#131
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Laws
On Oct 25, 10:42 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 25, 1:53 wrote: On Oct 19, 10:42 am, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 18, 3:59 wrote: On Oct 14, 9:23 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 14, 4:28 wrote: On Oct 14, 5:16 pm, Jim Davis wrote: William Mook wrote: I suppose when the voice of reason can't prove me wrong, they call out the voice of unreason. William, would you care to identify by whom you mean by "they"? Surely you don't think there's a mysterious "they" out there trying to make life difficult for you, do you? I mean, that's always been *Brad's* complaint. :-) Well, if this line of reasoning causes Brad to temper his responses does it matter? Now that's a weird contribution, Rabbi Mook. What part of MI5/NSA did you say you worked for? - Brad Guth - Is it just me being Californicated watching all the specialty license plates in Malibu, but does MI5/NSA when you squint at it look like MENSA? Is Brad trying to tell us something? Is he sending a coded message? Discuss among yourselves. Cause we're not going to get much done talking about moon laws.. haha.. Of whomever has the biggest and best battery of SBLs (aka laser cannons) is clearly in charge of whatever "moon laws" they'd care to impose. The best location and energy resource for accommodating those SBLs is directly related to my LSE-CM/ISS. Terribly sorry about all that. What do exactly you have against an efficient and safe Lunar Space Elevator? BTW, is there anyone else in this anti-think-tank of usenet naysayland that likes 75+% of your research and ideas, besides myself? Just wondering, can you list those of usenet as being constructively in support of anythingWillie.Moo/(William Mook)? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brad, Please understand, and I say this with the greatest respect and care I can muster, you are quite mad. Literally out of your mind. The moment that dawns on you without remorse, without self revulsion, without attacking yourself, without guilt, you can begin to heal. Now, having said that, please understand I have nothing against your schemes they are merely wrong. I have nothing against your beliefs. They are merely wrong. Its just that simple. If you would adjust your thinking so that you could see that you are foregoing a lot of happiness in your life because first and foremost you want to be right. And if you cannot be right, then its war! haha.. Let me put it this way. Let's say there was a President who told the American people that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when there wasn't. And lets say there was a President who told the American people that Al Queda operated out of Iraq when it iddn't. And lets say that there was an American President who told the American people that our troops would be greeted as liberators when they wouldn't. And lets say that there was an American President who said that the Iraqi oil would pay for the war, which it couldn't. Now lets say the American President really and truly believed these things when he said them. Would he be right in asking someone who questioned the validity of those beliefs, why he hated America? What he had against America? Same thing with you Brad. Such a President may be ill-informed, may be a tool of larger powers, may be crazy, may even be a liar. But one thing that President couldn't logically and rationally ask anyone who called him on his judgments, is what did you have against America? That's just madness and points directly at madness. Same thing with you Brad. WHat do I have against your lunar space station elevator idea? Well, I have nothing against it,except it won't work as you advertise and its a waste of time energy and resources to even think about. But you wrongly and madly jump from that benign statement about reality to what do I have against you? I have nothing at all against you Brad except you waste an inordinate amount of time on unworkable insane bull****, and no matter how clearly and plainly someone points out the error of your ways, you absolutely refuse to acknowledge the madness and ask what people have against you. haha.. To which we conclude, you are either ill-informed, or a tool of larger powers, or crazy, or lying through your teeth. And these are not mutually exclusive. I saw a picture in the New York Times the other day of the Dali Llama and President Bush in the Capitol Rotunda. Bush was running his mouth pointing at some detail of the artwork in the Rotunda. That'd be like him, having audience with one of the most enlightened humans on the planet and not taking the time to listen what he might have to say, and wasting his time with pointless minutiae. haha.. You just gotta laugh. The way the Dali Llama was laughing while Bush was running his mouth. And that's the way I laugh at you and your insane questions. While I try once again to set you on the road to sanity. good luck dude. ??? "To which we conclude" ??? (there's that pesky "we" again) Does that mean that your MI5/DHS/NSA/CIA infowar resources are running a bit thin? BTW, when am I getting that ride onboard your N367G? (I'd like nothing better than taking a spendy crap at 40,000' while onboard your private 737-75). If I got better and stayed really nice (even to those nasty Zion Yids), could I have one of my own? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oops! looks as though I've just killed off our resident MI5/NSA/CIA spook William Mook. Sorry about that. Perhaps Raytheon and General Electric can find it within their offshore corporate hearts to forgive and forget, just like they forgave and forgotten about most of everything else that got us into this perpetrated cloak and dagger bloody and spendy 9/11 fiasco. - Brad Guth - |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Laws
On Oct 25, 3:41 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 20, 5:28 am, wrote: On Oct 19, 10:47 wrote: On Oct 10, 4:21 am, wrote: A $40 billion satellite networkthat provided 50 billion broadband wireless channels to existing wireless hardware and has a $100 million recurring cost, would provide basic services to existing providers at such a cost that they would jump onto the systemd so fast. And you could also steal some customers from those providers with slight reduction in costs and improvements in service. And you could bring more customers into service at today's prices or slightly below todays prices. All this would gen up $35 billion a year and consume something like 2 billion of your channels. Now, you're in a position to win a price war and expand your income to about $120 billion per year - and increase participation in the market to about twice as many subscribers as you had in the market before the system was created. I agree, so when is William Mook, Warren Buffett and myself going to accomplish this worthy task that's worth "$120 billion per year"? - Brad Guth - Well I'm working on some synfuel plants right now. Once that is underway I will do some acquisitions in the US. I am not seeking outside investors or participation. Willie.Moo, I must say that Raytheon and General Electric N367G corporate 737-75(BBJ) jet is impressive. Is any part of it your's? I'm certain that Raytheon and General Electric have each taken advantage of every possible tax credit under the sun (and then some), in so much that basically that spendy aircraft has became owned by the public that had to pay extra tax so that those corporate folks didn't have to spend an actual red cent out of their deep pockets. Are you trying to suggest that you're well connected? When do I get a ride in that nifty N367G? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I was shown the jet at the 2006 NBAA annual meeting October '06 down in Florida by AVPRO. Since 1999 737 airframes go for $12 million and there were a lot of surplus, and since GE had fully depreciated this jet (it belonged to Jack Welch) I offered $16 million for it. AVPRO sales person laughed. They'd need at least $35 million. I pointed out that at $1900 per flight hour at $16 million they'd have zero dollars in the jet after depreciation allowances. After some negotiations I thought we agreed on $32. That after Delta Air Elite, whom I arranged to operate the jet for my Swiss Trust, said they could make $500,000 profit per week shuttling teams and VIPs to China in it during the 2008 Olympics. But before I could close on that, GE then fired AVPRO and hired a Florida biz jet reseller who told them they could get $65.5 million out of the 8 year old jet. New BBJs cost $64 million so I think this madness. The jet is still for sale. Boeing is selling their 2002 BBJ, and a BBJ slated for delivery in 2008 is being offered for sale. Rising oil prices and a general slow down in the US economy bode ill for the sale of these jets. I've gone back to my $16 million offer - which I think fair. Once I acquire a BBJ, you can certainly charter time on board for $11,000 an hour, 2 hour minimum. With a capacity of 14 that's less than $1,000 per hour per person. So, for a 2 hour flight you could take a team of 14 people 1,000 miles in a short period of time and get some business done en-route. Of course if you're talking about flying from LA to Sydney, or LA to Jakarta, with 14 people flying business class - you have 20 hours in flight each way which is non productive. And you're paying $20,000 per person - in business class. And you're paying $600 per hour for the folks you're flying around. So, that's 40 hours times $600 - which is another $24,000 - a total of $44,000 per person. Do this twice per month, and you're talking $88,000 per person, and 14 people $1.23 million per month on air travel of critical people. At $32 million acquisition cost - that's $640,000 per month plus 80 flight hours per month - at $2,000 per hour - another $160,000 - a total of $800,000 - a savings of $430,000 per month from the business class flights for 14 people. With an 8 year depreciation schedule that's another $333,000 off per month - and interest payment deductions and so forth - you can see having a jet to keep your teams on task - and productive in transit which is invaluable. Add to this two flights per month, another 60 rentable hours at $11,000 per hour - for the Chinese olympics - and that's another $660,000 of income - which reduces costs dramatically. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Laws
On Oct 29, 4:08 pm, wrote:
On Oct 25, 3:41 am, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 20, 5:28 am, wrote: On Oct 19, 10:47 wrote: On Oct 10, 4:21 am, wrote: A $40 billion satellite networkthat provided 50 billion broadband wireless channels to existing wireless hardware and has a $100 million recurring cost, would provide basic services to existing providers at such a cost that they would jump onto the systemd so fast. And you could also steal some customers from those providers with slight reduction in costs and improvements in service. And you could bring more customers into service at today's prices or slightly below todays prices. All this would gen up $35 billion a year and consume something like 2 billion of your channels. Now, you're in a position to win a price war and expand your income to about $120 billion per year - and increase participation in the market to about twice as many subscribers as you had in the market before the system was created. I agree, so when is William Mook, Warren Buffett and myself going to accomplish this worthy task that's worth "$120 billion per year"? - Brad Guth - Well I'm working on some synfuel plants right now. Once that is underway I will do some acquisitions in the US. I am not seeking outside investors or participation. Willie.Moo, I must say that Raytheon and General Electric N367G corporate 737-75(BBJ) jet is impressive. Is any part of it your's? I'm certain that Raytheon and General Electric have each taken advantage of every possible tax credit under the sun (and then some), in so much that basically that spendy aircraft has became owned by the public that had to pay extra tax so that those corporate folks didn't have to spend an actual red cent out of their deep pockets. Are you trying to suggest that you're well connected? When do I get a ride in that nifty N367G? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I was shown the jet at the 2006 NBAA annual meeting October '06 down in Florida by AVPRO. Since 1999 737 airframes go for $12 million and there were a lot of surplus, and since GE had fully depreciated this jet (it belonged to Jack Welch) I offered $16 million for it. AVPRO sales person laughed. They'd need at least $35 million. I pointed out that at $1900 per flight hour at $16 million they'd have zero dollars in the jet after depreciation allowances. After some negotiations I thought we agreed on $32. That after Delta Air Elite, whom I arranged to operate the jet for my Swiss Trust, said they could make $500,000 profit per week shuttling teams and VIPs to China in it during the 2008 Olympics. But before I could close on that, GE then fired AVPRO and hired a Florida biz jet reseller who told them they could get $65.5 million out of the 8 year old jet. New BBJs cost $64 million so I think this madness. The jet is still for sale. Boeing is selling their 2002 BBJ, and a BBJ slated for delivery in 2008 is being offered for sale. Rising oil prices and a general slow down in the US economy bode ill for the sale of these jets. I've gone back to my $16 million offer - which I think fair. Once I acquire a BBJ, you can certainly charter time on board for $11,000 an hour, 2 hour minimum. With a capacity of 14 that's less than $1,000 per hour per person. So, for a 2 hour flight you could take a team of 14 people 1,000 miles in a short period of time and get some business done en-route. Of course if you're talking about flying from LA to Sydney, or LA to Jakarta, with 14 people flying business class - you have 20 hours in flight each way which is non productive. And you're paying $20,000 per person - in business class. And you're paying $600 per hour for the folks you're flying around. So, that's 40 hours times $600 - which is another $24,000 - a total of $44,000 per person. Do this twice per month, and you're talking $88,000 per person, and 14 people $1.23 million per month on air travel of critical people. At $32 million acquisition cost - that's $640,000 per month plus 80 flight hours per month - at $2,000 per hour - another $160,000 - a total of $800,000 - a savings of $430,000 per month from the business class flights for 14 people. With an 8 year depreciation schedule that's another $333,000 off per month - and interest payment deductions and so forth - you can see having a jet to keep your teams on task - and productive in transit which is invaluable. Add to this two flights per month, another 60 rentable hours at $11,000 per hour - for the Chinese olympics - and that's another $660,000 of income - which reduces costs dramatically.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You'd best acquire that BBJ as being from a certain offshore phosphate/ guano island nation of Nauru (aka NASA/Apollo moon landing site), perhaps regestered as part owned by Dick Cheney or Henry Kissinger, so that there'll never be any of those pesky future questions to avoid. The cost of jet fuel at perhaps $5.50 or even $7.00 per gallon (including all local and federal tax) is not a problem if you are rich and powerful, as you simply adjust your cost of living by putting your hands more frequently into that offshore cookie jar, which of course always has to include enough cookies for the ownership and operations of that BBJ as one of those essential perks of your business, even though your business doesn't actually require any such BBJ. - Brad Guth - |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Laws
On Oct 30, 3:29 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 29, 4:08 pm, wrote: On Oct 25, 3:41 am, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 20, 5:28 am, wrote: On Oct 19, 10:47 wrote: On Oct 10, 4:21 am, wrote: A $40 billion satellite networkthat provided 50 billion broadband wireless channels to existing wireless hardware and has a $100 million recurring cost, would provide basic services to existing providers at such a cost that they would jump onto the systemd so fast. And you could also steal some customers from those providers with slight reduction in costs and improvements in service. And you could bring more customers into service at today's prices or slightly below todays prices. All this would gen up $35 billion a year and consume something like 2 billion of your channels. Now, you're in a position to win a price war and expand your income to about $120 billion per year - and increase participation in the market to about twice as many subscribers as you had in the market before the system was created. I agree, so when is William Mook, Warren Buffett and myself going to accomplish this worthy task that's worth "$120 billion per year"? - Brad Guth - Well I'm working on some synfuel plants right now. Once that is underway I will do some acquisitions in the US. I am not seeking outside investors or participation. Willie.Moo, I must say that Raytheon and General Electric N367G corporate 737-75(BBJ) jet is impressive. Is any part of it your's? I'm certain that Raytheon and General Electric have each taken advantage of every possible tax credit under the sun (and then some), in so much that basically that spendy aircraft has became owned by the public that had to pay extra tax so that those corporate folks didn't have to spend an actual red cent out of their deep pockets. Are you trying to suggest that you're well connected? When do I get a ride in that nifty N367G? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I was shown the jet at the 2006 NBAA annual meeting October '06 down in Florida by AVPRO. Since 1999 737 airframes go for $12 million and there were a lot of surplus, and since GE had fully depreciated this jet (it belonged to Jack Welch) I offered $16 million for it. AVPRO sales person laughed. They'd need at least $35 million. I pointed out that at $1900 per flight hour at $16 million they'd have zero dollars in the jet after depreciation allowances. After some negotiations I thought we agreed on $32. That after Delta Air Elite, whom I arranged to operate the jet for my Swiss Trust, said they could make $500,000 profit per week shuttling teams and VIPs to China in it during the 2008 Olympics. But before I could close on that, GE then fired AVPRO and hired a Florida biz jet reseller who told them they could get $65.5 million out of the 8 year old jet. New BBJs cost $64 million so I think this madness. The jet is still for sale. Boeing is selling their 2002 BBJ, and a BBJ slated for delivery in 2008 is being offered for sale. Rising oil prices and a general slow down in the US economy bode ill for the sale of these jets. I've gone back to my $16 million offer - which I think fair. Once I acquire a BBJ, you can certainly charter time on board for $11,000 an hour, 2 hour minimum. With a capacity of 14 that's less than $1,000 per hour per person. So, for a 2 hour flight you could take a team of 14 people 1,000 miles in a short period of time and get some business done en-route. Of course if you're talking about flying from LA to Sydney, or LA to Jakarta, with 14 people flying business class - you have 20 hours in flight each way which is non productive. And you're paying $20,000 per person - in business class. And you're paying $600 per hour for the folks you're flying around. So, that's 40 hours times $600 - which is another $24,000 - a total of $44,000 per person. Do this twice per month, and you're talking $88,000 per person, and 14 people $1.23 million per month on air travel of critical people. At $32 million acquisition cost - that's $640,000 per month plus 80 flight hours per month - at $2,000 per hour - another $160,000 - a total of $800,000 - a savings of $430,000 per month from the business class flights for 14 people. With an 8 year depreciation schedule that's another $333,000 off per month - and interest payment deductions and so forth - you can see having a jet to keep your teams on task - and productive in transit which is invaluable. Add to this two flights per month, another 60 rentable hours at $11,000 per hour - for the Chinese olympics - and that's another $660,000 of income - which reduces costs dramatically.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You'd best acquire that BBJ as being from a certain offshore phosphate/ guano island nation of Nauru (aka NASA/Apollo moon landing site), perhaps regestered as part owned by Dick Cheney or Henry Kissinger, so that there'll never be any of those pesky future questions to avoid. The cost of jet fuel at perhaps $5.50 or even $7.00 per gallon (including all local and federal tax) is not a problem if you are rich and powerful, as you simply adjust your cost of living by putting your hands more frequently into that offshore cookie jar, which of course always has to include enough cookies for the ownership and operations of that BBJ as one of those essential perks of your business, even though your business doesn't actually require any such BBJ. - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - These assets are acquired by a company that is set up off-shore by a holding company that holds all my business assets off-shore. Personal assets are something else. The off-shore company then leases the jet to me as it does to any other qualified users, but my costs are offset by my credits earned - which is not income unless and until I spend the income for me personally which is the proper thing to do. Your comments about cookie jars and moon landing sites are non- sequitous and make no sense whatever. |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Laws
On Nov 1, 7:22 pm, wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:29 pm, BradGuth wrote: You'd best acquire that BBJ as being from a certain offshore phosphate/ guano island nation of Nauru (aka NASA/Apollo moon landing site), perhaps regestered as part owned by Dick Cheney or Henry Kissinger, so that there'll never be any of those pesky future questions to avoid. The cost of jet fuel at perhaps $5.50 or even $7.00 per gallon (including all local and federal tax) is not a problem if you are rich and powerful, as you simply adjust your cost of living by putting your hands more frequently into that offshore cookie jar, which of course always has to include enough cookies for the ownership and operations of that BBJ as one of those essential perks of your business, even though your business doesn't actually require any such BBJ. - Brad Guth These assets are acquired by a company that is set up off-shore by a holding company that holds all my business assets off-shore. Personal assets are something else. The off-shore company then leases the jet to me as it does to any other qualified users, but my costs are offset by my credits earned - which is not income unless and until I spend the income for me personally which is the proper thing to do. Hmmmm, just like Dick Cheney and of his warlord puppet GW Bush. In other words, the rich and powerful like yourself do not pay those income or most other taxes. Instead the rest of us snookered village idiots get to pick up the slak created by those of your spendy kind. Your comments about cookie jars and moon landing sites are non- sequitous and make no sense whatever. Spoken like the warm and fuzzy pretend atheists that you are. And the typical usenet contributions of naysayism and/or of topic/ author bashings or banishment by those in charge of our private parts (including those of yours) is going exactly according to their Zion plan of global domination action, isn't it. (or is it those pesky ETs in charge of most everything?) BTW, plan on your Jet-A fuel costing $10/gallon at most international airports by the end of this year. Perhaps you can park that fancy BBJ in some trailer park, and rent it out as a spendy office or private convention space that's available by the hour. Meanwhile, the Muslim oil in Iraq is still accessible at roughly $1/barrel, but only if you pay that loot to the right folks. Of course with the US$ value falling like a bloody rock, perhaps $2/barrel is a safer bet. How about our investing in a few of those black market oil tankers, as made stealth as Muslim WMD by our advanced technology, that can sneak in and out of Iraq's limited sea port? - Brad Guth - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Laws of Nature | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | January 2nd 07 10:31 PM |
80/f5 For the In-Laws | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 3rd 05 12:55 AM |
IP in china worse than no laws at all | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | February 24th 05 03:02 AM |
Kepler's laws and trajectories | tetrahedron | Astronomy Misc | 2 | March 27th 04 05:31 AM |
Kepler's laws | Michael McNeil | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 23rd 04 04:45 PM |