#51
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
On Apr 2, 6:15 am, wrote:
Nice folks these born-again via incest cloned borgs of the Third Reich, and mostly Jewish to boot. What's alt.snuh? - Brad Guth And the cesspool of all that's MI/NSA~NASA is still flowing nicely up hill, just as though it had some special Jewish powers within all of its infomercial spewed crapolla. - Brad Guth |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
Venus L2 is in fact cool to the naked touch. However, Venus itself is
not the least bit too hot to touch with the Ovglove. That is as long as you don't run yourself out of ice cold beer and pizza, in that I really don't see all that much of a problem. As long as you've got way more spare/renewable energy at your disposal than you could possibly know what to do with, and having that nifty thermal suit made by Ovglove, where's the big-ass insurmountable problem with taking that hot-foot of a toasty stroll on Venus? CO2--CO/O2 is not hardly a technical problem, hasn't been for a good decade or more. Pure H2O as easily extracted from those somewhat cool nighttime acidic clouds (above the S8 layer) is simply another mission positive win- win. The 65 kg/m3 worth of buoyancy as working along with the 90.5% gravity is offering a couple of other nifty factors that'll work rather well for your composite rigid airship (just like on behalf of those Venusian composite rigid airships). If you're any damn good at PhotoShop, goto: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/ http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm or best you start with your very own look-see at the following official image site: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif The 36 look per pixel of that primary GIF image format starts getting downright interesting at being 3X resampled, and then giving it all the best PhotoShop or whatever else you can muster, although the original GIF 1:1 image was actually good enough for my PhotoShop configured brain to deductively interpret upon what's most likely artificial as opposed to what's perfectly natural. 36 looks per pixel is offering a lot of truthworthy image data to start with, so it's a good one to stick with rather than dealing with their individual 75 meter/pixel versions as having combined but four looks per pixel. Don't try to process the entire image unless you've got one heck of a nifty PC or MAC. Try clipping out only the small portion of the total image that's roughly a third up from the bottom and just to the right of center, as we're talking about utilizing less than 10% or perhaps even as little as 5% of that primary GIF image, and to process upon just that much shouldn't traumatise your memory or performance PC or MAC. I'll review each of your results, that by rights should become a whole lot better than mine. Obviously anyone can over/under force those PhotoShop refinements, well past the point of no return, so don't do that. My extremely old version of PhotoShop can't hardly accomplish much better than 8X resampling without losing ground, and besides, we don't actually require much better than 6X for most others to see most clearly what I'd first interpreted from the original 1:1 format. Thanks once again to 'tomcat' for also having posted this updated page of Venus images. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html It's image No.17 from the top left being the one that so happens to include the robust, sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH Venus'. "Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1" http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif - Brad Guth |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
On Apr 4, 5:21 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article .com, wrote: Venus L2 is in fact cool to the naked touch Only on bizarro-world. I got less than 400 w/m2, and your VL2 solar isolation is ????????????? - Brad Guth |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
news In article .com, wrote: I got less clue then a braindead lemming? Are you and others of your silly kind having another bad jewboy day? As otherwise VL2 is in fact cool, and Venus itself isn't worse off than what a good Ovglove body-suit could safely manage. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
In article
lgate.org, "Brad Guth" wrote: Are you and others tired of reading your screed? Why yes. -- Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB: "Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly. I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish." |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
OOPS! Now I've gone and insulted the Ovgolve cult of mindless
morons. Sorry about that. Perhaps Venus is simply too freaking hot to touch, even with the Ovglove. Within an average of having been losing 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 1e16 watts continuously available at the core), represents that some areas of the Venus surface are perhaps worth less than a w/m2, with other areas radiating at perhaps 200 w/m2, and of course more than a few active mud, lava and gas vents contributing their energy at many thousands of watts per square meter. So, the Ovglove applications are at best spotty, and along with the IR CCD or most likely using of some other thermally tolerant instrument of such technology at hand, there's no good reason to think of our having to walk on those extra toasty locations where the heat of what's geothermally forced is excessively pushing the limits of those EVA Ovglove suits as intended and thus configured for keeping their folks cool. Technically it is much tougher to get rid of surplus heat than it is for insulating yourself from the cold. However, the double IR/FIR environment of our daytime moon that's physically dark and nasty in more ways than passive heat, such as for benefiting those sorts of robust robotic instruments that'll have to survive the solar IR plus all of the locally reflected IR and of the secondary/recoil worth of the mid and far infrared(FIR), should more than apply to this application of such robotics and perhaps a few brave souls safely accomplishing Venus. In fact the moon's secondary/recoil worth of what's near, mid and far infrared combined is likely worth every bit as much as the solar influx, though fortunately our Venus surface by season of nighttime is without solar IR to begin with, and even by day there's not all that much solar IR that ever reaches that S8 and acidic h2o cloud protected surface. There's obviously more to behold and appreciate about all the NIR, MIF and FIR spectrums of our universe than there is from our biologically limited if not evolution deprived visual spectrum (there are bugs, more than a few other significant species including birds that actually see much better than us humans) http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/Outreach...irregions.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared Our seeing by night while exploring or otherwise doing our business of depositing or extracting whatever from Venus is not the least bit of a compromise, or is it outside of most any thermal environment spec. Cruising Venus by way of a suitable composite rigid airship is just downright nifty, and rather energy efficient to boot. - Brad Guth |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
How cool is VL2
On Apr 5, 3:13 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article . com, wrote: OOPS! Now I've gone and posted more screed? You've hit the magic #69 I'm not exactly sure; is that good or bad? - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
very cool | ROC | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | June 28th 05 06:00 AM |
COOL | www.ultravideo.fr.st | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 29th 04 04:44 AM |
COOL | www.ultravideo.fr.st | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 29th 04 04:44 AM |
Cool! | Sally | Misc | 3 | November 27th 03 01:21 PM |
Cool! | Sally | UK Astronomy | 2 | November 27th 03 12:56 PM |