A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Arming Outer Space



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old November 21st 03, 05:01 PM
Steve Dufour
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Arming Outer Space

.. A single reasonably hardened orbital platform with
an energy weapon or even just overgrown lawn darts could render every
surface naval vessel obsolete and vulnerable.


How do you "reasonably harden" a space craft? You can not hide it.
Couldn't it be shot down by an energy weapon on earth, which could be
hidden until fired?
  #4  
Old November 23rd 03, 03:08 PM
Steve Dufour
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Arming Outer Space

. A single reasonably hardened orbital platform with
an energy weapon or even just overgrown lawn darts could render every
surface naval vessel obsolete and vulnerable.


It's baloney anyway, because
1. You'd need an extensive network of satellites, due to the facts of
orbital motion.
2. Existing Aegis ships already have the radar capability to track and
shoot down stuff that's way up--enough that the changes required for
THAD (Theatre Area Defense, the Navy's anti-ballistic component) will
require little more than a software upgrade. Not to mention anything
as big as a ship pretty much laughs off an energy weapon.
3. It takes a lot of missile to sink a modern ship. You'd be likelier
to succeed with a ballistic torpedo--but that gets you into some hefty
reentry requirements.


How do you "reasonably harden" a space craft? You can not hide it.


Sure you can. NRO does it all the time. Build of stealth materials,
change orbital positions frequently.


Cool. I didn't know that. But once if fires its weapon it will no
longer he hidden, seems to me anyway.


Couldn't it be shot down by an energy weapon on earth, which could be
hidden until fired?


Tom Merkle

  #5  
Old November 23rd 03, 04:33 PM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Arming Outer Space

In article ,
Steve Dufour wrote:
Sure you can. NRO does it all the time. Build of stealth materials,
change orbital positions frequently.


Cool. I didn't know that. But once if fires its weapon it will no
longer he hidden, seems to me anyway.


A common problem with stealth systems. (In particular, a notorious
problem for submarines -- they are very hard to find until they actually
*do* something, at which time their location is momentarily obvious.)
--
MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer
pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Space Shuttle 150 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
European high technology for the International Space Station Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 May 10th 04 02:40 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) Rand Simberg Space Science Misc 18 February 14th 04 03:28 AM
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 December 27th 03 01:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.