|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 2/2/13 7:37 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
Your expertise of BHs is roughly worth squat Maybe so, but it's a dern sight better than yourn, Brad. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 6, 9:39*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/6/13 5:20 PM, Brad Guth wrote: If your small coffee were all neutrons, it would probably stay hot for trillions upon trillions of years, not to mention its mass sinking it to the very core of Earth. * *If something is going to be essentially all neutrons, its mass must be * * * * 1.44 Mass 2.9 solar masses I never said any such thing. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 6, 9:46*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/2/13 7:37 PM, Brad Guth wrote: Your expertise of BHs is roughly worth squat * *Maybe so, but it's a dern sight better than yourn, Brad. A zero gravity interior of an EH is 100% physics-101. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 3/6/13 11:52 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 6, 9:46 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/2/13 7:37 PM, Brad Guth wrote: Your expertise of BHs is roughly worth squat Maybe so, but it's a dern sight better than yourn, Brad. A zero gravity interior of an EH is 100% physics-101. No Brad--BHs are not shells. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 3/6/13 11:49 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 6, 9:39 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/6/13 5:20 PM, Brad Guth wrote: If your small coffee were all neutrons, it would probably stay hot for trillions upon trillions of years, not to mention its mass sinking it to the very core of Earth. If something is going to be essentially all neutrons, its mass must be 1.44 Mass 2.9 solar masses I never said any such thing. Good! |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 6, 9:56*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/6/13 11:52 PM, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 6, 9:46 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/2/13 7:37 PM, Brad Guth wrote: Your expertise of BHs is roughly worth squat * * Maybe so, but it's a dern sight better than yourn, Brad. A zero gravity interior of an EH is 100% physics-101. * *No Brad--BHs are not shells. Got any subjective evidence in support of such a theory? |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 3/6/13 11:59 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 6, 9:56 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/6/13 11:52 PM, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 6, 9:46 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/2/13 7:37 PM, Brad Guth wrote: Your expertise of BHs is roughly worth squat Maybe so, but it's a dern sight better than yourn, Brad. A zero gravity interior of an EH is 100% physics-101. No Brad--BHs are not shells. Got any subjective evidence in support of such a theory? I was going to ask you, as you were the one making the claim, Brad. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 6, 10:01*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/6/13 11:59 PM, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 6, 9:56 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/6/13 11:52 PM, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 6, 9:46 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/2/13 7:37 PM, Brad Guth wrote: Your expertise of BHs is roughly worth squat * * *Maybe so, but it's a dern sight better than yourn, Brad. A zero gravity interior of an EH is 100% physics-101. * * No Brad--BHs are not shells. Got any subjective evidence in support of such a theory? * *I was going to ask you, as you were the one making the claim, Brad.. My theory is founded in physics-101. Are you suggesting the core singularity as having a surface gravity of c+ within a BH/EH has volume? |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 3/7/13 12:05 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
My theory is founded in physics-101. Are you suggesting the core singularity as having a surface gravity of c+ within a BH/EH has volume? Brad, you have a track record (your posting record) of making unsubstantiated claim about the moon, Venus, Sirius and a whole host of other thinks that certainly are not physics. Surface gravity of a BH is mathematically defined, Brad. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 6, 10:08*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/7/13 12:05 AM, Brad Guth wrote: My theory is founded in physics-101. Are you suggesting the core singularity as having a surface gravity of c+ within a BH/EH has volume? * *Brad, you have a track record (your posting record) of making * *unsubstantiated claim about the moon, Venus, Sirius and a whole * *host of other thinks that certainly are not physics. * *Surface gravity of a BH is mathematically defined, Brad. Good for math that can't seem to prove how we walked on the moon, or why Venus could not be photographed from the moon, and a host of other silly matters that you brown-nosed parrots are always so proud of. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Westchester, NY, Weather today, reports Twittering Fl Today | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | April 21st 07 02:23 AM |
Westchester, NY, Weather today, reports Twittering Fl Today | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | April 10th 07 10:04 PM |
Today | Christopher | Space Station | 0 | January 1st 05 12:51 PM |