|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Glazer, What have you been smoking this week? Well whatever it is its way too
strong for you! You define the expression "In way over your head!" G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hans Black is not a color.The cartoon physicist that named it was "John Wheeler"(i think he is still alive?) Physicists don't ague with Wheeler. I wonder what happens to quarks and gluons when passing through the event horizon? My own theory has the strong force,as a modification(face of) of gravity. Could we call a BH a quark hole? (QH) Hole fits well. Could we think of a blackhole as having only three dimensions(since it took time away)? Could we think of it having extra dimensions since it has a gravity tunnel that can enter other universes (kip Thorne) I sometimes think of blackholes as putty,and I can mold it into any thing that comes to mind. Bert PS One more question. What holds the BH up? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Hans wrote:
Glazer, What have you been smoking this week? Well whatever it is its way too strong for you! You define the expression "In way over your head!" G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hole fits well. Could we think of a blackhole as having only three dimensions(since it took time away)? Could we think of it having extra dimensions since it has a gravity tunnel that can enter other universes Let me go in over my head here, too, then. Don't we mix up the model and the object up when we talk of of eg. space *being* 3-dimensional, n-dimensional, etc.? Surely the "dimensionality" of whatever we choose to describe is simply a reflection of the minimum data set we need to describe what we see of it? So when it comes to the black hole, the only dimensions you need when describing it are its minimum measurements. As I understand it, we have these things modelled as points at present, so even one-dimensionality sounds like overkill - apart from the three dimensions you can use to adequately locate it in the flat part of spacetime (which stretched as far as we can currently observe when last I read anything about this). Once you've located the black hole according some mapping system that places it in the space we're "familiar" with, the only further fact you have is "Here is a black hole". The statement gives all its spatial dimensions. (But then us bits of matter around the black hole might also be seen as mere side effects ... glug glug glug ... drowned)) -- Clear Skies, Slow Eddy. Have you noticed how on some nights the sky gets so black that it seems to shine? Bright darkness to you, too. Spam he |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jets Spout Far Closer to Black Hole Than Thought, Scientists Say(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 6 | January 7th 04 11:49 PM |
The universe is expending. | sooncf | SETI | 24 | November 5th 03 03:24 PM |
VLT Observes Infrared Flares from Black Hole at Galactic Centre (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 29th 03 09:05 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
Link between Black Holes and Galaxies Discovered in Our Own Backyard(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 07:36 PM |