Propulsion Applied Electrogravitic Crystallography

The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud. Radiation results in
the flow of ions from negative electron clouds to these posi-
tive "clouds", resulting in "current". Since this reaction is
almost instantaneous, one would be required to create a "bot-
tled" effect over the positronic cloud, in order to "filter
out" any of the field effects that are induced by a magneto-
fluxgate, by "tuning the coils" to resonate (chirp) at specific
frequencies that are non-naturally resonant with some
preselected, polarized substance (e.g., Bi-IV).

The tuned, near-resonance, nuclear magneton dipole moment must be
solved from the following equation:

Me**jwt = [(e**2)/m][E_0*e**jwt/[(w_0**2)-w**2 + jwg]]

(where w_0 = resonant frequency chosen to be within the magic
window) and plugging into the formula for the resulting
magnetic field:

H_phi=[jwMk**2/4(pi)][(e**j(wt-kr))sin(theta)[j/kr+1/(kr)**2]

The null vector is defined as the time vector, with 1/(phi)
the radius of torsion, which is equivalent to the amount of
time dilation for respective wave numbers, a torsion line is
traced through a pseudosphere vortex that is wide enough
(because of the stretched space), to accommodate a large
group velocity of waves @ V C, when increasing series of
parallel LRC networks are used to "store" a filtered
signal system for resonance degaussing [11].

The amount of curvature in hyperspace requires an equation
that describes the energy momentum tensor:

R_mv - ½ g_mv R = [ 8(pi) / c**2 ] GT_m *(nue)

This is an Einsteinian formula applicable for classical physics
and also describes the curvature of a 5 dimensional universe
in 6 dimensional spacetime, where R = k_(v,w) / alpha, k_(v,w)=
sectional curvature of M at P (Note 1), determined by the tangent
vectors v and w. The spacetime metric, g_mv, or g_mv(it) can be
forced to accomodate magnetic monopole decompression,
if perturbations of r(it) AWAY FROM r_0 grow exponentially,
causing separation from the current spacetime sheet. The DeWitt
Schwinger method provides an expansion of spacetime derivatives
of r(it), directly affecting the spacetime metric, g_mv(it).
These are modes of spacetime-dependent deformation of bosonic
space, where a pair of bipolar bosons constitute a graviton,
or unit of gravity. Gravitational resonance AWAY from perfect
sphericity is directly related to 4-space dilation AWAY from
the current timeline.

Note 1: If all sectional curvatures, at every P (an element of)
M, have the same value, M is a Riemanian manifold of constant
curvature. Constant negative curvature is represented by a
torus, as well as constant positive curvature. Alpha depends
on the length of v and w and the length between them, g_mv =
Riemann metric = -2, R = scalar field curvature constant =
R_ii = g_ij R_ij, where g_ij = G_ij / g_mv , (I, j
interchangable w/ m, v), where G_ij = gravitational constant
= 6.67 x 10-8 cm**3 / gm-sec**2, and T_m*(nue) is the energy
momentum tensor, which measures the matter-energy content.

Tracing a line, or torsion, corresponds to the rate of change
in the direction of the binormal, or lambda, represented by
d(phi) / ds, where (phi) is the angle through which the
binormal turns, and ds is the time increment. The null vector
can be either future directed or past directed. By adding
boundaries to a set of spacetime manifolds, it is possible
to define past (and future) null infinities for such systems.

The solution to the above field equation for spherically
symmetric mass distribution at rest is called the Schwartzchild
solution. To meet the requirement for spherical symmetry, any
solution to the above equation must involve only those
combinations of x, y, z, dx, dy, and dz that are left
invariant by spatial rotations. For the torus screw theory,
there are incremental jumps (360o phase at 0.5 x 10**-43
seconds each, representing our time line on the circumference
of a torus) that represent the invariant conditions required
for the Schwartzchild solution:

ds**2 = [ 1 - 2GM / r ] dt**2 - dr**2 / [ 1 - 2GM / r ] -

(r**2)d (theta)**2 - (r**2)(sin**2)*(theta)d(phi)**2

The value for ds**2 represents the unit value for fifth
dimensional space time curvature, the so-called Riemann
curvature ( R_m(nue) ), which is the curvature of a space
time bubble in hyperspace, whose diameter is equal to the
crossectional diameter of one leg of the torus of time.

One half of this diameter being equal to the value for r_0,
or the spacetime-independent equilibrium radius of S**N, and
the "kinetic term" for the pilot wave, r(it), as the field on
spacetime (mentioned further above as being equal to one half
the amplitude in one of the four possibilities).

A value for ds**2 is found so that a spiral 'cutout' for the
desired time dialation ( + or - ) is applied using the
gravitational collapse radius r(it) for a chosen mass.

Theoretically, there exists only an imaginary mass of
particles entering a wormhole, but which also contain the
minimum negative energy at the event horizon, corresponding
to the kinetic and potential scalar energy entering, with
simultaneous radiation of total outer shell spectral emission
of photon energy over the event horizon (and quite possibly
within the ergosphere, described below) taking place. For a
rotating black hole, the ergosphere is the region between
the event horizon and the static limit, the oblate surface
that surrounds the horizon, touching it only at the poles
of the rotation axis. Event horizons are discussed regularly
when talking about the topology of hyperspace, and how future,
past, and present worlds affect each other. There is a growing
group of scientists who believe that the properties of the
spacetime in which we live are stably causal; that is,
ordinary causality has an absence of closed timelike curves.
A closed timelike curve has no connections with nearby
spacetimes, but a connection with nearby spacetimes is
physically reasonable if and only if it is stably causal.
This property of space-time would allow the same particle
to exist in two different locations simultaneously (in the
fourth dimension), but at different spacetimes (in the fifth
dimension), yet even free will could not allow these particles
to come in contact with each other without mutual destruction.

A pulse polarized probe beam acting on a quadrupolarized
diamond Bi_4 crystal can operate either as a 4-space trans-
port, or space-time transport, depending on the type of
subsummation described above. An attractor's phase space
may also be represented by an INFOLDING self-organizing
circumvolution cissoid (2*pi*F)**v, where F represents the
Fibonacci series number with v = 0,1,2,3,... representing
the wave number. What does each infolded cissoid look like?
How about a tachyonic lightcone? The 4-SPACE POINTS con-
necting the beginning and end of the "spiraled cissoid"
ARE WITHIN THE LIGHTCONE, and represent unpolarized
TARDYONS, the infamous particles which travel less than
the speed of light. The particles traveling AT the speed
of light travel along the surface of the cone. Tachyons
travel OUTSIDE THE LIGHTCONES and are ABSORBED B4
THEY ARE EMITTED. TIME REVERSAL OCCURS WHENEVER
PARTICULAR OBSERVER SENSES TACHYONIC ENERGY
TURNS NEGATIVE. TACHYONS ARE 'MEMORY' PARTICLES,
AWAITING EITHER THEIR INFORMATION *COMPASS* OR
*CRISIS*. IT'S THE BASIS FOR QUANTUM "WEIRDNESS".

"Weird" is what happens when phase velocity of the field
patterns (equal to c x lambda_g / lambda) increases to the
point that the negative propogation time creates a signal
reception at the reciever BEFORE the pulse is seen to be
leaving the transmission cell. The negative time differ-
ence would then be:

- Delta T = -(r_f/V_g - r_f/c ) = -(n_g - 1)r_f/c

where n_g represents a group velocity index in the formula
V_g = c/n_g, and r_f is the RADII of the specified WAVE
PACKET, equal to the AMPLITUDE (described above as the
WAVELENGTH PHASE SPACE), for which we have included the
TACHYONIC LIGHTCONE OF SPIRALED CISSOID 4-SPACE,
where the diameters of the LIGHTCONES equal 2 times the pole
height (zeta pole + phase conjugated zeta pole), and are
a measure of the disk diameter. Since there are two "disks",
one of the disks is an image of the other, forming an op-
posite "pole", with both poles projecting the "orthogonal
phase inversion" during pulse chirp amplification.

American

***

The aforementioned theory has no reference with current
propulsion technology espoused by NASA, no reference with
any current transportation technology espoused by any
Bureau of Transportation, Interstate, or International
Trade Agreement, no relationship whatsoever with any of
the branches of military or international militaries; no
affiliation with any political party other than the party
of a New Constitution with Sovereignity; no religious
affiliation with any religious organization or group that
has been recognized by any state or nation of states that
grant license to practice religion; and no affiliation
with any name or professional title of industry indicated
or implied herein.

The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud. Radiation results in
the flow of ions from negative electron clouds to these posi-
tive "clouds", resulting in "current". Since this reaction is
almost instantaneous, one would be required to create a "bot-
tled" effect over the positronic cloud, in order to "filter
out" any of the field effects that are induced by the magneto-
fluxgate, by "tuning the coils" to resonate (chirp) at specific
frequencies that are non-naturally resonant with some
preselected, polarized substance (e.g., Bi-IV).

The tuned, near-resonance, nuclear magneton dipole moment must
be solved first from the following equation:

Me**jwt = [(e**2)/m][E_0*e**jwt/[(w_0**2)-w**2 + jwg]]

(where w_0 = resonant frequency chosen to be within the magic
window) and plugging into the formula for the resulting
magnetic field:

H_phi=[jwMk**2/4(pi)][(e**j(wt-kr))sin(theta)[j/kr+1/(kr)**2]

The null vector is defined as the time vector, with 1/(phi)
the radius of torsion, which is equivalent to the amount of
time dilation for respective wave numbers, a torsion line is
traced through a pseudosphere vortex that is wide enough
(because of the stretched space), to accommodate a large
group velocity of waves @ V C, when increasing series of
parallel LRC networks are used to "store" a filtered
signal system for resonance degaussing [11].

The amount of curvature in hyperspace requires an equation
that describes the energy momentum tensor:

R_mv - ½ g_mv R = [ 8(pi) / c**2 ] GT_m *(nue)

This is an Einsteinian formula applicable for classical physics
and also describes the curvature of a 5 dimensional universe
in 6 dimensional spacetime, where R = k_(v,w) / alpha, k_(v,w)=
sectional curvature of M at P (Note 1), determined by the tangent
vectors v and w. The spacetime metric, g_mv, or g_mv(it) can be
forced to accomodate magnetic monopole resonance decompression,
if perturbations of r(it) AWAY FROM r_0 grow exponentially,
causing separation from the current spacetime sheet. The DeWitt
Schwinger method provides an expansion of spacetime derivatives
of r(it), directly affecting the spacetime metric, g_mv(it).
These are modes of spacetime-dependent deformation of bosonic
space, where a pair of bipolar bosons constitute a graviton,
or unit of gravity. Gravitational resonance AWAY from perfect
sphericity is directly related to 4-space dilation AWAY from
the current timeline.

Note 1: If all sectional curvatures, at every P (an element of)
M, have the same value, M is a Riemanian manifold of constant
curvature. Constant negative curvature is represented by a
torus, as well as constant positive curvature. Alpha depends
on the length of v and w and the length between them, g_mv =
Riemann metric = -2, R = scalar field curvature constant =
R_ii = g_ij R_ij, where g_ij = G_ij / g_mv , (I, j
interchangable w/ m, v), where G_ij = gravitational constant
= 6.67 x 10-8 cm**3 / gm-sec**2, and T_m*(nue) is the energy
momentum tensor, which measures the matter-energy content.

Tracing a line, or torsion, corresponds to the rate of change
in the direction of the binormal, or lambda, represented by
d(phi) / ds, where (phi) is the angle through which the
binormal turns, and ds is the time increment. The null vector
can be either future directed or past directed. By adding
boundaries to a set of spacetime manifolds, it is possible
to define past (and future) null infinities for such systems.

The solution to the above field equation for spherically
symmetric mass distribution at rest is called the Schwartzchild
solution. To meet the requirement for spherical symmetry, any
solution to the above equation must involve only those
combinations of x, y, z, dx, dy, and dz that are left
invariant by spatial rotations. For the torus screw theory,
there are incremental jumps (360o phase at 0.5 x 10**-43
seconds each, representing our time line on the circumference
of a torus) that represent the invariant conditions required
for the Schwartzchild solution:

ds**2 = [ 1 - 2GM / r ] dt**2 - dr**2 / [ 1 - 2GM / r ] -

(r**2)d (theta)**2 - (r**2)(sin**2)*(theta)d(phi)**2

The value for ds**2 represents the unit value for fifth
dimensional space time curvature, the so-called Riemann
curvature ( R_m(nue) ), which is the curvature of a space
time bubble in hyperspace, whose diameter is equal to the
crossectional diameter of one leg of the torus of time.

One half of this diameter being equal to the value for r_0,
or the spacetime-independent equilibrium radius of S**N, and
the "kinetic term" for the pilot wave, r(it), as the field on
spacetime (mentioned further above as being equal to one half
the amplitude in one of the four possibilities).

A value for ds**2 is found so that a spiral 'cutout' for the
desired time dialation ( + or - ) is applied using the
gravitational collapse radius r(it) for a chosen mass.

Theoretically, there exists only an imaginary mass of
particles entering a wormhole, but which also contain the
minimum negative energy at the event horizon, corresponding
to the kinetic and potential scalar energy entering, with
simultaneous radiation of total outer shell spectral emission
of photon energy over the event horizon (and quite possibly
within the ergosphere, described below) taking place. For a
rotating black hole, the ergosphere is the region between
the event horizon and the static limit, the oblate surface
that surrounds the horizon, touching it only at the poles
of the rotation axis. Event horizons are discussed regularly
when talking about the topology of hyperspace, and how future,
past, and present worlds affect each other. There is a growing
group of scientists who believe that the properties of the
spacetime in which we live are stably causal; that is,
ordinary causality has an absence of closed timelike curves.
A closed timelike curve has no connections with nearby
spacetimes, but a connection with nearby spacetimes is
physically reasonable if and only if it is stably causal.
This property of space-time would allow the same particle
to exist in two different locations simultaneously (in the
fourth dimension), but at different spacetimes (in the fifth
dimension), yet even free will could not allow these particles
to come in contact with each other without mutual destruction.

A pulse polarized probe beam acting on a quadrupolarized
diamond Bi_4 crystal can operate either as a 4-space trans-
port, or space-time transport, depending on the type of
subsummation described above. An attractor's phase space
may also be represented by an INFOLDING self-organizing
circumvolution cissoid (2*pi*F)**v, where F represents the
Fibonacci series number with v = 0,1,2,3,... representing
the wave number. What does each infolded cissoid look like?
How about a tachyonic lightcone? The 4-SPACE POINTS con-
necting the beginning and end of the "spiraled cissoid"
ARE WITHIN THE LIGHTCONE, and represent unpolarized
TARDYONS, the infamous particles which travel less than
the speed of light. The particles traveling AT the speed
of light travel along the surface of the cone. Tachyons
travel OUTSIDE THE LIGHTCONES and are ABSORBED BEFORE
THEY ARE EMITTED. TIME REVERSAL OCCURS WHENEVER A
PARTICULAR OBSERVER SENSES THAT TACHYONIC ENERGY
TURNS NEGATIVE. TACHYONS ARE LIKE 'MEMORY' PARTICLES,
AWAITING EITHER THEIR INFORMATION *COMPASS* OR
*CRISIS*. IT'S THE BASIS FOR QUANTUM "WEIRDNESS".

"Weird" is what happens when phase velocity of the field
patterns (equal to c x lambda_g / lambda) increases to the
point that the negative propogation time creates a signal
reception at the reciever BEFORE the pulse is seen to be
leaving the transmission cell. The negative time differ-
ence would then be:

- Delta T = -(r_f/V_g - r_f/c ) = -(n_g - 1)r_f/c

where n_g represents a group velocity index in the formula
V_g = c/n_g, and r_f is the RADII of the specified WAVE
PACKET, equal to the AMPLITUDE (described above as the
WAVELENGTH PHASE SPACE), for which we have included the
TACHYONIC LIGHTCONE OF SPIRALED CISSOID FOURSPACE,
where the diameters of the LIGHTCONES equal 2 times the pole
height (zeta pole + phase conjugated zeta pole), and are
a measure of the disk diameter. Since there are two "disks",
one of the disks is an image of the other, forming an op-
posite "pole", with both poles projecting the "orthogonal
phase inversion" during pulse chirp amplification.

PART II ***********************************************

e**At is found by first representing e**At in an infinite
series for A =

| 0 1 |
|-1 0 | times 5 (units of time), and T as it is used in the
formula Z(t) = e**(-i*I_d(t))] * zeta(1/2 + it):

1] (alpha_n-1)*[5(A)**(n-1)]+[(alpha_n-2)*[5(A)**(n-1)]+ ...
+ (alpha_2)*[(5A**2)(t**2)] + (alpha_1)5A*t + (alpha_0)I,
where (alpha_0), (alpha_1), ..., (alpha_n-1) are functions
of t that must be found. To find these values, we first com-
pute the eigenvalues of At, lambda_1, lambda_2, ...lambda_n.
For each eigenvalue we have

2] e**lambda_i = r*(lambda_i), where r*(lambda_i) =

3] (alpha_n-1)(lambda**(n-1)) + ... + (alpha_2)(lambda**2) +
(alpha_1)(lambda) + alpha_0.

The n eigenvalues of A result in n linear equations, through
equations 2 & 3, in unknowns alpha_0, alpha_1, .., alpha_n-1.
These solutions are then substituted into [1] which gives us
e**5At. According to [1], we have

[3A]

e**5At = (alpha_1)5A*t + (alpha_0)5I =

| 0 alpha_1*t | |alpha_0 0| |alpha_0 -alpha_1*t|
|-alpha_1*t 0 |+|0 alpha_0|=|-alpha_1*t alpha_0| (5's drop)

and [4]

5At =

| 0 (sqrt(5))t |
|-(sqrt(5))t 0 |

The eigenvalues of At are given by the characteristic equation

[5] det[(sqrt(5))At - (sqrt(5))I(lambda)] = 0.

Note that a square root of 5 (amplitude)*(t) is equal to a
square root of 5*(I)(wavelength). We have done this to show that
a 5*(I)(wavelength) WILL SUBSUME an AMPLITUDE that is AT AN
"NMR" FREQUENCY within the BANDWIDTH of the PHASE
CONJUGATED WAVEFORM, as long as we're using a dimunition
of frequency, that increases the phase velocity of the OUTGOING
WAVE, e.g., one may extract the lower sideband transmission,
utilize it as the new carrier frequency, and perform another phase
modulation to again increase phase velocity. This allows phase
velocities to increase in circuitry stages, depending on the neg-
ative values of n in a Bessel chart. Taking the value of r from
r = separation distance between transmitting antenna and
reciever, we have a new iteration taking place when a circuit
stage for the new carrier frequency is set up. Using DELTA_nue=
(nue_i)(GM)[1 / r_i - r_f] (from Gravitational redshift theory,
where nue = frequency), to measure the frequency shift, the new
value for the lower sideband of carrier frequency is used to
measure the value for r_f in a newer geodesic, i.e., a new
constant C in the expression C = 2GM. Note that as the carrier
frequency diminishes, the value for 2GM in the above expression
C = 2GM must compensate in order to balance the above equation
for DELTA_nue.

From [4] and [5], we have

[6]

|-(sqrt(5))lambda +(sqrt(5))t|
|-(sqrt(5))t -(sqrt(5))lambda| = 0, or 5*lambda**2 + 5*t**2 = 0.

From [6], lambda = plus or minus i*t, where i =sqrt(-1), hence

[7] e**it = r(it) = (alpha_1)*(it) + alpha_0, and
[8] e**-it = -r(it) = -(alpha_1)*(it) + alpha_0.

Equations [7] and [8] are a pair of complex simultaneous
equations. Both r(it) and -r(it) represent both whole and
subsumed waveforms, respectively, with r(it) representing the
4-space pilot wave and -r(it) the 4-space independent equilibrium
radius of S**N, or 7-sphere. Background spacetime is the direct
product of four dimensional Minkowski spacetime M**4, with
a 7-dimensional sphere, S**7, with constant radius over M**4.

In one loop, 7-dimensional, or semiclassical approximations,
"effective" action, or the internal space curved up into the
7-sphere by fine tuning a "bare" [10] cosmological constant
in the gravitational part of "S", yielding the addition of a
quantum piece, or Gamma(q)= (1/2)log det S_2b - log det S_2f.

The "kinetic term" for the pilot wave r(it) is viewed as the
field on spacetime, and r_0 is the spacetime-independent
equilibrium radius of S**N:

http://server6.theimagehosting.com/i...mg=formula.JPG

where

Subtracting [8] from [7], and isolating alpha_1:

[9] alpha_1 = [(e**it) - (e**-it)]/2(it), similarly,

[10] alpha_0 = [(e**it) + (e**-it)]/2

Using Euler's formula:

e**(i*Beta*x) = cos(Beta*x) + i*sin(Beta*x), so that

[11]

(e**it + e**-it)/2(it)=[cos(t)+isin(t)-(cos(t)-isin(t))]/2it

= sin(t)/t, and,

[12]

(e**it + e**-it)/2 =[cos(t)+isin(t)+(cos(t)-isin(t))]/2

= cos(t), thus we have:

[13]

alpha_0 = cos(t), and alpha_1 = (sin(t))/t

If we substitute [11] and [12] into [3A], we have e**At =

|cos(t) sin(t)|
|-sin(t) cos(t)|,

or, the rotation matrix, R, which also describes the effect
of rotating the basis of a vector space. This matrix exists
AS AN ADJOINT to the Lorentz matrix, which means that both
the rotation matrix and the Lorentz matrix, L, are ORTHOGONAL
in their transformations. However, only R is unitary. What
this means is that R must have eigenvalues whose modulus
is unity and eigenvectors that are orthogonal to each other.
The difficulties with recognizing a unitary characteristic
of L come from the consequences of the orthogonality of L
from the form of the inner product (with unsymmetric complex
conjugation). UNSYMMETRIC COMPLEX CONJUGATION WITH
POSITIVE DEFINITENESS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT UNITARY
CHARACTERISTIC OF THE LORENTZ MATRIX. THE UNSYMMETRY
ARISES ITSELF FROM THE UNSYMMETRIC NATURE OF COMPLEX
ORTHOGONALITY, HOWEVER THE PSEUDO INNER-PRODUCT
SPACES THAT ARE FRACTAL IN NATURE WHEN NULL VECTOR
OR HARMONIC GENERATOR, for 't' not equal to zero for
which [t,t] = 0. (The zero time we've been talking about!)
The harmonic elucidator becomes identified as the TRANSPOSE
OPERATOR, A, for [t,A(t_0)] = [A_bar(t), t_0) FOR ALL
t and t_0. This is what we mean when the EIGENVECTORS
of a symmetric matrix belonging to DISTINCT EIGENVALUES
being PSEUDO-ORTHOGONAL - THE EIGENVECTORS POPULATE
THE 4-SPACES OF THEIR EIGENVALUED FRACTAL BASINS
HARMONICALLY OR SUB-HARMONICALLY; and we can represent
the above self-adjoint operator, A, in Hilbert Space, H,
as follows:

[14] E(t_0)E(t) = E(t_bar); t_bar = min(t_0,t)

[15] lim(as t - infinity) E(t) = 0 (zero time!)

[16] lim(as t - infinity) E(t) = I (property of being unitary!)

[17] I = (the integral of) -+infinity (dE(t))

[18] A = (the integral of) -+infinity t(dE(t))

The level of projection for each point of resonance forms
the basis for developing a correctly tuned, phase conjugated,
orthogonally rotated, and inverted spin wave that subsumes all
waveforms within the 4-space that are stably less in magnitude
than the magnitude(s) represented by the borders of fractal
basins; The basins exist between zeros on the Riemann horizon
of primes. What about the inverted spin wave? (There was
previous mention of it in the "Dangerous Liberty of Engineering
vs. Lukewarm Dominionism" post:

Spins with angular momentum equal to one possess an electric
quadrupole moment and thus interact with electric-field grad-
ients. A noncubic crystalline lattice structure, imperfections,
or impurities in a cubic lattice give rise to such electric-
field gradients at spin sites. This quadrupole interaction,
in addition to the dipole-dipole interaction, is considered
as being circularly polarized, that is, the vector that rep-
resents the wave has a constant magnitude and rotates contin-
uously about a point.

The relationship between phase angle and direction of the nuta-
tion axis (about which the pole spins precess) determines the
magnitude of magnetic resonance induced for each field coil.
What type of electromagnetic field is used to establish the RF
phase field? In order to get a negative "nutation axis phase
shift" phi, one must use a positive electronic phase shift, psi,
so that psi leads phi by almost 90 degrees. This would also
lead to a state of partial resonance for the pulsing coils.
The pulsing coils employ an unusual design for pulsing elec-
tromagnetic waves. Each field oscillator represents a cell area
"h" in phase space, with the value of h being measured in erg-
seconds. Both the erg vector, or energy vector, and seconds
vector, or time vector, are at right angles to each other, hence
the "area" h. Each cell area h in phase space has four fermion
spin components of gravitating negative zero point energy
[3 spin polarization oscillators + 1 oscillator(from theory)]
and four boson spin components [3 spin polarization oscillators
+ 1 oscillator(from theory)] of anti-gravitating zero point
energy, hence by suppressing the fermion spin components, one
is actually magnifying the bosonic ones. Only the bosonic wave
interaction is stretched by applying bosonic theory. The phase
space path for the bosonic oscillators is measured by an equation
that shares the treatment of spherical harmonics and monopole
harmonics. Spherical harmonics are used as a representation of
the case where the four fermion spin components of gravitating
negative zero point energy [3 spin polarization oscillators +
1 oscillator(from theory)] mentioned above, cancel each other
out (in terms of the gauge factors). However, the bosonic ones
do not: this is a result of the Hopf mapping that occurs between
the two portals. During Hopf mapping, a charge conjugate trans-
formation takes place between poles, with 3 of the spin oscil-
lators represented by R', R**-1, and Q**-1, and the successive
fourth oscillator comes from the AREA of the geodesic triangle
INSIDE ONE OF THE 21,600 SECTORS [9] formed by the 3 spin oscil-
lators R', R**-1, and Q**-1. This is the remaining oscillator
(from theory) of anti-gravitating zero point energy.

Microscopically speaking (in terms of the type of Bismuth Fiber
used in the conducting medium) there is a non-linear phase shift
as a function of input power, which affects the bandwidth of de-
compression. The non-linearity is measured in (watt**-1)(km**-1),
for specific values of polarized radii. Each radii used in the
pulse sequence has a specific energy level attached to it that di-
rectly influences the amount of phase shift, or Delta(phi), which
is equal to g x L_eff*2(P_in), where (Delta)(phi) = phase shift,
g = effective fiber nonlinearity at a given wavelength = (2pi/L)
x (n_2 / A_eff) , where A_eff is the effective mode area, n_2 is
the nonlinear refractive index, and L is the wavelength). Each
fibre crossection is capable of handling 300 mW, so that an entire
fibre array of 1000 x 1000 fibres, with uniform intensity not ex-
ceeding 100 mW per mm2, could theoretically handle
(100)(3)((1000)(1000) = 300,000,000 watts! Thus the phase shift
for a larger array would still be the same for uniform intensity.

Although an exact susceptibility cannot be ascertained at dis-
crete points in time because of relativistic effects of the
decompressing g-field, a spin-correlation function can be used
to calculate the moments of the absorptive parts thru plasma-
degeneration. The circularly polarized magnetic field can
be written as:

h_(+,-)(t) = [h((-x) cos (w_0,t)] +- [(-y) sin w_0(t))]

This expression requires the rotation operator, (-J_z) of the
resonance frequency w_0 = (gamma)*(H_0), where (gamma) comes
from defining the rotation operator (J_gamma)**(alpha)(beta) =
i*(epsilon)**[(alpha)(gamma)(beta)], where alpha, beta (given
above in [9,10,11]) and (epsilon)**[(alpha)(gamma)(beta)] is
the antisymmetric (orthogonal) pseudo-tensor of rank three with
(epsilon)**[(x)(y)(z)] = +1. The mechanical representation of
the off-to-resonant frequency that utilizes the counterrota-
ting disk/tube arrangement is programmed to rotate at 0.9w_r
initially in order to move the entire assembly in and out of
the Larmor bandwidth of atomic resonance, so that the fringe-
field associated with the scalar wave technology can phase
conjugate pump the "reflection waves" in order to increase
the photon emission, as well as reabsorption, with a result-
ing increase in the mass of the electron auger fringefield
and approximately 3.3% of the subquanta (positronium) being
captured by the electron temporarily, meaning that, for an
incident X-ray period ~10**-19 seconds, there is an overall
pulse chain length of 10**10 wavelengths of 0.711 Angstroms
each, amounting to 7,110,000,000 Angstroms total length, or
71.1 meters of v-plasma fringefield.* For the Larmor frequency,
the value of frequency is proportional to the strength of
the magnetic field and the gyromagnetic ratio. The circular
motion of the charged disk/tube arrangement causes motion of
the auger electron to be perpendicular to the field(s) gen-
erated by the disk/tube, producing orthogonally vortexed
spin fields. The Larmor frequency merges the nuclear magnetic
resonance with disk/tube rotation, while the Raman frequency
merges the shell spectral resonance(s) not only by programming
the timing of the pulse probe, but by programming the counter-
baries with the counterrotating, spiral shaped magnetic
transmitter coils at their rotational frequencies, producing
an "off-resonance decompression" of the g-field shock wave,
hyperspace translation can be realized for both horizontal and
vertical decompressions.

*The 71.1 meters value was used in the "Programming the
Deltronic Arc "R" for Polarization" program (written in
Fortran) 2 posts back.

The scattering amplitude, or f(theta, phi) can be calculated
in terms of a boundary condition:

F(theta, phi) = [[i(R)]/ 2]*[(1+cos(theta))/sin(theta)]*
[J_1(k_i)R*sin(theta)]

where R is the radius of the fringefield and k_i =
2(pi)/lambda, and J_1 is an expansion coefficient. The ex-
pansion coefficients are functions of the complex variable
z, or Bessel function. This represents the scattering of
an opaque object, (i.e., superconducting disk and tube), for
which we have chosen an aperture size that is equal to the
width between counterrotating disk and tube inner/outer
circumferences of rotation, so that the intensity of
diffracted radiation in arbitrary units in terms of a
specific k_i(R) value for maximum intensity @ theta = 0,
where theta is symmetric about the probe beam axis,
independent of phi, and confined to both the horizontal
aperture plane of decompression and aperture cylindrical
field of decompression.

American

The aforementioned theory has no reference with current
propulsion technology espoused by NASA, no reference with
any current transportation technology espoused by any
Bureau of Transportation, Interstate, or International
Trade Agreement, no relationship whatsoever with any of
the branches of military or international militaries; no
affiliation with any political party other than the party
of a New Constitution with Sovereignity; no religious
affiliation with any religious organization or group that
has been recognized by any state or nation of states that
grant license to practice religion; and no affiliation
with any name or professional title of industry indicated
or implied herein.

American wrote:
The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud.

Etc.

It would be nice to have an executive summary, so that one could judge
whether the rest is likely to be worth reading, or is just the ravings
of a nut case.

Sylvia.

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
...
American wrote:
The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud.

Etc.

It would be nice to have an executive summary, so that one could judge
whether the rest is likely to be worth reading, or is just the ravings
of a nut case.

It would appear to be a fine word salad, but nothing
following for the main course.

On Aug 30, 10:08 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
American wrote:
The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud.

Etc.

It would be nice to have an executive summary, so that one could judge
whether the rest is likely to be worth reading, or is just the ravings
of a nut case.

Sylvia.

I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.

A

American wrote:
On Aug 30, 10:08 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
American wrote:
The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud.
Etc.

It would be nice to have an executive summary, so that one could judge
whether the rest is likely to be worth reading, or is just the ravings
of a nut case.

Sylvia.

I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.

A


Didn't Gödel have something of relevance to say in relation to that?

Sylvia.

On Sep 1, 7:58 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
American wrote:
On Aug 30, 10:08 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
American wrote:
The directivity of an electron "cloud" is an example of
"polarization", with the difference that a "positronic" cloud
forms opposite to the "electron" cloud.
Etc.

It would be nice to have an executive summary, so that one could judge
whether the rest is likely to be worth reading, or is just the ravings
of a nut case.

Sylvia.

I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.

A

Didn't Gödel have something of relevance to say in relation to that?

Sylvia.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Something like "Every line of thinking must lead to an infinite
regress" would be much better off with every few thousand regresses
inhabiting at least one G2V earth-like planet WITHIN the infinite
cosmos. What Godel said about regressing WAS ITSELF, WITHIN THE DOMAIN
OF INFINITE SET(S).

(Sort of like the unmentionable hypertranslatable parallel universe
theory)

A

Sylvia Else wrote:

American wrote:

I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.

Didn't Gödel have something of relevance to say in relation to that?

I'm more reminded of Wolfgang Pauli's comment: "It is not even wrong."

On Sep 1, 5:50 pm, Alan Anderson wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
American wrote:

I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.

Didn't Gödel have something of relevance to say in relation to that?

I'm more reminded of Wolfgang Pauli's comment: "It is not even wrong."

Don't forget to obscure the original intent of the posting by
redefining
the definition of "it":

"It" is a third-person neuter pronoun, and doesn't seem to hold much
water, i.e., small ideas = small imaginations, so that
time applied = wasted comment.

The migration of electrons to and from an atom (as in solution,
e.g.) makes and negates ions continuously. Thus continually the
external potentials and the nuclear potentials intercommunicate.
This means that their vacuum engines continually diffuse. Any
dimensioning of the external potentials will be passed into the
nuclear potentials as a dimensioning action also. If certain
conditioning vacuum engines are present in the external
potentials, then the slow diffusion into the nuclear
potentials begins to affect the nucleons and their
interactions, the quarks comprising the nucleons, the
particles such as pions continually exchanged between
nucleons, etc.

ref. http://www.intalek.com/Index/Project.../glossary1.pdf

A

On Sep 2, 2:45 am, American wrote:
On Sep 1, 5:50 pm, Alan Anderson wrote:

Sylvia Else wrote:
American wrote:

I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.

Didn't Gödel have something of relevance to say in relation to that?

I'm more reminded of Wolfgang Pauli's comment: "It is not even wrong."

Don't forget to obscure the original intent of the posting by
redefining
the definition of "it":

"It" is a third-person neuter pronoun, and doesn't seem to hold much
water, i.e., small ideas = small imaginations, so that
time applied = wasted comment.

The migration of electrons to and from an atom (as in solution,
e.g.) makes and negates ions continuously. Thus continually the
external potentials and the nuclear potentials intercommunicate.
This means that their vacuum engines continually diffuse. Any
dimensioning of the external potentials will be passed into the
nuclear potentials as a dimensioning action also. If certain
conditioning vacuum engines are present in the external
potentials, then the slow diffusion into the nuclear
potentials begins to affect the nucleons and their
interactions, the quarks comprising the nucleons, the
particles such as pions continually exchanged between
nucleons, etc.

ref.http://www.intalek.com/Index/Project.../glossary1.pdf

A

Can the prolate/oblate nuclei within the BI-IV quadrupole be
stretched by resonance pulsing at the nuclear magneton frequency?
(I'm assuming that the wavelength of the nuclear electric field
produced by protons in the nucleus can be stretched by magne-
tomotive force through the use of resonance positron pulsing
the BI-IV quadrupole with para-positronium, while simultaneously
stretching the electron cloud around the nucleus). Since protons
reside in an atom's nucleus, the resonance sequence decompresses
the g-field of the magnetomotive dipole part of the quadrupole,
forming a miniature event horizon around the circumference of
the electron cloud, which produces Cerenkov radiation. An
analysis of the decompression sequence reveals that in a decom-
pressing or nuclear magnetically pulsed regime, the underlying
shells must decompress before the valence shell adds its lone
proton to the 7p energy level in BI-IV.

The bandwidth of this type of operation would depend upon the
frequencies of the Bi-II 7th shell electrons, which correspond
to the LIIIPIIPIII shell(s) at 0.92413 angstroms at 13.4159 keV.
The inelastic scattering threshold for resonance neutron capture
is 901 keV. Inelastic scattering means that there is no recoil
of the neutron, i.e., the pulse probe is programmable at a
frequency and amplitude that is between the values of neutron
resonance capture (901 keV) and the neutron separation energy
(4604.635 keV). Above inelastic scattering, which is above
901 keV, there is elastic scattering, which involves the
absorption (and emission) of virtual photons as electrons in
order to replace the electrons that become radiated as a
result of the polarized pulse sequencing. In addition to band-
width, there are the ionization potentials for Bismuth, which
includes the wavenumber conversion of 1 eV = 8065.541 cm-1 for
the neutral atom to +6 ions in eV: I=7.2856, II=16.69,
III=25.56, IV=45.3, V=56.0, and VI=88.3. Of course, the BI-II
dipole includes twice the ions, and the BI-IV quadrupole
includes four times the ions. So when there is ionic transfer,
there is also absorption, and consequential emission of virtual
photons taking place for each of the ionic energy levels.

Increasing a mass's "velocity" by using resonant bombardment
through the vacuum flux increases its interaction rate with the
virtual photon flux, causing time dilation (1/f), with accom-
panying stretched wavefront on the local geodyne. (Note: the
"geodyne" represents the decompressed wavefront). The change
of the interaction rate with the virtual photon flux represents
an increase in the masstime (or time dilation), increasing the
overall quadramagnetic synchronicity of the
decompressing g-field.

American