|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#331
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Fred J. McCall wrote: Hint: If it was all about oil, we'd have invaded Canada. We get a lot more oil from them, they're closer, and the women are probably friendlier. But Canada wouldn't try to undercut OPECs oil prices, leading to lower worldwide oil prices and the end of Exxon's record-breaking profits...Iraq was thinking about that strategy: http://www.maconareaonline.com/news.asp?id=10198 Pat |
#332
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
On Mar 5, 10:21 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
There probably wouldn't have been any available. They'd just started going into service a few years before. The numerous refuelings of the F-111's on the strike mission were done by KC-10's flying in group with them (the Extenders were refueled in turn by KC-135's). Chris Manteuffel |
#333
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
The Commodore unto "Jordan": greetings.
Re the sea of atomic glass which used to be the Islamic Republic of Iran -- let us hope the Ayatollahs see reason as written in the Qur'an and expanded in the Hadith. At the same time, let us hope that all sides see reason, and that the sea of atomic glass which used to be the Islamic Republic of Iran remains fictional, and that the Euphrates River flows gently through the area. |
#334
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Pat Flannery wrote:
: : :Fred J. McCall wrote: : Hint: If it was all about oil, we'd have invaded Canada. We get a : lot more oil from them, they're closer, and the women are probably : friendlier. : : :But Canada wouldn't try to undercut OPECs oil prices, leading to lower :worldwide oil prices and the end of Exxon's record-breaking rofits...Iraq was thinking about that strategy: :http://www.maconareaonline.com/news.asp?id=10198 Why would we care if Iraq broke the OPEC cartel? I'd think we'd rather like the idea. Or is this just another silly, ideological 'oil is evil' spiel? -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates |
#335
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
"Christopher Manteuffel" wrote:
:On Mar 5, 10:21 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: : : There probably wouldn't have been any available. They'd just started : going into service a few years before. : :The numerous refuelings of the F-111's on the strike mission were done :by KC-10's flying in group with them (the Extenders were refueled in :turn by KC-135's). And you think they'd have made them available for a USN strike? Hell, you can't rely on getting USAF gas when it's in the Op Order NOW and life is a lot more 'purple' than it was then. -- "It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer |
#336
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
On Mar 6, 11:02 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
And you think they'd have made them available for a USN strike? If the President approved a (presumably Navy generated) plan that called for that, then yes. Obeying legal orders from the President is what military officers do. Chris Manteuffel |
#337
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Leonard C Robinson wrote: At the same time, let us hope that all sides see reason, and that the sea of atomic glass which used to be the Islamic Republic of Iran remains fictional, and that the Euphrates River flows gently through the area. The Euphrates is in Iraq, not Iran. The Garden Of Eden was also in Iraq according to the biblical description of its location, which shows you how the neighborhood has gone downhill. :-) Pat |
#338
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
"Christopher Manteuffel" wrote:
:On Mar 6, 11:02 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: : : And you think they'd have made them available for a USN strike? : :If the President approved a (presumably Navy generated) plan that :called for that, then yes. Obeying legal orders from the President is :what military officers do. I repeat - you can't rely on USAF gas when the operational order says they're supposed to service USN aircraft NOW, and it's a lot more purple world now than it was then. -- "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm. -- George Orwell |
#339
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Christopher Manteuffel wrote: If the President approved a (presumably Navy generated) plan that called for that, then yes. Obeying legal orders from the President is what military officers do. "Dubya says: 'Invade Afganistan'!" "Sir, yes sir!" "Dubya says: 'Invade Iraq'!" "Sir, yes sir!" "Torture our prisoners!" "Sir, yes sir!" "Heh-heh...I didn't say: 'Dubya says', so it's not my fault, ****ers." Pat |
#340
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye INF treaty?
Fred J. McCall wrote: Why would we care if Iraq broke the OPEC cartel? I'd think we'd rather like the idea. Oh, _we_ would....big oil wouldn't, as its profits then drop as oil prices decline. Read the article, the neocons got taken to the cleaners by big oil. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Limited ASAT test ban treaty | Totorkon | Policy | 3 | March 9th 07 02:19 AM |
Outer Space Treaty | John Schilling | Policy | 24 | May 24th 06 03:14 PM |
Bush to Withdraw from Outer Space Treaty, Annex the Moon | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 7 | April 2nd 05 08:02 PM |