![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm about to leave town and only had time to process it in black and
white before I go. This guy is evolving FAST. His image is about 4 hours after my previous one. I went to 1x1 binning and 2" exposures hoping for more detail. Note the nucleus is off center one way but the ring around it is off center the other way. This is weird to say the least. 10x2" at 0.5" per pixel Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see when I converted to JPEG most of the faint stuff outer coma got
lost in the compression routine. I should have looked at it before sending it. I enhanced the fainter part so it now survives the JPEG routine to look the same intensity as the TIFF does unenhanced. Never saw that before. The original post was a linear stretch of the data, no histogram alterations to better show the visual appearance. Rick Rick Johnson wrote: I'm about to leave town and only had time to process it in black and white before I go. This guy is evolving FAST. His image is about 4 hours after my previous one. I went to 1x1 binning and 2" exposures hoping for more detail. Note the nucleus is off center one way but the ring around it is off center the other way. This is weird to say the least. 10x2" at 0.5" per pixel Rick ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick Johnson" schreef in bericht
... I see when I converted to JPEG most of the faint stuff outer coma got lost in the compression routine. I should have looked at it before sending it. I enhanced the fainter part so it now survives the JPEG routine to look the same intensity as the TIFF does unenhanced. Never saw that before. The original post was a linear stretch of the data, no histogram alterations to better show the visual appearance. Rick that's is an good image of a very interesting object! I hope the clouds clear soon in the netherlands, so I can try to image it as well! -- Martijn www.xs4all.nl/~martlian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it did come out nice rick
have a good trip "Rick Johnson" wrote in message ... I'm about to leave town and only had time to process it in black and white before I go. This guy is evolving FAST. His image is about 4 hours after my previous one. I went to 1x1 binning and 2" exposures hoping for more detail. Note the nucleus is off center one way but the ring around it is off center the other way. This is weird to say the least. 10x2" at 0.5" per pixel Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick Johnson" wrote
... ..... This guy is evolving FAST...... It sure is Rick!! I could notice a difference (larger, brighter) in just 3 hours last night while observing with my 20x80's. This Comet may result in more images in a.b.p.a than Hale-Bopp did!! ![]() George N |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: Comet Holmes | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 2 | October 28th 07 09:23 AM |
Comet Holmes - File 1 of 1 - Holmes.jpg (1/1) | Skywise | Astro Pictures | 3 | October 26th 07 05:25 AM |
Comet Holmes | Skywise | Astro Pictures | 1 | October 25th 07 07:34 AM |
Comet Holmes | Skywise | Astro Pictures | 0 | October 25th 07 07:31 AM |
ASTRO: Stokes Parameter Polarization Difference Image os Comet 17 / P Holmes | Richard Crisp[_1_] | Astro Pictures | 0 | October 25th 07 07:07 AM |