|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong?
On Jan 30, 7:38 pm, extreme crank shuba wrote:
Time dilation results from comparing elapsed coordinate time and elapsed proper time. Referencing the following equation where there is one observer and on observed, ** dTau^2 = u_00 dt^2 – SUM(SUM(u_ij g_ij dq^i dq^j)) / c^2 Where ** i = 1 to 3, j = 1 to 3 ** t, q^1, q^2, q^3 = Observer’s coordinate system ** Tau = Local time at the observed ** SUM(SUM(g_ij dq^i dq^j)) = Segment of flat space as observed by the observer ** u_00 = Time flow rate scale factor of the observed relative to the observer ** SUM(SUM(u_ij g_ij dq^i dq^j)) = Local curved space at the observed if using the observer’s coordinate system to describe it Thus, your definition of the proper time is only the time flow at the observed, and your coordinate time is the observer’s own rate of time flow. For instance, if u_00 1, the local time flow rate at the observed is slower than the one observing it. If you don’t agree, where do you not agree? shrug If you had the slightest idea how to apply "simple maths" to simple physics, you wouldn't have to wonder. Let’s see if timid shuba does. shrug The mathematics and physics are analogous to rotations in a plane. Imagine a stick along the x-axis, project its length onto an arbitrary x'-axis given by a rotation from the x-axis, and compare the projected length with the original length. Then write relevant equations in standard trigonometric form, including the y and y' axes and the rotation angle. This issue is not about projection of rulers. According to the mathematics, it is about comparing in a relative sense of different time flow rate. shrug [rest of gross ignorance snipped] Timid shuba needs to learn better physics instead of relying on occult. Here is another score for the Orwellian concept of relativity. shrug ** FAITH IS LOGIC ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** FICTION IS THEORY ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY ** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong? | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 31st 12 06:10 PM |
How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong? | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 31st 12 12:03 PM |
How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong? | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 10 | January 31st 12 07:35 AM |
How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | January 26th 12 12:42 AM |