|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS
http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/275065
"These "cosmic bullets" are the highest energy particles in the universe, packing wallops 100 time higher than anything produced in the most powerful atom smasher on Earth. Scientists have long been tantalized by glimpses of this rare variety of cosmic rays and conflicting explanations for their existence abounded, even challenging Einstein's theory of special relativity." How can these "cosmic bullets" challenge Einstein's theory of special relativity? Has their "highest energy" anything to do with their speed? http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/275065 "Another positive part of the story is that special relativity has survived its most severe test," Smolin said. Frenchmen would say: "Oh la la oh la la oh oh!". How "cosmic bullets" challenged Einstein's special relativity and how Einstein's special relativity survived in the end will probably remain a secret. At least nobody in Einstein zombie world would ever ask Einsteinians to explain. Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS
On Nov 10, 5:28 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
How can these "cosmic bullets" challenge Einstein's theory of special relativity? Has their "highest energy" anything to do with their speed? It's a new story written by a reporter. You can't read anything more to it than what's on the surface. If you're curious about the details then find the research papers describing those explanations. That way you can work out for yourself what they're on about. Frenchmen would say: "Oh la la oh la la oh oh!". How "cosmic bullets" challenged Einstein's special relativity and how Einstein's special relativity survived in the end will probably remain a secret. At least nobody in Einstein zombie world would ever ask Einsteinians to explain. So go visit zombie-land and find the answer. You don't have to rely on other people to carry you through - the entire world it written down on paper, read it yourself. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS
On Nov 9, 6:28 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/275065 "These "cosmic bullets" are the highest energy particles in the universe, packing wallops 100 time higher than anything produced in the most powerful atom smasher on Earth. Scientists have long been tantalized by glimpses of this rare variety of cosmic rays and conflicting explanations for their existence abounded, even challenging Einstein's theory of special relativity." How can these "cosmic bullets" challenge Einstein's theory of special relativity? Has their "highest energy" anything to do with their speed? http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/275065 "Another positive part of the story is that special relativity has survived its most severe test," Smolin said. Frenchmen would say: "Oh la la oh la la oh oh!". How "cosmic bullets" challenged Einstein's special relativity and how Einstein's special relativity survived in the end will probably remain a secret. At least nobody in Einstein zombie world would ever ask Einsteinians to explain. Unlike Frenchmen, Anglophones say "Uh oh Einstein" in such cases. But some mystery always remains so that, if Einstein's false light postulate is to be attacked, this could only be done by Lee Smolin in the Perimeter Institute. Only Lee Smolin in the Perimeter Institute knows how Einstein criminal cult can extract money from attacks against Einstein's false light postulate: http://www.universetoday.com/2007/10...peed-of-light/ "The speed of light is the speed of light, and that's that. Right? Well, maybe not. Try and figure this out. Astronomers studying radiation coming from a distant galaxy found that the high energy gamma rays arrived a few minutes after the lower-energy photons, even though they were emitted at the same time. If true, this result would overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that all photons should move at the speed of light. Uh oh Einstein." http://edge.org/3rd_culture/smolin03...n03_index.html Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin, and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is observed? The most severe possibility is that the principle of relativity simply fails....But there is another possibility. This is that the principle of relativity is preserved, but Einstein's special theory of relativity requires modification so as to allow photons to have a speed that depends on energy. The most shocking thing I have learned in the last year is that this is a real possibility. A photon can have an energy-dependent speed without violating the principle of relativity!" Pentcho Valev |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS
Pentcho Valev
Frenchmen would say: "Oh la la oh la la oh oh!". How "cosmic bullets" challenged Einstein's special relativity and how Einstein's special relativity survived in the end will probably remain a secret. At least nobody in Einstein zombie world would ever ask Einsteinians to explain. Unlike Frenchmen, Anglophones say "Uh oh Einstein" in such cases. But some mystery always remains so that, if Einstein's false light postulate is to be attacked, this could only be done by Lee Smolin in the Perimeter Institute. Only Lee Smolin in the Perimeter Institute knows how Einstein criminal cult can extract money from attacks against Einstein's false light postulate: For what it's worth, I'm a frenchman and I say : cut the bull****. And I guess french scientists say "Oh, oh, Einstein" too. Phil l'ancien- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SHOULD EINSTEINIANS BE BROUGHT TO COURT? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 14 | November 7th 07 04:36 PM |
EINSTEINIANS AS IMPERFECT MAGICIANS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | September 2nd 07 01:03 PM |
how does Mohammar stem so still, whenever Zakariya intends the distinct consent very deliberately | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 14th 07 12:22 PM |
HOW EINSTEINIANS UNDERSTAND SCIENCE | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 12th 07 06:36 PM |
NON-EINSTEINIANS AND ANTI-RELATIVISTS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 12th 07 03:09 PM |