#61
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:26:56 GMT, Bruce Palmer wrote:
Herb Schaltegger wrote: In article , * wrote: Abuse complaint filed. AOL Me too. /AOL You don't have to do that. Lockheed will just use Echelon to censor me. HAHAHAHA. Cowards! It algol lets me know the power of the pen is much mightier that the sword. And further verifies Lockheed paranoia. I love it. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:07:55 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 04:39:39 GMT, * wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 02:33:29 GMT, Wally Anglesea™ wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:29:21 GMT, * wrote: On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: The proprietary period also allows the scientists to remove instrument noise and to calibrate the data properly. Liar. Oh, the IRONY. You are the biggest liar to have posted oin usnet in ages. Proof? Yes, Every one of your psots. Google is your friend. To the sci. heir achy, welcome to Alexa, Ah yes, every time you get paranoid you mention Alexa. You hat it when another suck poppet is exploded don't you., kook? I'm not being paid to post to Usenet. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:50:04 -0500, "Scott Hedrick"
wrote: In article , * wrote: And this is what NASA/Lockheed are hiding: 1. Hoagland a fraud. NASA is making no attempt whatsoever to hide this. Hoagland proves it himself with every statement. That's what he's being paid to do. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
$ wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:26:56 GMT, Bruce Palmer wrote: Herb Schaltegger wrote: In article , * wrote: Abuse complaint filed. AOL Me too. /AOL You don't have to do that. Lockheed will just use Echelon to censor me. HAHAHAHA. Cowards! It algol lets me know the power of the pen is much mightier that the sword. And further verifies Lockheed paranoia. I love it. I've already filed a second abuse report. Should I file a third? And, btw, your posts are coming through loud and clear, your fears of censorship to the contrary. However, they are entirely off-topic and off-charter for the sci.space newsgroups and THAT'S why people are objecting. Confine your lunacy to the alt.* groups and no one will care. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Columbia Loss FAQ: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message news:herbschaltegger- I've already filed a second abuse report. Should I file a third? And, btw, your posts are coming through loud and clear, your fears of censorship to the contrary. However, they are entirely off-topic and off-charter for the sci.space newsgroups and THAT'S why people are objecting. Confine your lunacy to the alt.* groups and no one will care. Well, that's not ENTIRELY true Herb. If he actually posted verifable evidence, he'd be welcomed with open arms. I mean I think I speak for most sci.space folks that if there were REAL evidence of life on Mars we'd love to hear it. But as long as he spouts nonsense, I agree. He can stay with the alt.* groups. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Columbia Loss FAQ: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
* writes:
On 16 Mar 2004 18:07:07 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: The data format has been published. Looking it up would require some actual research in a library looking at journals, however, which may be beyond your limited capabilities. You'd probably have to write some software to do it, though there's an outside chance that Malin would give it to you. You keep making this out to be harder than it is. Translation: no one has the programs to retrieve the raw Mars photographs but Malin. And you clearly lack the skills to write a simple program to transform data from one format to another. This is one of the *easiest* types of programs to write. I've written dozens of such programs over the last 15 years or so. About half for "fun" and about half for work. You don't even need a "modern" programming language to write this sort of code. C would be my choice, but just about any other language that has reasonably complete libraries for file I/O would suffice. You don't even need a UI for such programs. Just run it from the command line since the only input is the file to process. I'm not saying that you personally need to write the code, but anyone with a B.S. in Computer Science (or the equivalent experience) would be able to write such a program in short order (not just Malin). Jeff -- Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply. If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
"*" wrote in message Okay smart ass, why are the MOC photos coded during transmission from Mars Because to digitally store or transmit images they need to be encoded in some sort of format. To transmit them, furthermore, there needs to be further encoding to be able to detect and correct errors during transmission. Conceptually, its no different than fax transmission in the 60s. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message news:herbschaltegger- I've already filed a second abuse report. Should I file a third? And, btw, your posts are coming through loud and clear, your fears of censorship to the contrary. However, they are entirely off-topic and off-charter for the sci.space newsgroups and THAT'S why people are objecting. Confine your lunacy to the alt.* groups and no one will care. Well, that's not ENTIRELY true Herb. If he actually posted verifable evidence, he'd be welcomed with open arms. I mean I think I speak for most sci.space folks that if there were REAL evidence of life on Mars we'd love to hear it. But as long as he spouts nonsense, I agree. He can stay with the alt.* groups. Yeah, you're right. As it stands, however, he's spouting Guth-like nonsense combined with Maxson-like anti-NASA/anti-Lockheed paranoia and hostility. The best, most intellectually-honest and interesting sources of information regarding possible ancient life on Mars is probably contained in the sites noted by JimO in his "F-word" (e.g., fossils) column last week. Very interesting stuff there. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Columbia Loss FAQ: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
I have listened to Hoagland talk about the face on Mars and so on. It was a
challenge to try to figure out whether he was a fraud ( putting on a performance) or if he was mentally unbalanced. I have noticed that he now prefaces his presentations with lengthy allegations of conspiracy to hide information, that NASA knows but doesn't want you to know. So I think that this is strong evidence of paranoia and is symptomatic of a delusional crank. A sort of functioning lunatic. His recent descriptions of Mars rocks as relics of ancient machined parts did not go over well. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hoagland a fraud? | * | Policy | 129 | March 30th 04 06:20 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |