|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
Truth (light accelerates in a gravitational field like cannonballs):
http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristi...t-lens_PPT.pdf Dr. Cristian Bahrim: "If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies." Camouflage (it is true but irrelevant that the speed of light "stays the same as measured by someone falling into the well and watching it pass by"): http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1635.html Question: "When a photon falls in a gravitational well, does its speed exceed 'c'?" Dr. Sten Odenwald: "No. The frequency of the light just increases or decreases depending on where you are located. The 'local' speed stays the same as measured by someone falling into the well and watching it pass by. This is the only observer who is in what relativity would consider a 'proper rest frame'." Blatant lie (light falls but does not accelerate in a gravitational field): http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-S.../dp/0306817586 Why Does E=mc2?: (And Why Should We Care?), Brian Cox, Jeff Forshaw, p. 236: "If the light falls in strict accord with the principle of equivalence, then, as it falls, its energy should increase by exactly the same fraction that it increases for any other thing we could imagine dropping. We need to know what happens to the light as it gains energy. In other words, what can Pound and Rebka expect to see at the bottom of their laboratory when the dropped light arrives? There is only one way for the light to increase its energy. We know that it cannot speed up, because it is already traveling at the universal speed limit, but it can increase its frequency." Of all the Einsteinians all over the world not one could think of a reason why truth, lie and camouflage should not be taught simultaneously. Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
The top of a tower of height h emits light towards an observer on the
ground. In a unit time, the number of wavecrests which reach the observer are those in a distance: c' = Lf' = Lf(1+gh/c^2) = c(1+gh/c^2) where c' is the final speed of the light (relative to the observer), L is the wavelength, f' is the frequency as measured by the observer, f is the frequency as measured by the source and c is the initial speed of the light (relative to the source). The equation f'=f(1+gh/c^2) has been confirmed by the Pound-Rebka experiment. The speed of light varies with the gravitational potential in accordance with Newton's emission theory of light. Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
Einstein shows how the speed of light varies with the gravitational
potential: http://www.relativitybook.com/resour...n_gravity.html Albert Einstein: "If we call the velocity of light at the origin of co- ordinates c0, then the velocity of light c at a place with the gravitation potential phi will be given by the relation c=c0(1+phi/ c^2)." Einsteiniana's zombies sing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity". This is "perfectly valid and makes good physical sense", explains Steve Carlip, "but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity": http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._of_light.html Steve Carlip: "Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: "...according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [...] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position." Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity suggests that he did mean so. This interpretation is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense, but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity." Einsteiniana's zombies know nothing more consistent than Steve Carlip's explanation. The ecstasy gets uncontrollable - zombies tumble to the floor, start tearing their clothes and go into convulsions. Pentcho Valev |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
On Jan 29, 4:18*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Einstein shows how the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential: http://www.relativitybook.com/resour...n_gravity.html Albert Einstein: "If we call the velocity of light at the origin of co- ordinates c0, then the velocity of light c at a place with the gravitation potential phi will be given by the relation c=c0(1+phi/ c^2)." Einsteiniana's zombies sing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity". This is "perfectly valid and makes good physical sense", explains Steve Carlip, "but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity": http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...fLight/speed_o... Steve Carlip: "Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: "...according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [...] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position." Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity suggests that he did mean so. This interpretation is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense, but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity." Einsteiniana's zombies know nothing more consistent than Steve Carlip's explanation. The ecstasy gets uncontrollable - zombies tumble to the floor, start tearing their clothes and go into convulsions. Pentcho Valev Idiot |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
Anonymous Einsteinians enthusiastically prove that, in a gravitational
field, the speed of light varies exactly as the speed of cannonballs does, in accordance with Newton's emission theory of light: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixhczNygcWo "Relativity 3 - gravity and light" Pentcho Valev |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
If the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential exactly
as the speed of cannonballs does, could that effect be the cause of the gravitational redshift? Of Halton Arp's "intrinsic redshift"? Einsteinians? Einsteinians ready to reply: http://game2gether.de/wordpress/wp-c...4-1024x819.jpg Pentcho Valev wrote: Anonymous Einsteinians enthusiastically prove that, in a gravitational field, the speed of light varies exactly as the speed of cannonballs does, in accordance with Newton's emission theory of light: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixhczNygcWo "Relativity 3 - gravity and light" Pentcho Valev |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ANYTHING GOES
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message ... If the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential exactly as the speed of cannonballs does, It doesn't. You should learn some physics. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EINSTEINIANA WITHOUT BIG BANG | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 17th 10 11:56 AM |
MADNESS IN EINSTEINIANA | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 17 | March 13th 10 03:11 AM |
CONFLICTS IN EINSTEINIANA | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 31st 09 07:35 AM |
DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 15 | August 19th 09 10:01 AM |
EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | December 27th 07 09:27 PM |