|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BBC terminology boob?
People
In discussing the great 28" refractor the expert Greg repeatedly mentions *sleeks* as one of the limiting factors of optical glass production in the past. What he really means, of course, are *striae*. Areas within the body of the glass which have a slight difference in refractive index to the majority of the glass. These are usually caused by stresses induced in the glass as it cools. Optical glass annealing in the late 1800s was not the fine art it is today and such large blanks as the 28" were incredibly difficult to produce with perfect homogeneity. *Sleeks* are an (almost) insignificant cosmetic surface defect as a result of imperfect optical polishing. Though obviously undesirable they would be invisible in the image of almost any astronomical instrument except (perhaps) for a coronagraph. If one is trying to educate the 'unwashed' then I do think the correct terminology should be used. Otherwise the authority of the so-called "expert" is undermined and nothing further he says can be taken at face value without checking. I know I'm a complete pedant but somebody has to make a stand! :-) http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today...00/7972981.stm All together now, children. Repeat after me! Striae *not* sleeks! ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Robin Hood-Astronomical Continuity Boob | Mike Dworetsky | UK Astronomy | 4 | April 6th 09 08:23 AM |
A few questions about terminology... | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 13 | November 13th 07 06:45 PM |
Terminology | Whippy | UK Astronomy | 3 | June 18th 04 01:58 PM |
terminology question | david | UK Astronomy | 6 | April 12th 04 08:22 PM |
Refractor Terminology.... | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 12th 03 07:39 PM |