-mass). Mike Hawkins, who was also there, had been strongly advocating Jupiter-mass black holes, saying that they cause most long-term variability in quasars, but his arguments have been shown to be wrong. Some people misinterpreted this to mean that all primordial black holes as the main component of dark matter had been ruled out. To be fair, Mike has mellowed a bit, and now says that he got the mass wrong. Mike gave a talk where he looked at variability in multiply imaged quasars where at least one image is far from the galaxy. Because they are multiply imaged, one can use the time delay to get rid of the intrinsic variability, so what is left is probably microlensing, but at a place where the density of the galactic halo in stars is way too low. Another reason is LIGO. The black holes which have been detected so far are not exactly what one would expect if they were all descended from massive stars. If LIGO (which is now up to a detection a week) detects black holes of below a solar mass or so, this will be a strong indication that they are primordial. The primordial-black-hole scenario makes some definite LIGO predictions, so that has revived interest in it. The main thing is that LIGO can rule it out, and since LIGO is detecting stuff, this is, at the moment, more interesting than WIMP detectors. Primordial black holes as dark matter would not require any new physics. (In fact, it might require new physics to avoid them.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
third "livepost" from the Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics | Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)[_2_] | Research | 0 | December 20th 19 06:46 AM |
second "livepost" from the Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics | Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)[_2_] | Research | 0 | December 18th 19 09:54 AM |
"live post" from the Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics | Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)[_2_] | Research | 0 | December 17th 19 05:47 AM |
Live Nude Astronomy - Gone "Postal"? Gone "Ballistic"? How About Going "Supernova"?! | Paine | Misc | 7 | April 6th 08 08:38 AM |
"Kali" Apology VVFWS NOMINATION: Guilty: Anyone Who Is Deliberately Supporting George Bush George Bush: World's #1 Mass Murderer "Kali" and the Torture Camps: The Abu Ghraib files Live From Fascist America | Double-A | Misc | 1 | March 26th 06 10:22 PM |