|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Principia of Newton in 1687 was first axiom set over physicsChapt16.18 Axioms for Physics in history of science #1501 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
I need to be accurate in the history of physics and the history of
science. And so far I have not been accurate. In some of my previous posts I made statements to the effect that physics has no axiom set or never had a axiom set to be the foundation of physics. Elsewhere I commented that Newton's laws of motion in his Principia of 1687 was a axiomatic physics. So I need to correct this error of mine with this chapter on the history of physics. So where does physics stand as far as being axiomatic and not axiomatic? Well, the history shows us that before Newton, physics had no axiom set and then after Newton the laws of motion by Newton served as a axiom set over all of physics. Which begs the question of where physics lost its axiomatic foundation? Now I do not recall if ever that Maxwell sat down to see if the Maxwell Equations derive all the laws of Newtonian motion. I suspect Maxwell had done so and is rather an easy task. But that effort seems to have been lost. But the main question is where did Physics abandon axioms to govern all of physics, to keep the compartments of physics consistent, to throw out any physics which contradicts the axioms and to predict future truths of physics by working with the axioms. So where in history did the Physics community go astray and have no axioms to guide the subject? My guess is that by 1899 and 1900 with Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, the subject of physics was in such turmoil that even the most precious characteristics of physics-- an axiom set was thrown out. And where each compartment of physics, like "hippies, did their own thing, a hippie physics." You see if Maxwell had derived Newtonian motion from the Maxwell Equations and that James Maxwell could have declared to the Physics community as a whole, that these equations are the "new axioms over all of physics" that much of the fake physics of the 20th century would have all been avoided and thrown out as trash before they took root and filled physics with that nonsense-- Big Bang, black-holes, Cooper pairing, Higgs boson, Standard Model, Newtonian gravity and General Relativity, pulsars as neutron stars, quasars as black holes, redshift as Doppler when it is curvature-redshift, light waves as single transverse when it is double transverse and on and on of a huge list of fake physics. So in the history of physics, they did have a axiom system of the Newton laws of motion and the date of Principia of 1687 is pretty much near the date of geology adopting the Uniformity Principle since geology was inflicted by the trespasses of religion and could not use Newton's law of motion as the axioms of geology, so did a second best-- adopt the Uniformity principle. Now I am thankful that physics never adopted the Maxwell Equations as the axioms of physics from 1860's to present day time. Thankful because if physicists had been keen and bright and smart by adopting the Maxwell Equations as axioms, then the theories of Atom Totality, double transverse waves, gravity as EM-gravity, Strong Nuclear force as merely a chemical bond, the Fusion Barrier Principle, and many more would have all been discovered not by me, but someone in the 20th century after applying the Maxwell Equations to physics. So you see, what was their blunder is now my gain. Now the next book I am going to write a new edition is the geology book in which I place a axiom set as the foundation of geology. All of geology comes from the Maxwell Equations. One example is that Continental Drift is not what we were taught in school as plates floating on top of convection cells inside of Earth, but rather, Continental Drift of plate tectonics has more to do with electricity and magnetism in that for example a pot placed on top of a refrigerator and the electric motor creates vibration which is transfered to the pot on top and slowly moves the pot until it falls off the refrigerator. Another example is all the electricity from lightening bolt flashes that penetrate into the interior of Earth and cause or facilitate the movement of plate tectonics. So we can begin to see that all of geology needs rewriting where the Maxwell Equations are the embedded axiom set and foundation. -- This is posted to misc.legal in hopes of finding a lawyer to sue or shutdown Niuz.biz for using the posts of AP as bait and lure so that they can attach malware to some innocent person's computer when opening the post, which Google flags and describes as potentially harming your computer. 
Recently, and ongoing, Niuz.biz (Docendi.org) threatens to harm your computer if
opening a post of mine that they have archived. There should be a law against the practices of Niuz.biz of using posts of
others as bait and lure. 
What Docendi.org is doing is establishing malware on innocent victims
and a global filter or block on all of AP's post by threatening to 
harm computers and perhaps is the cause of why AP's posts are no longer author archived in Google starting May 2012. Maybe Docendi is connected to Google? Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here : http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 09 08:29 AM |
NOVA doing science-fiction instead of science "Monster of the MilkyWay" #174; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 28th 09 04:45 AM |
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 13th 09 04:00 PM |
#1 new book; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANGTHEORY IN PHYSICS | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 13 | May 1st 09 06:25 AM |