|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On 30/08/2011 20:32, Ben wrote:
Sour grapes anyone? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ja...-change-shock/ No comment..... It isn't a good idea to rely on the Telegraph for any science news. They have repeatedly employed morons in that post. Would you ever trust someone who claimed to be "right about everything" or would you have them sectioned as a delusional nutter? Regards, Martin Brown |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On Aug 30, 9:32*pm, Ben wrote:
Sour grapes anyone?http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ja...2296/sun-cause... No comment..... Remember what I showed you - http://news.bbc.co.uk/weather/forecast/3720? The massive temperature fluctuations reflect 1461 rotations in 1461 days,of course I would like to discuss the astronomical inputs which distinguish hemispherical weather patterns from global climate by introducing a new orbital component however astronomers are in short supply. When astronomers can interpret the two separate 360 degree cycles with respect to the central Sun in the following time lapse footage,then and only then can people begin to consider climate and temperature fluctuations in any meaningful way and eventually people will start earning their doctorates and start giving humanity something exciting to look at for a change - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ As the community here insists on 1465 rotations in 1461 days,you can rest assured that the wider community has little grasp of the major inputs so let these doctorates run up and down their halls and work out exactly how they wish to proceed insofar as this is extremely important but only as important as people wish to consider themselves. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
Some folks have profited enormously since the term was first invented by Al
G*** some years ago. Whenever big business is involed, the common man loses out. It does not surprise me that the sun may be causing it. Some scientists have said this for many years before Al and others decided it was a man-made thing. I'm surprised some here aren't blaming the recent, unusual earthquakes and freak NE hurricane on global warming..... give them time. Global warming is nothing more than money in someone elses' pocket other than mine. I won't be bought off by it as so many others have. Look out for "666"! - "Ben" wrote in message ... Sour grapes anyone? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ja...-change-shock/ No comment..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On 8/30/11 2:32 PM, Ben wrote:
Sour grapes anyone? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ja...-change-shock/ No comment..... If you are interested -- Global Climate Change Resources http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Glob...Resources.html In particular you might looks at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...r4_syr_spm.pdf |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
"Martin Brown" wrote in message ... | On 30/08/2011 20:32, Ben wrote: | Sour grapes anyone? | http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ja...-change-shock/ | | No comment..... | | It isn't a good idea to rely on the Telegraph for any science news. They | have repeatedly employed morons in that post. | | Would you ever trust someone who claimed to be "right about everything" | or would you have them sectioned as a delusional nutter? | | Regards, | Martin Brown | Haven't you been sectioned yet, Brown? Funny how anyone that disagrees with your crankosity is delusional nutter while you are not (in your own opinion). Disregards, Androcles |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On Aug 30, 1:32*pm, Ben wrote:
Sour grapes anyone? There was indeed a recent finding from CERN that cosmic rays do have some real effect, but this does not mean we should stop being concerned about the effect of anthropogenic carbon dioxide - which is also real, and which is something we can control. John Savard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On Aug 30, 3:03*pm, Quadibloc wrote:
On Aug 30, 1:32*pm, Ben wrote: Sour grapes anyone? There was indeed a recent finding from CERN that cosmic rays do have some real effect, but this does not mean we should stop being concerned about the effect of anthropogenic carbon dioxide - which is also real, and which is something we can control. John Savard We can also control how much helium we artificially vent, along with a number of other artificially vented gasses, including the accelerated evaporation of hydrocarbons plus the consumption/conversion of h2o which has to cycle as increased nighttime cloud cover to go along with our CO2 and NOx acidic rain that's pretty much good for nothing organic or biologically striving to evolve and thus survive in spite of us humans. Our artificial global dimming is also a measurable factor that's causing our planet to heat up, not to mention all the direct heat from our hydrocarbon fires and of course all of those nifty rockets are not exactly spewing ice. Perhaps "Ben" also doesn't know that land and sea which used to be fully snow/ice covered and thus reflective, that's becoming increasingly bare, dark and solar energy absorbing isn't exactly helping either. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On Aug 30, 6:17*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Aug 30, 3:03*pm, Quadibloc wrote: On Aug 30, 1:32*pm, Ben wrote: Sour grapes anyone? There was indeed a recent finding from CERN that cosmic rays do have some real effect, but this does not mean we should stop being concerned about the effect of anthropogenic carbon dioxide - which is also real, and which is something we can control. John Savard We can also control how much helium we artificially vent, along with a number of other artificially vented gasses, including the accelerated evaporation of hydrocarbons plus the consumption/conversion of h2o which has to cycle as increased nighttime cloud cover to go along with our CO2 and NOx acidic rain that's pretty much good for nothing organic or biologically striving to evolve and thus survive in spite of us humans. Our artificial global dimming is also a measurable factor that's causing our planet to heat up, not to mention all the direct heat from our hydrocarbon fires and of course all of those nifty rockets are not exactly spewing ice. Perhaps "Ben" also doesn't know that land and sea which used to be fully snow/ice covered and thus reflective, that's becoming increasingly bare, dark and solar energy absorbing isn't exactly helping either. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” No comment |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming anyone?
On Aug 30, 8:13*pm, Ben wrote:
On Aug 30, 6:17*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Aug 30, 3:03*pm, Quadibloc wrote: On Aug 30, 1:32*pm, Ben wrote: Sour grapes anyone? There was indeed a recent finding from CERN that cosmic rays do have some real effect, but this does not mean we should stop being concerned about the effect of anthropogenic carbon dioxide - which is also real, and which is something we can control. John Savard We can also control how much helium we artificially vent, along with a number of other artificially vented gasses, including the accelerated evaporation of hydrocarbons plus the consumption/conversion of h2o which has to cycle as increased nighttime cloud cover to go along with our CO2 and NOx acidic rain that's pretty much good for nothing organic or biologically striving to evolve and thus survive in spite of us humans. Our artificial global dimming is also a measurable factor that's causing our planet to heat up, not to mention all the direct heat from our hydrocarbon fires and of course all of those nifty rockets are not exactly spewing ice. Perhaps "Ben" also doesn't know that land and sea which used to be fully snow/ice covered and thus reflective, that's becoming increasingly bare, dark and solar energy absorbing isn't exactly helping either. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” No comment That's not playing fair. Tell us how 7 billion humans exploiting and wasting most everything in sight, as well as leaking, spilling, venting, evaporating and simply forcing a multitude of natural and unnatural chemicals plus radiating and dumping mostly dirty energy into the surface, oceans and atmospheric environments is not a measurable factor. The OCO mission would have quantified a number of those elements, but of course you're just glade that Big Energy foiled that one. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What could be the cause of global warming? | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 11th 07 08:23 PM |
dinosaur extinction/global cooling &human extinction/global warming | 281979 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 17th 06 12:05 PM |
Solar warming v. Global warming | Roger Steer | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
Global warming v. Solar warming | Roger Steer | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 18th 05 10:58 AM |
global warming: is it us, or is it the sun? | jjustwwondering | Policy | 146 | August 10th 04 05:04 PM |