Hydrogen Production By Photosynthesis

On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and Johnson
Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering fision/fusion
reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the technology to create bombs
instead.

"*" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 3 May 2004 22:28:20 +0200, "Laura" wrote:

snip

Shall we supply the world with energy from the detonation of H-bombs? :-D


Of course, with applied technology. It's been around since 1952!


The H-bomb has been around since then, yes.

Suggest a method of containing an H-bomb blast. Let's say it's a small one -
5 megaton.
In what sort of structure should the blast be contained? Name materials that
could withstand the blast, please.
And, assuming you have an answer to that, how would you extract power from
it in a cost effective manner. These things aren't cheap.
Lastly, what would you suggest be done with the waste from the detonation
devices, which are ordinary A-bombs?

Even if such a powerplant were possible, it would never qualify as safe and
clean.

Stop being silly. Your hydrogen scheme, though also poorly thought out, is
much more realistic than this. This is cartoon-type stuff, for crying out
loud :-)

"*" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and Johnson
Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering fision/fusion
reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the technology to create bombs
instead.


Would you finally get a clue? Please?
At least study the underlying physics a little. If you did, you'd understand
why there are fusion bombs but no fusion reactors.
You could start he http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_9.htm
This is a link that *you* posted as proof that sustainable fusion power is
currently possible. You made a fool of yourself. You only proved that you
hadn't, in fact, read the entire page you posted a link to.
Do yourself a favor and read the whole thing. Yes, even the dry stuff with
the numbers. Take some time out of your busy whistle-blowing schedule and
learn something.

In article ,
wrote:

On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and Johnson
Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering fision/fusion
reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the technology to create bombs
instead.


Of course. And the same technology was to produce the huge pools of
molten steel.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation
Agent, "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet, and Chief AFA-B Vote Rustler.

X-No Archive:Yes
On Tue, 4 May 2004 07:49:18 +0200, "Laura" wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 3 May 2004 22:28:20 +0200, "Laura" wrote:

snip

Shall we supply the world with energy from the detonation of H-bombs? :-D


Of course, with applied technology. It's been around since 1952!


The H-bomb has been around since then, yes.

Suggest a method of containing an H-bomb blast. Let's say it's a small one -
5 megaton.
In what sort of structure should the blast be contained? Name materials that
could withstand the blast, please.
And, assuming you have an answer to that, how would you extract power from
it in a cost effective manner. These things aren't cheap.
Lastly, what would you suggest be done with the waste from the detonation
devices, which are ordinary A-bombs?

Even if such a powerplant were possible, it would never qualify as safe and
clean.

Stop being silly. Your hydrogen scheme, though also poorly thought out, is
much more realistic than this. This is cartoon-type stuff, for crying out
loud :-)

Laura, you're whistling in the wind. The only thing Alexa pays
any attention to are the voices in her head.

Nice try, though.



Widdershins


I prefer the wicked rather than the foolish.
The wicked sometimes rest.

Alexandre Dumas, pere (with thanks to Twitch)

Borrowed from Twitch

Let's find out what Carl R. Osterwald has to contribute...

In article ,
wrote:

On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and
Johnson Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering
fision/fusion reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the
technology to create bombs instead.


Of course. And the same technology was to produce the huge pools of
molten steel.

I'm sure Alexa is gathering information to prove the existence of HUGE
POOLS of 100% PURE MOLTEN ALUMINUM.

--
Robert Buchanan
http://www.robertbuchanan.us

"...live and recorded performance of classical music is stone cold dead."
t
Does ignorant buffoon Bill Cleere have the faintest clue that Mikhail
Pletnev, Zoltán Kocsis, Anne-Sophie Mutter, Claudio Abbado, Itzhak Perlman,
Paul Crossley, Gidon Kremer, Martha Argerich, Kyoko Takezawa, Alexander
Mogilewsky, Alexandre Gurning, Mitsuko Uchida, and so many other
accomplished performers still record and perform music to sold-out shows
and good sales? Does he even know who these reknowned musicians are?

SEE ridiculous snuhboys obsess over me:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...8&oe=ISO-8859-
1&threadm=40957137.7051C792%40hotmail.com&rnum=1&p rev=/groups%3Fsafe%3Dimag
es%26ie%3DISO-8859-1%26oe%3DISO-8859-
1%26as_umsgid%3D%253C40957137.7051C792%40hotmail.c om%253E%26lr%3D%26hl%3Den

"Laura" wrote in message
...

"*" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and Johnson
Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering
fision/fusion
reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the technology to create bombs
instead.


Would you finally get a clue? Please?
At least study the underlying physics a little. If you did, you'd
understand
why there are fusion bombs but no fusion reactors.
You could start he http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_9.htm
This is a link that *you* posted as proof that sustainable fusion power is
currently possible. You made a fool of yourself. You only proved that you
hadn't, in fact, read the entire page you posted a link to.
Do yourself a favor and read the whole thing. Yes, even the dry stuff with
the numbers. Take some time out of your busy whistle-blowing schedule and
learn something.

Al*xa _can't_ admit to error on this. If she did, it might
damage her ko0ky konspiracee theeory wurldview.

Did you hear about the 'Magic Free Energy Welders", yet?

ESL!

--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
We're not laughing _with_ bRay!
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Namer of the 10-gallon Creel
Keeper of the Nickname List
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order

On 04 May 2004 19:37:14 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what Carl R. Osterwald has to contribute...

In article ,
wrote:

On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and
Johnson Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering
fision/fusion reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the
technology to create bombs instead.


Of course. And the same technology was to produce the huge pools of
molten steel.

I'm sure Alexa is gathering information to prove the existence of HUGE
POOLS of 100% PURE MOLTEN ALUMINUM.

Riiiiiiight, you and your sock puppets are prisoners here on the late great
planet earth, nuke it until it glows.

On Tue, 04 May 2004 20:10:43 GMT, "Bookman"
wrote:


"Laura" wrote in message
...

"*" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with Bechtel and Johnson
Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in sequestering
fision/fusion
reactors. Of course, Bechtel Nevada uses the technology to create bombs
instead.


Would you finally get a clue? Please?
At least study the underlying physics a little. If you did, you'd
understand
why there are fusion bombs but no fusion reactors.
You could start he http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_9.htm
This is a link that *you* posted as proof that sustainable fusion power is
currently possible. You made a fool of yourself. You only proved that you
hadn't, in fact, read the entire page you posted a link to.
Do yourself a favor and read the whole thing. Yes, even the dry stuff with
the numbers. Take some time out of your busy whistle-blowing schedule and
learn something.

Al*xa _can't_ admit to error on this. If she did, it might
damage her ko0ky konspiracee theeory wurldview.

Did you hear about the 'Magic Free Energy Welders", yet?

You're the king of strawmen.

ESL!

* wrote:

On 04 May 2004 19:37:14 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what Carl R. Osterwald has to contribute...

In article ,
wrote:

On Mon, 03 May 2004 14:34:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

Yes, but this solution is being suppressed by
Lockheed/Echelon.

Lockheed owns Echelon.

And the Department of Energy, in conjunction with
Bechtel and Johnson Controls.

All of the above have a HUGE vested interest in
sequestering fision/fusion reactors. Of course, Bechtel
Nevada uses the technology to create bombs instead.


Of course. And the same technology was to produce the
huge pools of molten steel.

I'm sure Alexa is gathering information to prove the
existence of HUGE POOLS of 100% PURE MOLTEN ALUMINUM.

Riiiiiiight, you and your sock puppets are prisoners here
on the late great planet earth, nuke it until it glows.

Have you noticed that your grasp of science-related issues is
way below that of the average middle school kid? If you work
real hard at it, you still have a chance to be the last one to
notice that fact. (By the way, your grasp of science-related
issues isn't necessarily worse than your grasp of any other
issues. It's just the funniest example.) Seriously, Alexia,
you've emitted a lot of smoke and other forms of gas here, but
you haven't shown any understanding of anything. You need to
spend your time sewing, baking cookies, scrubbing floors, etc.