A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA's biggest worry right now: What if something goes wrongwith the Webb telescope?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old February 10th 18, 08:45 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris.B[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,001
Default NASA's biggest worry right now: What if something goes wrongwith the Webb telescope?

On Saturday, 10 February 2018 02:34:20 UTC+1, RichA wrote:
On Friday, 9 February 2018 19:32:52 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:31:13 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Friday, 9 February 2018 09:33:45 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:37:05 -0800 (PST), "Scott M. Kozel"
wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 4:44:37 PM UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:37:37 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

1M miles from Earth. Think Musk's cheesy rockets will be able to ferry people out to its solar orbit point to fix it? No, forget it. Musk's rocket would likely disintegrate upon return to Earth because the re-entry from a "left orbit" attitude is much more difficult and vehicle-stressing than coming down FROM orbit.
So, for the foreseeable future, the Webb must work, or it's an orbiting hulk, a far worse predicament than was faced by Hubble.

It's an engineering tradeoff. Do you use a low orbit to allow
servicing, at the expense of a great deal of utility (as with HST), or
do you put it much higher, where it can do better science, but can't
be serviced?

Of course, there was never a need to service the HST. Entire
replacements could have been launched for less than the cost of the
servicing missions.

And if they used the shuttle to launch the replacement they could have
brought the old one back if they felt that was important.

Yeah, but the shuttle was a boondoggle from day one. Largely
unnecessary, and vastly more expensive than alternatives.

Who cared if it cost more? Nothing they have now (well, they really don't have anything, hence the Russian ferry service) is remotely as flexible.


We don't appear to have much need for the things the Shuttle was
capable of. It was designed to build the ISS, which is something else
we never really needed, and which sucked money out of the most
important things NASA does: monitoring the Earth, operating space
telescopes, and conducting robotic investigations of other bodies in
the Solar System.


Don't agree about the Shuttle, agree about ISS, it's a travesty.


If there wasn't a space station you'd have to invent one.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA's Webb Telescope to Have a Texas-Sized Presence at the South by Southwest Festival [email protected] Misc 0 December 6th 17 10:50 PM
Congress to Keep Funding NASA's Webb Telescope Sam Wormley[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 14 November 19th 11 02:23 AM
NASA'S Webb Telescope Completes Mirror Coating Milestone Doug Freyburger Policy 9 September 18th 11 01:39 AM
NASA Chief to Congress: Save the James Webb Space Telescope Sam Wormley[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 21 July 15th 11 08:48 PM
NASA Issues Modification to James Webb Space Telescope Contract Ron Baalke Misc 0 September 3rd 03 11:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.