A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's Relativity and the Principle of Maximum Absurdity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 26th 20, 11:40 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein's Relativity and the Principle of Maximum Absurdity

Theories containing absurdities are doomed, but if the absurdity is too great, an idiocy, critics are paralyzed and the idiocy reigns supreme.

In 1918 Einstein informed the gullible world that, as the traveling clock (twin) turns around and experiences acceleration, a HOMOGENEOUS GRAVITATIONAL FIELD emerges. This homogeneous gravitational field somehow affects the distant stay-at-home clock and makes it run very fast (which means that the stay-at-home twin suddenly gets very old) during the turning-around period:

Albert Einstein 1918: "A homogeneous gravitational field appears, that is directed towards the positive x-axis. Clock U1 is accelerated in the direction of the positive x-axis until it has reached the velocity v, then the gravitational field disappears again. An external force, acting upon U2 in the negative direction of the x-axis prevents U2 from being set in motion by the gravitational field. [...] According to the general theory of relativity, a clock will go faster the higher the gravitational potential of the location where it is located, and during partial process 3 U2 happens to be located at a higher gravitational potential than U1. The calculation shows that this speeding ahead constitutes exactly twice as much as the lagging behind during the partial processes 2 and 4." http://sciliterature.50webs.com/Dialog.htm

A modern version of the 1918 idiocy (the "homogeneous gravitational field" is transformed into "enough strangeness"):

David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow, but enough strangeness occurs during the turning-around period to make A end up older. Note, however, that a discussion of acceleration is not required to quantitatively understand the paradox..." http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11..pdf

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity and the Principle of Maximum Absurdity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 November 24th 17 05:22 PM
ABSURDITY OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 October 10th 15 07:14 PM
EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : THE TWIN ABSURDITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 December 7th 14 07:50 AM
EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : THE BUG-RIVET ABSURDITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 March 18th 14 11:52 PM
THE OBVIOUS ABSURDITY OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 6 December 3rd 13 11:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.