Felxibility of Apollo design (was Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis) )

		Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Felxibility of Apollo design (was Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis) )

Felxibility of Apollo design (was Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis) )

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Display Modes

#25

December 10th 04, 10:18 PM

Scott Hedrick

external usenet poster

Posts: n/a

"Derek Lyons" wrote in message
...

Reentry.

Is a very brief portion of the total mission, not the total mission.
Without a SM, you'll never complete the mission and get to reenter.

I believe you said: "the CM is wedded always and forever to a SM."

Not only is this not true, but in fact there is a portion of *each and every
mission* in which, if it were true, it would lead to a loss of the vehicle
and crew.

Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis)	Michael Kent	Policy	1	December 3rd 04 05:26 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-)	Nathan Jones	Misc	6	July 29th 04 06:14 AM
Apollo	Buzz alDredge	Astronomy Misc	5	July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ	darla	UK Astronomy	11	July 25th 04 02:57 PM
Space Station Agency Leaders Look To The Future	Ron Baalke	Space Shuttle	0	July 30th 03 05:51 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 PM.