A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 17th 05, 06:27 PM posted to sci.astro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY

SUBJECT: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE

PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
THE FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION
Copyright 1984-2005 Allen C. Goodrich
ISBN 0-9644267,LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CAT.CARD
NO.94-90554

Based on the first law of thermodynamics
The total energy of the universe is a constant.
(total kinetic (mass) energy plus total potential
energy is a constant).
m is any mass say that of the earth.
Planets, moons, and electrons are normally in equilibrium
orbits where the total energy is constant.
m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 + G(M-m)m/L+ X e(2 pi L)^2/t^2 +
Z e^2/4 pi E_o L = a constant
(In the absence of a charge)
From this equation the equation

Delta m (2 pi L)^2 / t^2 = - Delta G (M-m)m/L
follows mathematically
POTENTIAL ENERGY = G(M-m)m/L
KINETIC ENERGY = m(2 pi L)^2/t^2
G= Gravitational constant; M = total energy
of the universe (or effective universe) ;
m = mass in question.
t = time ; L = orbital radial distance.
This is the only value of L where no change of total energy
will occur if the value of L changes. Constant total energy fixes the
orbital radius L.
Orbital motion conserves total energy.
Force of gravity isn't needed to explain orbital
motion. .

  #2  
Old December 4th 05, 10:22 PM posted to sci.astro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY

On 17 Nov 2005 10:27:27 -0800, "ACE" wrote, in
part:

POTENTIAL ENERGY = G(M-m)m/L
KINETIC ENERGY = m(2 pi L)^2/t^2


Orbital motion conserves total energy.
Force of gravity isn't needed to explain orbital
motion. .


If there is no force coming from the Sun to act on things which orbit
it, why do they have any "potential energy" that is dependent on their
distance from the Sun?

John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY ACE Astronomy Misc 0 October 16th 05 08:16 PM
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY ACE Astronomy Misc 0 September 20th 05 12:56 PM
PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMO ACE Astronomy Misc 1 July 26th 05 10:21 AM
Two years of amazing discoveries for Canada's "Humble Space Telescope"(Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 1 July 21st 05 12:27 AM
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 04 02:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.