13.2 Billion Years Ago - 5500 Galaxies in a Pinpoint of Sky

Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...telescope.html
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Never be afraid to kick a friend, especially when he's down."

On 10/25/12 2:16 PM, Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...telescope.html
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!



Thank you.

"Called the eXtreme Deep Field, or XDF, the photo was assembled by
combining 10 years of NASA Hubble Space Telescope photographs taken of a
patch of sky at the center of the original Hubble Ultra Deep Field. The
XDF is a small fraction of the angular diameter of the full moon".

On 10/25/2012 3:16 PM, Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...telescope.html
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!



Absolutely horrible resolution in the picture you provided.


Thanks anyway?














--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. �亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg

On 10/25/2012 5:34 PM, HVAC wrote:
On 10/25/2012 3:16 PM, Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...telescope.html

It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!



Absolutely horrible resolution in the picture you provided.


Thanks anyway?



Here.... This is just a bit better. http://goo.gl/8UDya








--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. �亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg

On Oct 25, 12:16*pm, Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...e-space-telesc...
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Never be afraid to kick a friend, especially when he's down."

And it just goes on and on, with no sign of thinning out. Considering
the ever increasing cosmic radius, whereas that lack of thinning out
is truly impressive. Perhaps JWST will go another ten fold better at
detecting distant galaxies within that same FOV.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”

Harlow Campbell "HVAC" wrote:

Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...
http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-universe-view-hubble-space-telescope.html
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

Harlow wrote:
Absolutely horrible resolution in the picture you provided.
Here.... This is just a bit better. http://goo.gl/8UDya

hanson wrote:
Harlow's link when opened actually says:
http://.... The Hubble deep field _SUPERINPOSED_.jpg
Notice the word "SUPERINPOSED" in the link.

Guys, I hate to rain on your parade, but google and
inform yourselves that all such pictures released to the
public are coming from their Photoshop department.

Look at the word "illustration". "Illustration" is NOT what
is there. It is "The act of clarifying or explaining".

Sometimes when it is too obvious they even say
"Artist's conception"... So, enjoy all that beautify with
a "Grain of Salt". Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

On Oct 25, 4:32*pm, "hanson" wrote:
Harlow Campbell *"HVAC" wrote:

Painius wrote:

Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...
http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-universe-view-hubble-space-telesc...
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

Harlow wrote:

Absolutely horrible resolution in the picture you provided.
Here.... This is just a bit better. * *http://goo.gl/8UDya

hanson wrote:

Harlow's link when opened actually says:
http://.... The Hubble deep field _SUPERINPOSED_.jpg
Notice the word *"SUPERINPOSED" in the link.

Guys, I hate to rain on your parade, but google and
inform yourselves that all such pictures released to the
public are coming from their Photoshop department.

Look at the word "illustration". "Illustration" is NOT what
is there. It is "The act of clarifying or explaining".

Sometimes when it is too obvious they even say
"Artist's conception"... So, enjoy all that beautify with
a "Grain of Salt". Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

NASA/Apollo invented PhotoShop, as well as used by our DoD/CIA/
Pentagon in order to identify all of those Muslim WMD, as seen by
aerial and satellite spy images, but upon close inspections as having
vanished or having turned out being perfectly innocent other stuff
that 5th graders would have identified long before starting another
proxy war.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:32:16 -0700, "hanson" wrote:


Harlow Campbell "HVAC" wrote:

Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...
http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-universe-view-hubble-space-telescope.html
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

Harlow wrote:
Absolutely horrible resolution in the picture you provided.
Here.... This is just a bit better. http://goo.gl/8UDya

hanson wrote:
Harlow's link when opened actually says:
http://.... The Hubble deep field _SUPERINPOSED_.jpg
Notice the word "SUPERINPOSED" in the link.

Guys, I hate to rain on your parade, but google and
inform yourselves that all such pictures released to the
public are coming from their Photoshop department.

Look at the word "illustration". "Illustration" is NOT what
is there. It is "The act of clarifying or explaining".

Sometimes when it is too obvious they even say
"Artist's conception"... So, enjoy all that beautify with
a "Grain of Salt". Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

O! Hanson, the happy one! I'm *sure* that Harlow already knew that
his version of the photo was, uhm, "enhanced".

(He's a theoretical astrophysicist, you know.) LMBO !

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Never be afraid to kick a friend, especially when he's down."

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:20:33 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

On Oct 25, 12:16*pm, Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...e-space-telesc...
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

And it just goes on and on, with no sign of thinning out. Considering
the ever increasing cosmic radius, whereas that lack of thinning out
is truly impressive. Perhaps JWST will go another ten fold better at
detecting distant galaxies within that same FOV.

It will be interesting to find out what they're going to do when they
can see the same type of galaxy configuration at 14.7 billion light
years! LOL !

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Never be afraid to kick a friend, especially when he's down."

On Oct 29, 8:55*am, Painius wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:20:33 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth

wrote:
On Oct 25, 12:16 pm, Painius wrote:
Hubble Space Telescope's Extreme Deep Field survey...

http://www.space.com/17755-farthest-...e-space-telesc....
It's the farthest yet we've peered out into space!

And it just goes on and on, with no sign of thinning out. *Considering
the ever increasing cosmic radius, whereas that lack of thinning out
is truly impressive. *Perhaps JWST will go another ten fold better at
detecting distant galaxies within that same FOV.

It will be interesting to find out what they're going to do when they
can see the same type of galaxy configuration at 14.7 billion light
years! *LOL !

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Never be afraid to kick a friend, especially when he's down."

JWST might gather enough IR photons that'll represent 16+ billion ly,
and if that galactic density isn't thinning out is why there's no
telling how vast and much older kind of universe we got ourselves
messed up in.

It seems the ongoing aether flow could be indirectly detected, at
least well enough to suggest from which direction everything has
materialized from.