A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What if (on Darla)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 5th 09, 11:30 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Darla[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 165
Default What if (on Darla)


On Oct 26, 6:47 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Last post from Darla was at the time the earth had the "chicken flu"
spreading. Could be the Seans came down with it real bad. They fled the
Earth to save their lives,but in reality it was to late,and their space
ship is a space coffin. Computers keep the ship alive,but its passengers
are all dead. We must not forget the Seans had no Earth imunity. Even
us Earthlings have problems overcoming Earth cultivated viruses Hope
I am dead wrong Bert


Sorry dear Bert that I missed this post of yours.
Seans are naturally immune to all the dangerous viruses and bacteria.
Thank you so very much for your concern for us!

--
**** Darla of news:sci.electromagnetics
Be well and come, be welcome.
You are the fifth star!


  #2  
Old December 5th 09, 02:19 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (on Darla)

Darla Glad I was just talking fiction. Glad your great ship was not
"lost in space" In my novel "Stepping Stones" I had a chapter where in
their search for Earth they came upon a ship that was running on
silicone life. Was going to answer on "fusion" To add it takes great
heat and pressure to create a nuclear reaction in which the nuclei of
atoms combine to produce great energy. Compression force of gravity
makes stars. v Both fusion and fission give nuclear energy. Fission uses
heavy atoms"uranium" Fusion uses the lightest atom hydrogen.(two forms)
Mother nature uses fusion to make stars Humankind makes thermonuclear
weapons(bombs) I have invented a "Pulse fusion machine" to give humans
long lasting free energy. It would take 6 billion bucks to build. I
warned Columbia U that the Tokamak would melt down in seconds when they
bought it from Russia. My fusion machine I guarantee would work for 75
years or more. I would swap my invention just to know the source of
gravity.Go figure Bert your gravity thinking man always

  #3  
Old December 6th 09, 08:26 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Darla[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 165
Default What if (on Darla)


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Darla Glad I was just talking fiction. Glad your great ship was not
"lost in space" In my novel "Stepping Stones" I had a chapter where in
their search for Earth they came upon a ship that was running on
silicone life. Was going to answer on "fusion" To add it takes great
heat and pressure to create a nuclear reaction in which the nuclei of
atoms combine to produce great energy. Compression force of gravity
makes stars. v Both fusion and fission give nuclear energy. Fission uses
heavy atoms"uranium" Fusion uses the lightest atom hydrogen.(two forms)
Mother nature uses fusion to make stars Humankind makes thermonuclear
weapons(bombs) I have invented a "Pulse fusion machine" to give humans
long lasting free energy. It would take 6 billion bucks to build. I
warned Columbia U that the Tokamak would melt down in seconds when they
bought it from Russia. My fusion machine I guarantee would work for 75
years or more. I would swap my invention just to know the source of
gravity.Go figure Bert your gravity thinking man always


And are you absolutely certain that your fusion machine wouldn't produce
black holes? G

Now, let's see, you want to swap your invention for the source of gravity.
If I made you this swap, then I would have to pay someone 6 billion bucks to
build it.
Hmm.
But you already know the Source of gravity.
What you really want to know is HOW the source of gravity, matter, produces
the gravitational effect, no?
The secret of knowing is in the changes.
Energy does not produce a gravitational effect until it changes into matter.
Now, energy and matter are sort of like water and ice, aren't they?
Two forms of the same thing?
So ask yourself, "How does energy, when its form changes into matter, all of
a sudden produce the gravitational effect?"
What is different?
What is so different that a mysterious effect called gravity begins to
manifest itself?

--
**** Darla of news:sci.electromagnetics
Be well and come, be welcome.
You are the fifth star!


  #4  
Old December 6th 09, 10:06 AM posted to alt.astronomy
greysky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 115
Default What if (on Darla)


"Darla" wrote in message
g.com...

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Darla Glad I was just talking fiction. Glad your great ship was not
"lost in space" In my novel "Stepping Stones" I had a chapter where in
their search for Earth they came upon a ship that was running on
silicone life. Was going to answer on "fusion" To add it takes great
heat and pressure to create a nuclear reaction in which the nuclei of
atoms combine to produce great energy. Compression force of gravity
makes stars. v Both fusion and fission give nuclear energy. Fission uses
heavy atoms"uranium" Fusion uses the lightest atom hydrogen.(two forms)
Mother nature uses fusion to make stars Humankind makes thermonuclear
weapons(bombs) I have invented a "Pulse fusion machine" to give humans
long lasting free energy. It would take 6 billion bucks to build. I
warned Columbia U that the Tokamak would melt down in seconds when they
bought it from Russia. My fusion machine I guarantee would work for 75
years or more. I would swap my invention just to know the source of
gravity.Go figure Bert your gravity thinking man always


And are you absolutely certain that your fusion machine wouldn't produce
black holes? G

Now, let's see, you want to swap your invention for the source of gravity.
If I made you this swap, then I would have to pay someone 6 billion bucks
to build it.
Hmm.
But you already know the Source of gravity.
What you really want to know is HOW the source of gravity, matter,
produces the gravitational effect, no?
The secret of knowing is in the changes.
Energy does not produce a gravitational effect until it changes into
matter.
Now, energy and matter are sort of like water and ice, aren't they?
Two forms of the same thing?
So ask yourself, "How does energy, when its form changes into matter, all
of a sudden produce the gravitational effect?"
What is different?
What is so different that a mysterious effect called gravity begins to
manifest itself?

--
**** Darla of news:sci.electromagnetics
Be well and come, be welcome.
You are the fifth star!


Energy also exerts a gravitational effect. It is weak when dealing with the
energy of a force or a field (its potential) and is stronger when manifest
in matter because matter is a concentrated form of energy. But, gravity
ought to be a quantum effect, so we must deal with how quantum mechanics
describes mass, namely as a probability wave. A good guess would be that
gravity is a gauge field that arises from the way a matter wavefunction
moves from a high probability at some point in space to a low probability at
some other point infinitely far away. Classically, the gravity of a particle
arises from the surface of the particle only. Under the surface, where the
particle can be described as a homogenous energy distribution, the gravity
vectors arise in all directions and cancel out. Classically, this is why
gravity is so much weaker than electromagnetic forces within a particle: the
electromagnetic force couples to the entire particle while the gravity force
couples only to the 'surface'. Interestingly, it is also possible to have
antigravity, even though we don't see it in nature, all structures arise
from an internal balancing of both gravity (parallel force vectors) and
antigravity (antiparallel force vectors). It will be interesting to see the
expressions on some scientists' faces when they finally do make electrically
neutral antimatter and they see it fall up when dropped...

Greysky






  #5  
Old December 6th 09, 03:09 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (on Darla)

Darla John Wheeler tells us energy can have a gravity field the same as
matter. I go with Wheeler on just about every thing. Nothing can block
gravity. We are immersed in it. Like a squid is immersed in water
pressure at 1,000 feet down. I guarantee my pulse fusion will work. I
took me 60 years of planing. Its big and expensive. No chance of it
creating a black hole. The Cern accelerator can't create a black hole.
I predicted it would melt down when booting up to full power. It was a
gut hunch,with some good physics thrown in. I do not like splice
connections. It is now known one of these splice connections shorted
out. Not hard to figure Bert

  #6  
Old December 6th 09, 03:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (on Darla)

Greysky Gravity is so amazing it could easily have its own dimension..
a supersymmetry all its own. We know we can't get together GR with QM
Talk of 11 dimensions (give me a break) Maybe only the brain of Witten??
Bert

  #7  
Old December 6th 09, 06:54 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Pros Pere[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 120
Default What if (on Darla)


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Greysky Gravity is so amazing it could easily have its own dimension..
a supersymmetry all its own. We know we can't get together GR with QM
Talk of 11 dimensions (give me a break) Maybe only the brain of Witten??
Bert


You humans don't know squat about gravity.
Eleven dimensions, indeed.
How does "sewersymmetry" (congratulations on spelling it correctly) coexist
with the uncertainty principle, Bert?

Gravity DOES have its own dimension.
For humans it's called "the twilight zone".

--
**** the Proz


  #8  
Old December 6th 09, 07:03 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Pros Pere[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 120
Default What if (on Darla)


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Darla John Wheeler tells us energy can have a gravity field the same as
matter. I go with Wheeler on just about every thing. Nothing can block
gravity. We are immersed in it. Like a squid is immersed in water
pressure at 1,000 feet down. I guarantee my pulse fusion will work. I
took me 60 years of planing. Its big and expensive. No chance of it
creating a black hole. The Cern accelerator can't create a black hole.
I predicted it would melt down when booting up to full power. It was a
gut hunch,with some good physics thrown in. I do not like splice
connections. It is now known one of these splice connections shorted
out. Not hard to figure Bert


Wheeler wasn't too shabby... for a human.
And there is nothing wrong with a good splice, Bert.
It's just that the vast majority of your technicians don't have a clue how
to properly splice two wires together.
The splice becomes a source of ohms, gives off heat, thermal runaway,
BSSZZZ..T.
Adios muchachos.

And for Cosmos' sake... not EVERY electrical problem is a "short".
The splice did not "short out", it burned open due to thermal runaway.
These are two different things.
Why do you humans think "shorted out" every time a light bulb peters out?

--
**** the Proz


  #9  
Old December 6th 09, 07:10 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Pros Pere[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 120
Default What if (on Darla)


"greysky" wrote in message
...

"Darla" wrote in message
g.com...

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Darla Glad I was just talking fiction. Glad your great ship was not
"lost in space" In my novel "Stepping Stones" I had a chapter where in
their search for Earth they came upon a ship that was running on
silicone life. Was going to answer on "fusion" To add it takes great
heat and pressure to create a nuclear reaction in which the nuclei of
atoms combine to produce great energy. Compression force of gravity
makes stars. v Both fusion and fission give nuclear energy. Fission uses
heavy atoms"uranium" Fusion uses the lightest atom hydrogen.(two forms)
Mother nature uses fusion to make stars Humankind makes thermonuclear
weapons(bombs) I have invented a "Pulse fusion machine" to give humans
long lasting free energy. It would take 6 billion bucks to build. I
warned Columbia U that the Tokamak would melt down in seconds when they
bought it from Russia. My fusion machine I guarantee would work for 75
years or more. I would swap my invention just to know the source of
gravity.Go figure Bert your gravity thinking man always


And are you absolutely certain that your fusion machine wouldn't produce
black holes? G

Now, let's see, you want to swap your invention for the source of
gravity.
If I made you this swap, then I would have to pay someone 6 billion bucks
to build it.
Hmm.
But you already know the Source of gravity.
What you really want to know is HOW the source of gravity, matter,
produces the gravitational effect, no?
The secret of knowing is in the changes.
Energy does not produce a gravitational effect until it changes into
matter.
Now, energy and matter are sort of like water and ice, aren't they?
Two forms of the same thing?
So ask yourself, "How does energy, when its form changes into matter, all
of a sudden produce the gravitational effect?"
What is different?
What is so different that a mysterious effect called gravity begins to
manifest itself?

--
**** Darla of news:sci.electromagnetics
Be well and come, be welcome.
You are the fifth star!


Energy also exerts a gravitational effect. It is weak when dealing with
the energy of a force or a field (its potential) and is stronger when
manifest in matter because matter is a concentrated form of energy. But,
gravity ought to be a quantum effect, so we must deal with how quantum
mechanics describes mass, namely as a probability wave. A good guess would
be that gravity is a gauge field that arises from the way a matter
wavefunction moves from a high probability at some point in space to a low
probability at some other point infinitely far away. Classically, the
gravity of a particle arises from the surface of the particle only. Under
the surface, where the particle can be described as a homogenous energy
distribution, the gravity vectors arise in all directions and cancel out.
Classically, this is why gravity is so much weaker than electromagnetic
forces within a particle: the electromagnetic force couples to the entire
particle while the gravity force couples only to the 'surface'.
Interestingly, it is also possible to have antigravity, even though we
don't see it in nature, all structures arise from an internal balancing of
both gravity (parallel force vectors) and antigravity (antiparallel force
vectors). It will be interesting to see the expressions on some
scientists' faces when they finally do make electrically neutral
antimatter and they see it fall up when dropped...

Greysky







Greysky, you're one of the better humans here, but there is no such thing as
exerting a gravitational effect.
Neither energy nor matter does this.
It's the age-old problem of the girl walking down a lonesome street in Daisy
Dukes (hot pants).
When she gets raped, is it the rapist's fault? or is it her fault for
"enticing" him?

Newton and Einstein couldn't figure gravity out because they kept thinking
it was her fault.

--
**** the Proz


  #10  
Old December 6th 09, 08:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,635
Default What if (on Darla)

On Dec 6, 10:03*am, "Pros Pere" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message

...

Darla *John Wheeler tells us energy can have a gravity field the same as
matter. I go with Wheeler on just about every thing. Nothing can block
gravity. We are immersed in it. Like a squid is immersed in water
pressure at 1,000 feet down. * *I guarantee my pulse fusion will work. I
took me 60 years of planing. Its big and expensive. No chance of it
creating a black hole. The Cern accelerator can't create a black hole.
I predicted it would melt down when booting up to full power. It was a
gut hunch,with some good physics thrown in. *I do not like splice
connections. It is now known one of these splice connections shorted
out. *Not hard to figure * Bert


Wheeler wasn't too shabby... for a human.



Bert is right. Wheeler and Einstein both took forms of energy other
than mass into account in their theories of gravity. Einstein's
gravity equation takes into account energy factors such pressure
besides mass when calculating a bodies gravity. That's what makes it
so complicated.


And there is nothing wrong with a good splice, Bert.
It's just that the vast majority of your technicians don't have a clue how
to properly splice two wires together.
The splice becomes a source of ohms, gives off heat, thermal runaway,
BSSZZZ..T.
Adios muchachos.

And for Cosmos' sake... not EVERY electrical problem is a "short".
The splice did not "short out", it burned open due to thermal runaway.
These are two different things.
Why do you humans think "shorted out" every time a light bulb peters out?

--
**** the Proz



They should put Art Deco to work on the accelerator at Cern. With all
his years of experience as an electrical engineer, he should know how
to make a good splice by now. And he needs the work!

Double-A

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if (on Darla) G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 9 December 13th 09 04:18 PM
What if (on Darla) G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 November 30th 09 01:57 PM
What if (on Darla) G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 1 November 30th 09 09:30 AM
Did You Get it ? (was Did Darla Box Herself in ?) Doctor Why? Misc 5 December 5th 07 08:43 PM
Darla where are you?? Greysky Misc 12 February 18th 05 05:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.