|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ronald Reagan mostly responsible for the space shuttle challenger tragedy. Gotta beat those Ruskies
Let history show that it was Reagan who said that the show must go on,
that the challenger (aka Skytrain #1) had to go up come hell or high water so the Ruskies would not leapfrog the Amerikkkans in the space competition. Their blood (well, dust, actually) was on his hands. Another thing to remember the great communicator for - another negative legacy to remember him by. A tribute to Reagan's true motivations and character. Posted to all these groups because all of you have been discussing one and/or the other of them and I just thought I would reiterate it for youse. And this I do pray in my God's name, (Your) diddy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"You Gonna Get A Spankin'" wrote in message m... Let history show that it was Reagan who said that the show must go on, that the challenger (aka Skytrain #1) had to go up come hell or high water LaToya? Is that you? You and "scott" and Stuffie look alike these days. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:01:53 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
wrote: "You Gonna Get A Spankin'" wrote in message om... Let history show that it was Reagan who said that the show must go on, that the challenger (aka Skytrain #1) had to go up come hell or high water LaToya? Is that you? You and "scott" and Stuffie look alike these days. ....And they all sound like Paul Maxson in drag, too. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Jun 2004 13:51:01 -0700, (You Gonna
Get A Spankin') wrote: Posted to all these groups because all of you have been discussing one and/or the other of them and I just thought I would reiterate it for youse. ^^^^^^ ....Not just a yankee, but a Damnyankee. Get a rope. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:05:02 -0500, Brian Thorn
wrote: On 16 Jun 2004 13:51:01 -0700, (You Gonna Get A Spankin') wrote: Let history show that it was Reagan who said that the show must go on, that the challenger (aka Skytrain #1) had to go up come hell or high water so the Ruskies would not leapfrog the Amerikkkans in the space competition. Ah, summer! The long, warm days. Children playing in the park, Baseball on the tube... ...and the crackpots start posting to sci.space again! ....Where the **** have you been? LaDeranged has been spewing her smegma-laced lies for almost three weeks now. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Thorn wrote in message . ..
On 16 Jun 2004 13:51:01 -0700, (You Gonna Get A Spankin') wrote: Let history show that it was Reagan who said that the show must go on, that the challenger (aka Skytrain #1) had to go up come hell or high water so the Ruskies would not leapfrog the Amerikkkans in the space competition. Ah, summer! The long, warm days. Children playing in the park, Baseball on the tube... ...and the crackpots start posting to sci.space again! Brian STOP THE MUSIC!!! I HATE like you-know-what to be a NASA apologist here, but Control makes that final go/no-go for launch. NOT the President, not God. I wish I knew the name of the stupid son-of-a-b**** who gave that final "go", because he (at the VERY least) launched against protocol that morning. If he allowed political pressure to force him into making a wrong decision that is on HIM--and as much of a die-hard rah-rah NASA person as Gene Kranz is, I'm sure he would agree with that assessment. Forget for a moment about o-rings and other theories. IT WAS TOO COLD!!! There are procedures for launch, and they are there for a reason. Lift-off should have been scrubbed. So, blame the right person. Like it or not, Challenger is on NASA. LaDonna |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
From LaDonna Wyss:
Brian Thorn wrote On 16 Jun 2004 13:51:01 -0700, (You Gonna Get A Spankin') wrote: Let history show that it was Reagan who said that the show must go on, that the challenger (aka Skytrain #1) had to go up come hell or high water so the Ruskies would not leapfrog the Amerikkkans in the space competition. Ah, summer! The long, warm days. Children playing in the park, Baseball on the tube... ...and the crackpots start posting to sci.space again! Brian STOP THE MUSIC!!! I HATE like you-know-what to be a NASA apologist here, but Control makes that final go/no-go for launch. NOT the President, not God. I wish I knew the name of the stupid son-of-a-b**** who gave that final "go", because he (at the VERY least) launched against protocol that morning. If he allowed political pressure to force him into making a wrong decision that is on HIM--and as much of a die-hard rah-rah NASA person as Gene Kranz is, I'm sure he would agree with that assessment. Forget for a moment about o-rings and other theories. IT WAS TOO COLD!!! There are procedures for launch, and they are there for a reason. Lift-off should have been scrubbed. So, blame the right person. Like it or not, Challenger is on NASA. That's what's so shocking, LaDonna. MOD has never been held accountable for their failure to scrub 51-L. Management has been cited. Thiokol has been cited. But the Launch Director, Flight Director and others with operational control authority have been... *PROMOTED*! The very people who called -Go- for launch on that icy morning are today *running NASA*. Did you know that Gene Kranz himself was in the MOCR during the poll? His book about the wonders of Mission Control read to me like it's missing a few chapters. Total hypocrisy when he stresses accountability for decisions on other missions and then side-steps any owning up to his sitting there watching the trigger get pulled. While astronauts die, the teflon shield around MOD keeps certain folks well protected. Just now an idea came to me on how to help ensure crew safety... For every launch, place one of the Ascent Flight Director's children in the spacecraft as an additional crew member. How many Flight Directors would have launched 51-L knowing that it was their kid? For that matter, how many Flight Directors would have launched -107 ?! For the anniversary of STS-107, Wayne Hale, one of the *very few* people in the history of NASA who have been Ascent Flight Directors, wrote a very powerful message about owning up to mistakes. ....except he never owned up to the one mistake that was the most fatal: launching Columbia. Recall that two launches prior to -107, a large foam chunk broke off during the launch of STS-112 and it damaged the vehicle. NASA pressed ahead. No one in MOD halted the program. Wayne Hale himself did not stop STS-113. He did not stop STS-107. No mention of any of this in his otherwise bold letter. ~ CT |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... I HATE like you-know-what to be a NASA apologist here But you're so *good* at being an apologist- just ask Betty! Forget for a moment about o-rings and other theories. IT WAS TOO COLD!!! At the time, there was no data that it was too cold to launch, and without such data that would not have been a good reason to cancel the launch. What *would* have been a good reason, and in fact was the reason why some engineers pushed for the cancellation, was that there was no data (not even test data) that supported launches under the existing temperature conditions. In short, it's not that there was no data against it, it was a bad idea to launch because there was no data *for* it. If, for example, it was humidity and not temperature that was the issue, there would rightfully have been less concern, because humidity hadn't shown itself to be a factor. There *was* data showing the effects of differing temperatures, but there was none for as low as the temperature was that morning. Perhaps it's the engineer in my soul, but with the launch conditions outside of the known range of success, if the boring eggheads had been in charge, Challenger would still be flying. Whoever said "take off your engineering hat and put on your management hat" should have been forced to personally crawl from whereever he said that to the home of each of the relatives of the astronauts and personally deliver an apology. Something you might seriously consider spending some time contemplating, LaToya, is that changing hats doesn't change the data. *That* is why we ask for verifiable references. We want to see the data *without* your spin. A refusal to consider the evidence against the preferred result then killed people, and in your case, it makes you look like a kook. Like it or not, Challenger is on NASA. And some of it was on the beach, and some of it was in the water, and some of it is on the sea floor... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Policy | 145 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 05:29 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
Challenger/Columbia, here is your chance to gain a new convert! | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 38 | September 5th 03 07:48 PM |