|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#351
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
On Mar 3, 3:39 am, "frédéric haessig" wrote:
"Rand Simberg" a écrit dans le message denews: 4658a39f.1371870__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_ ... Yes. That's not a fact. I'll forgive you because, though your English is excellent, it's probably not your first language. Apparently you're unfamiliar with the meaning of that word (hint: it doesn't mean merely stating something that later turns out not to be the case). Lying means stating something you know is not true. Which is exactly what Bush did. He had access to reports from the US intelligence community stating that Sadam WMD program was a fake. He ignored them and kept asking for other information until he managed to get which could be interpreted to say what he wanted. Erog, Bush knew. Bush had access to _some_ reports from the US intelligence community stating that Saddam's WMD program was a fake; he had access to many other reports from American and other intelligence agencies stating that these weapons were real. Most informed observers at the time believed that they were real -- even those arguing _against_ an American invasion based their arguments in part on fear of what Saddam would _do_ with his WMD if his back were against the wall. You are, essentially, arguing that Bush "lied" because he went with the reports stating that the weapons were real, at a time when it was far from obvious that these reports were incorrect. An implication of your argument, if true, would be that you consider Bush to have been _far_ smarter and better-informed than other heads of state and intelligence chiefs of the era. Are you willing to stand by this implication? Yes. That's not a fact. Saddam started that war, back in 1989. It never really ended, until he was removed from power. There was simply a long ceasefire, during which he continued to violate its terms, and seventeen Security Council Resolutions relating to it, and shot at our aircraft that were attempting to enforce it. And that's your excuse. Pretty weak. It's apparently strong enough that you don't have a logical counter to it. So I would guess that _your_ position is "weaker." I won't even go into how many dictators used that type of excuse to start wars, appealing to past wrongs and border incidents ( staged or not ) This does not address the point Rand made: that Saddam started the war in 1989 and then violated the truce that ended the hostilities in 1990. Do you actually have any argument or evidence disproving his points? Tens to hundreds of thousands of innocent people were dying under Saddam's regime. Yes. Are you aware that the death call is likely greater in Iraq since 2003 that it has been under all of Saddam's rule ( including Kurd gassing with chemical weapons )? And thus we should abandon the Iraqi people to those who are killing them, the Terrorists? That's no longer happening. Did you weep for them? Yes. Do you weep for the ones which dies because of the US iraq invasion and which would be alive today if not? Would they be? Saddam had a record of launching wars of aggression. I would imagine that if we had removed the sanctions, and left Saddam in charge, by now he would have launched another one. You are (implicitly) assuming that if we removed the sanctions and left Saddam in charge, he would have remained at peace, but that does not follow based on his actions in the past. Two wrongs do not make a right. Saddam was a very bad tyrant. The way bush choose to deal with him was even worse for the iraqi people. How would _you_ have deposed Saddam, in a way which would have been better for the Iraqi people, if you had been President from 2001 to the present? It happens in wars. Which is why waging a war of agression has been made into a crime. Our invasion of Iraq was not a "war of aggression," it was directly provoked by Saddam's numerous violations of the truce. That he won't be is an accusation against USA. laughing For what? For letting politics rule justice to an even bigger degree than in France. In America, we try to avoid making political dissent a crime. Simply because Bush dissented from the position that the US Democrats take _today_ (emphasis because in 2003 they supported the invasion) is not a criminal offense. I'd really likle to see Chirac in front of a judge to at least answer to some question about the system. He may be - though I doubt it -, but he definitely will not be indicted. There's a time limit on petty crime, and even if there wasn't, it would be very difficult to get any proof of wrongdoing. Do you even understand what he is accused of? I find it interesting that taking bribes from a foreign power and guiding his nation's foreign policy based in part on the desire to receive more such bribes in the future is a "petty crime." I'd call that "high treason." Documents reveal that the Iraqi government also gave fourteen million barrels of oil to French businessman Patrick Maugein, whom it considered "a conduit to French president Chirac."[50] The French judiciary has begun investigating leads on the Maugein connection.[51] While citizens of many other countries are involved, few are as senior or as well connected to their governments as the Frenchmen involved. The level of oil-for-food contacts reflects both the high-level of Franco-Iraqi ties, as well as Saddam Hussein's belief that the Chirac administration was an easy target for a campaign of influence." I stated nothing about past friendship between Saddam and Chirac. No, I did that. You know, just to strengthen my case. That's how arguments (as opposed to trolling) work... You are definitely an expert on trolling., as demonstrated by you constant changing of the matter under discussion and distortion of what I said. Thank you for implicitly admitting, by failing to address Simberg's _main point_, that you have no defense for Chirac against the accusation of yielding to this campaign of influence for essentially venal motives. "fox level propaganda"? What in it is false? Too many things for me to bother getting them one by one. Just try a critical analysis and it will be obvious, as long as you're not blinded by preconceptions. Translation from the Haessigian: "I have no rational arguments here, so I say that I am a wiser person than you and hope that my status-claim will serve in the place of logic. Ook! Ook!" (sound effects added to highlight Haessig's chimpanzee-level reasoning). - Jordan |
#352
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
On Mar 3, 10:11 am, Hop David wrote:
Rand Simberg wrote: Oh, this is ridiculous. This is dishonest. "Perhaps Chirac's deepest friendship has been with Saddam Hussein.[30] The two first met in December 1974 when Prime Minister Chirac visited Baghdad to negotiate trade agreements, including the delivery of a nuclear reactor[31] later destroyed by an Israeli air raid in 1981. When Hussein visited France the following September-his only visit to a Western country[32]-then-prime minister Chirac said, "I welcome you as my personal friend. I assure you of my esteem, my consideration, and my affection."[33] From the same time period a photo of Rumsfeld was taken shaking Saddam's hand. The photo was taken after Saddam used poison gas made from chemicals his U.S. friends supplied. Rumsfeld should be shot for his friendship with that murderous ******* Saddam. Rumsfeld merely participated in an alliance of convenience between America and Iraq, against Iran. He did _not_ take bribes from Saddam, and he did not continue the alliance with Saddam _after_ Saddam had turned against civilized states. Do you believe that Roosevelt, Churchill, Truman and Attlee should have been "shot for their friendship with that murderous *******" Stalin? If not, why not? - Jordan |
#353
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Jordan wrote: Thank you for implicitly admitting, by failing to address Simberg's _main point_, that you have no defense for Chirac against the accusation of yielding to this campaign of influence for essentially venal motives. Hey, you know how we are concerned about Iran, and how it might get nuclear weapons? Well, according to this 1999 article in The Jerusalem Post, we may be a bit late on all this: http://www.fas.org/news/iran/1999/980409-iran-jp.htm We attack Iran, and this all could get _really_ interesting. Pat |
#354
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Fred J. McCall wrote: "Eric Chomko" wrote: :On Mar 8, 10:40 am, Pat Flannery wrote: : Fred J. McCall wrote: : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Torture our prisoners!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." : : Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. : : "Mr. President, are you going to pardon Scooter Libby?" : "Scooter who? Never heard of him." : "Mr. President, didn't you considerably cut back funding for the VA, : leading to the sort of of appalling conditions seen at Walter Reed?" : "Walter who? Never heard of him." : "Mr. President, didn't Donald Rumsfeld become the fall guy for this : administration's failures in Iraq?" : "Donald who? Never heard of him." : "Mr. President, it's been said that George Bush is just a mindless : puppet front-man for a bunch of crooks and political wackos who are : doing irreparable harm to this nation, its people, its standing in the : world, and its military forces. What do you think of that statement?" : "George who? Never heard of...hey, wait a second, I resent that. Nobody : talks about my dad like that." :-) : :Makes me think of the presidents list as: : :Reagan :Bush :Clinton :Bush :Clinton : :Nothing is doing more to get another Clinton in the WH other than the :current Bush. And nothing is doing more to keep her (and other Democrats) out than idiots like the preceding. "I Hate George Bush And So Should You" isn't considered an adequate statement of policy by most sane people... Then a whole lot of insane people are going to shake up your world beliefs. At the rate you're going, you're going to welcome death as a way out. Poor Freddy... Eric -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#355
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Fred J. McCall wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: : : :Fred J. McCall wrote: : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Torture our prisoners!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." : : Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. : : :"Mr. President, are you going to pardon Scooter Libby?" :"Scooter who? Never heard of him." :"Mr. President, didn't you considerably cut back funding for the VA, :leading to the sort of of appalling conditions seen at Walter Reed?" :"Walter who? Never heard of him." :"Mr. President, didn't Donald Rumsfeld become the fall guy for this :administration's failures in Iraq?" :"Donald who? Never heard of him." :"Mr. President, it's been said that George Bush is just a mindless uppet front-man for a bunch of crooks and political wackos who are :doing irreparable harm to this nation, its people, its standing in the :world, and its military forces. What do you think of that statement?" :"George who? Never heard of...hey, wait a second, I resent that. Nobody :talks about my dad like that." :-) I repeat - Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. The fact that Pat has you repeating yourself is pure entertainment. Poor Freddy... -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#356
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Fred J. McCall wrote: "Eric Chomko" wrote: :On Mar 8, 1:30 am, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Pat Flannery wrote: : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Torture our prisoners!" : :"Sir, yes sir!" : :"Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." : : Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. : :And you lack a sense of humor. Not at all. I just don't find most political idiocy 'funny'. One's political idiocy is another's political humor. Geez McClod, didn't they teach you a sense of empathy in the Navy? Or were you napping? Maybe your folks were deficient? VICES, McClod. V for vitality, I for intelligence, C for courage, E for empathy, and S for sympathy. Don't get hung up on the acronym, it'll only short your brain. Perhaps you're only a "VIC" or less? :But perhaps you can't help that being a :closed rather than an open person. There's a difference between having an open mind and having a hole in your head, Eric. You demonstrate the latter quite nicely... Perhaps you DO have a sense of humor as I did smile when I read the last sentence. Fine, holes in my head, anything to have you have a sense of humor. You're learning Freddy. When this is all over you might actually become a real human being instead of a terminally pedantic ass which no one wants to be around. Wanna bet who people want to talk to at your dinner party. When was the last time you hosted a dinner party? Invited to one? Be honest... Eric -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#357
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Fred J. McCall wrote: "Eric Chomko" wrote: :On Mar 5, 10:44 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Matt wrote: : :Fred J. McCall wrote: : : Matt wrote: : : : : :snipped : : : : :http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/...177726543.html : : : : Too easily explained as 'disgruntled employee'. Just reading the web : : page cited and noting the phrasing makes it pretty clear that the : : writer is more interested in 'spin' than accuracy. : : : : : :Considering the circumstances of his resignation, yes, he will sound : :like a disgruntled employee. Paraphrasing - "In my job as an analyst, I : :can see there is no evidence of Iraq having WMDs that are a threat, but : :the gov.au is saying that my department backs their assertion that they : :do. I want no part of it." You value your ethical standards, too, right? : : : :The upshot is, if Australian intelligence was aware of this prior to : :troop deployment to Iraq, it's not a stretch to say that so did the : :intelligence agencies of those major countries you mentioned. : : : :Are you shocked that our governments might actually bend the truth for : :the sake of furthering political endeavours? Let's face it, war is good : :for the economy, and we really need that oil.. : : I'm shocked that you can't read 'spin' and recognize it. Hell, I : actually had an English course on propaganda and how it works when I : was in high school and yet here you are not being able to recognize : blatant bias when you read it. : : Ask yourself how much oil the US got from or is getting from Iraq. : :It is about what currency Iraq is accepting for said oil. Saddam dared :to take euros and the current regime is back to using dollars. And so we're back to Eric's favorite conspiracy theory.... No, no, you moron (borrowing from Rand), the JFK assassination is my favorite conspiracy theory. About euros vs. dollars, who conspired and how? Do tell. I mean you have this idea about how I have a conspiracy theory. What is it? What does it look like to you? Eric -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong." -- Thomas Jefferson |
#358
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
"Eric Chomko" wrote:
: :Fred J. McCall wrote: : "Eric Chomko" wrote: : : :On Mar 8, 10:40 am, Pat Flannery wrote: : : Fred J. McCall wrote: : : : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Torture our prisoners!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." : : : : Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. : : : : "Mr. President, are you going to pardon Scooter Libby?" : : "Scooter who? Never heard of him." : : "Mr. President, didn't you considerably cut back funding for the VA, : : leading to the sort of of appalling conditions seen at Walter Reed?" : : "Walter who? Never heard of him." : : "Mr. President, didn't Donald Rumsfeld become the fall guy for this : : administration's failures in Iraq?" : : "Donald who? Never heard of him." : : "Mr. President, it's been said that George Bush is just a mindless : : puppet front-man for a bunch of crooks and political wackos who are : : doing irreparable harm to this nation, its people, its standing in the : : world, and its military forces. What do you think of that statement?" : : "George who? Never heard of...hey, wait a second, I resent that. Nobody : : talks about my dad like that." :-) : : : :Makes me think of the presidents list as: : : : :Reagan : :Bush : :Clinton : :Bush : :Clinton : : : :Nothing is doing more to get another Clinton in the WH other than the : :current Bush. : : And nothing is doing more to keep her (and other Democrats) out than : idiots like the preceding. "I Hate George Bush And So Should You" : isn't considered an adequate statement of policy by most sane : people... : :Then a whole lot of insane people are going to shake up your world :beliefs. Not likely. I don't let idiots dictate my beliefs. :At the rate you're going, you're going to welcome death as a way out. :Poor Freddy... See what I mean about you being an idiot, El Chimpko? -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." -- Mark Twain |
#359
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
"Eric Chomko" wrote:
: :Fred J. McCall wrote: : Pat Flannery wrote: : : : : : : :Fred J. McCall wrote: : : : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Torture our prisoners!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." : : : : Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. : : : : : :"Mr. President, are you going to pardon Scooter Libby?" : :"Scooter who? Never heard of him." : :"Mr. President, didn't you considerably cut back funding for the VA, : :leading to the sort of of appalling conditions seen at Walter Reed?" : :"Walter who? Never heard of him." : :"Mr. President, didn't Donald Rumsfeld become the fall guy for this : :administration's failures in Iraq?" : :"Donald who? Never heard of him." : :"Mr. President, it's been said that George Bush is just a mindless : uppet front-man for a bunch of crooks and political wackos who are : :doing irreparable harm to this nation, its people, its standing in the : :world, and its military forces. What do you think of that statement?" : :"George who? Never heard of...hey, wait a second, I resent that. Nobody : :talks about my dad like that." :-) : : I repeat - Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your : fault. : :The fact that Pat has you repeating yourself is pure entertainment. :Poor Freddy... See what I mean about you being an idiot, El Chimpko? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#360
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
"Eric Chomko" wrote:
: :Fred J. McCall wrote: : "Eric Chomko" wrote: : : :On Mar 8, 1:30 am, Fred J. McCall wrote: : : Pat Flannery wrote: : : : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Torture our prisoners!" : : :"Sir, yes sir!" : : :"Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." : : : : Jesus, you're an idiot sometimes, Pat ... and that IS your fault. : : : :And you lack a sense of humor. : : Not at all. I just don't find most political idiocy 'funny'. : :One's political idiocy is another's political humor. Not really. It's either funny or it isn't. This sort of stupidity isn't. :Geez McClod, :didn't they teach you a sense of empathy in the Navy? No, my job was to kill people and break ****. :Or were you napping? As frequently as possible. The fact that you even ask merely further indicates your ignorance about the real military, where happiness can frequently be composed of merely getting sufficient sleep. :Maybe your folks were deficient? My folks weren't in the Navy. However, if we assume your problem is congenital, it seems obvious that your folks were defectives. :VICES, McClod. V for vitality, I for intelligence, C for courage, E :for empathy, and S for sympathy. Don't get hung up on the acronym, :it'll only short your brain. : :Perhaps you're only a "VIC" or less? The more stupid **** you make up the stupider you look, Eric. : : :But perhaps you can't help that being a : :closed rather than an open person. : : There's a difference between having an open mind and having a hole in : your head, Eric. You demonstrate the latter quite nicely... : :Perhaps you DO have a sense of humor as I did smile when I read the :last sentence. I don't know why. It's an old, tired joke. :Fine, holes in my head, anything to have you have a :sense of humor. You're learning Freddy. All the time, but never from you. :When this is all over you :might actually become a real human being instead of a terminally edantic ass which no one wants to be around. What 'this' do you stupidly think is going on, Eric? :Wanna bet who people want to talk to at your dinner party. When was :the last time you hosted a dinner party? Invited to one? Be honest... I've never cared for dinner parties, so I don't have them. I stick to things I enjoy. I have the luxury of doing that, you see. Why would I want to host a dinner party, El Chimpko? -- "It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Limited ASAT test ban treaty | Totorkon | Policy | 3 | March 9th 07 03:19 AM |
Outer Space Treaty | John Schilling | Policy | 24 | May 24th 06 03:14 PM |
Bush to Withdraw from Outer Space Treaty, Annex the Moon | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 7 | April 2nd 05 08:02 PM |