Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

"doug" wrote in message
et...

[...]

# 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of
exit in the Cartesian coordinate system?

Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. Lots of misplaced anxiety.

You lack substance in your allegations hence making them invalid. The
Einstein-Rosen Bridge is an attempt to haunt our minds for eternity because
it can never be disproved. Not only it is part of the false hopes
propaganda generated by Einstein and maintained for a century but is totally
without any practical use even if it was true.

This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can
actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can
wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a
scientific argument.

What's really hilarious is seeing you trying to defend with conviction
something without any substance, value and logic. According to you Einstein
is the only one allowed to make paradoxes tangible and deadlocks logical in
the science department.

Maybe this is an attempt to make the fidels believe they are smarter than
the rest of the world.

[...]

Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. Try again.

Relativity isn't fine and needs to be replaced.

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...

In this group of mostly incest mutated mindsets, sadly you'll not get
very far.

Indeed their comments are anything else than scientific at this stage. I
have more work awaiting in algorithms for parallel computation using the
theory and discussions with mathematicians anyways.

On Mar 19, 1:22*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"doug" wrote in message

et...

[...]

# 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of
exit in the Cartesian coordinate system?

Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. *Lots of misplaced anxiety.

You lack substance in your allegations hence making them invalid. *The
Einstein-Rosen Bridge is an attempt to haunt our minds for eternity because
it can never be disproved. *Not only it is part of the false hopes
propaganda generated by Einstein and maintained for a century but is totally
without any practical use even if it was true.

This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can
actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can
wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a
scientific argument.

What's really hilarious is seeing you trying to defend with conviction
something without any substance, value and logic. *According to you Einstein
is the only one allowed to make paradoxes tangible and deadlocks logical in
the science department.

Maybe this is an attempt to make the fidels believe they are smarter than
the rest of the world.

[...]

Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. *Try again.

Relativity isn't fine and needs to be replaced.

Relativity occupied a useless and redundant position. No replacement
is necessary. Straight to the trash bin it goes.

On Mar 18, 10:22 pm, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:

Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. Try again.

Relativity isn't fine and needs to be replaced.

There is medication for the severe delusions, you should ask your
doctor to increase your dosage.

"Dono" wrote in message
...

There is medication for the severe delusions, you should ask your
doctor to increase your dosage.

Even my doctor agrees.

On Mar 19, 7:33 am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"Dono" wrote in message

...



There is medication for the severe delusions, you should ask your
doctor to increase your dosage.

Even my doctor agrees.



So, have him increased your dosage. It might help with your delusions.

On Mar 19, 10:24*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Dorn.Strich wrote:

Relativity occupied a useless and redundant position. *No replacement
is necessary. *Straight to the trash bin it goes.

* *Translation: David doesn't understand relativity.

Translation: Wormley does not understand quantum mechanics and finds
comfort in the simple childish geometry of relativity.

Example: Wormley cannot grasp non-locality, a feature of quantum
mechanics which relativity is clueless about.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

"doug" wrote in message
et...

[...]


# 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of
exit in the Cartesian coordinate system?

Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. Lots of misplaced anxiety.


You lack substance in your allegations hence making them invalid. The
Einstein-Rosen Bridge is an attempt to haunt our minds for eternity because
it can never be disproved. Not only it is part of the false hopes
propaganda generated by Einstein and maintained for a century but is totally
without any practical use even if it was true.

In other words, you feel it cannot be true since you do not like it.


This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can
actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can
wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a
scientific argument.


What's really hilarious is seeing you trying to defend with conviction
something without any substance, value and logic.

You are trying to attack relativity without even knowing what it
says. Those kind of ignorant attacks will always fail.

According to you Einstein
is the only one allowed to make paradoxes tangible and deadlocks logical in
the science department.

There are no paradoxes in relativity.

Maybe this is an attempt to make the fidels believe they are smarter than
the rest of the world.

The world does not care what a CS guy delusions are. The world is the
way it is.

[...]


Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. Try again.


Relativity isn't fine and needs to be replaced.

No, there is no evidence of that except that you do not like
it. The world is not going to change for you.

On Mar 19, 7:58*am, "Dorn.Strich" wrote:
On Mar 19, 10:24*am, Sam Wormley wrote:

Dorn.Strich wrote:

Relativity occupied a useless and redundant position. *No replacement
is necessary. *Straight to the trash bin it goes.

* *Translation: David doesn't understand relativity.

Translation: Wormley does not understand quantum mechanics and finds
comfort in the simple childish geometry of relativity.

Describe the WKB approximation in your own words.

Explain what Berry's phase is, and how it is related to the WKB
approximation.

If you can't do either of those, you don't really 'understand' quantum
mechanics nearly as much as you think you do.


Example: Wormley cannot grasp non-locality, a feature of quantum
mechanics which relativity is clueless about.

Example: Dave cannot answer questions about QM that require non-
shallow levels of study and understanding.
Example: Dave can't solve any QM system.
Example: Dave doesn't know what a wave function is.

On Mar 19, 12:10*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Mar 19, 7:58*am, "Dorn.Strich" wrote:

On Mar 19, 10:24*am, Sam Wormley wrote:

Dorn.Strich wrote:

Relativity occupied a useless and redundant position. *No replacement
is necessary. *Straight to the trash bin it goes.

* *Translation: David doesn't understand relativity.

Translation: Wormley does not understand quantum mechanics and finds
comfort in the simple childish geometry of relativity.

Describe the WKB approximation in your own words.

Explain what Berry's phase is, and how it is related to the WKB
approximation.

If you can't do either of those, you don't really 'understand' quantum
mechanics nearly as much as you think you do.



Example: Wormley cannot grasp non-locality, a feature of quantum
mechanics which relativity is clueless about.

Example: Dave cannot answer questions about QM that require non-
shallow levels of study and understanding.
Example: Dave can't solve any QM system.
Example: Dave doesn't know what a wave function is.

Watch Eric display the full spectrum of symptoms of anti-social
personality disorder. He throws those questions as if they are
rocks. One can almost feel the aggression in his reply. I am amused
how the flunkie student has the nerve to start asking questions.

Since we are merely throwing questions, here is a little one for the
flunkie: How can you reconcile quantum non-locality with relativistic
locality?