|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate:
http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html Pat |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
Pat Flannery wrote:
Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate: http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html So, is the Great Galactic Ghoul visiting its hunger on Earth climate satellites or something? Fairing separation isn't supposed to be one of the more difficult aspects of a launch is it? The conspiracy theorist in me is trying very hard to break free.... rick jones -- Process shall set you free from the need for rational thought. these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
On Mar 4, 5:04*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate:http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html Pat OCO + Glory = 2+ billion down the toilet / Brad Guth First the foiled OCO mission and now there’s Glory, each foiled by using the same method because they were each capable of mapping and quantifying the atmospheric pollution in ways that would have made Big Energy and heavy industry look a whole lot more responsible than published and touted by their supporters and insiders. Apparently Earth science missions are getting put on hold as long as Big Energy and the Rothschilds have our private parts squeezed in their spendy energy and global domination death-grip. There was supposedly an investigation as to why and how the OCO mission got foiled by the very same stuck shroud method, and as usual nothing investigative ever materialized, not even the recovery of anything that was known to exist within a given km2 area of the ocean. Now there’s two mission related shrouds and their payloads to get recovered, and I bet nothing happens because Big Energy and heavy industry doesn’t want anything to happen. The cost of each mission isn’t limited to those amounts reported, but more likely the all-inclusive cost is at least twice those reported amounts. So, once again our NASA has failed us in more ways than most would care to mention, not even counting the years of wasted talent, expertise and the added global pollution impact from each foiled launch. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
On Mar 4, 1:07*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
On 3/4/2011 9:34 AM, Rick Jones wrote: Pat *wrote: Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate: http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html So, is the Great Galactic Ghoul visiting its hunger on Earth climate satellites or something? *Fairing separation isn't supposed to be one of the more difficult aspects of a launch is it? *The conspiracy theorist in me is trying very hard to break free.... That's just what I thought, the loss of two satellites, both of which could have shown a link between man-made CO2 levels and global warming was a bit convenient, wasn't it? Pat If those of Big Energy and heavy industry do not want anything quantified or otherwise mapped to any detail, then it's just not going to happen. OCO + Glory = 2+ billion down the toilet: First the foiled OCO mission and now there’s Glory, each foiled by using the same method because they were each capable of mapping and quantifying the atmospheric pollution in ways that would have made Big Energy and heavy industry look a whole lot more responsible than published and touted by their supporters and insiders. Apparently Earth science missions are getting put on hold as long as Big Energy and the Rothschilds have our private parts squeezed in their spendy energy and global domination death-grip. There was supposedly an investigation as to why and how the OCO mission got foiled by the very same stuck shroud method, and as usual nothing investigative ever materialized, not even the recovery of anything that was known to exist within a given km2 area of the ocean. Now there’s two mission related shrouds and their payloads to get recovered, and I bet nothing happens because Big Energy and heavy industry doesn’t want anything to happen. The cost of each mission isn’t limited to those amounts reported, but more likely the all-inclusive cost is at least twice those reported amounts. So, once again our NASA has failed us in more ways than most would care to mention, not even counting the years of wasted talent, expertise and the added global pollution impact from each foiled launch. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
On 3/4/2011 9:34 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
Pat wrote: Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate: http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html So, is the Great Galactic Ghoul visiting its hunger on Earth climate satellites or something? Fairing separation isn't supposed to be one of the more difficult aspects of a launch is it? The conspiracy theorist in me is trying very hard to break free.... That's just what I thought, the loss of two satellites, both of which could have shown a link between man-made CO2 levels and global warming was a bit convenient, wasn't it? Pat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
Le 04/03/11 14:04, Pat Flannery a écrit :
Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate: http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html Pat I remember that when an Indian launcher failed last December, here, in this forum, an anonymous coward signing as "Dave U Random" posted: "**** colored lose another launcher" (25/12/10 20:12) When it is the U.S. that fails, I do not see: "**** colored lose yet another satellite" Strange isn't it? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
big business will get interested in global warming when the wall
streeters get their 5K shoes wet takking boatsd to work...... then they will begin to care. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
On Mar 4, 2:04*pm, jacob navia wrote:
Le 04/03/11 14:04, Pat Flannery a crit : Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate: http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html Pat I remember that when an Indian launcher failed last December, here, in this forum, *an anonymous coward signing as "Dave U Random" posted: "**** colored lose another launcher" (25/12/10 20:12) When it is the U.S. that fails, I do not see: "**** colored lose yet another satellite" Strange isn't it? Not strange at all, because most of NASA's *******s and rusemasters that contribute here are God certified as bigots and racists. OCO + Glory = 2+ billion down the toilet: First the foiled OCO mission and now there’s Glory, each of these foiled by using the same stuck shroud method, all because they were each capable of detail mapping and quantifying the atmospheric pollution in ways that would have made Big Energy and heavy industry look a whole lot more responsible than published and touted by their supporters and insiders. Apparently Earth science missions are getting put on hold as long as Big Energy and the Rothschilds have our private parts squeezed in their spendy energy and global domination death-grip. There was supposedly an investigation as to why and how the OCO mission got foiled by the very same stuck shroud method, and as usual nothing investigative ever materialized, not even the recovery of anything that was known to exist within a given km2 area of the ocean. Now there’s two mission related shrouds and their payloads to get recovered, and I bet nothing happens because Big Energy and heavy industry doesn’t want anything to happen. The cost of each mission certainly isn’t limited to those amounts reported, but more likely the all-inclusive cost is at least twice those reported amounts. So, once again our dysfunctional NASA has failed us in more ways than most would care to mention, not even counting the years of wasted talent, expertise and the added global pollution impact from each foiled launch. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
On Mar 4, 6:32*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 4, 2:04*pm, jacob navia wrote: Le 04/03/11 14:04, Pat Flannery a crit : Due to the same problem;,the nose aerodynamic shroud failed to separate: http://spaceflightnow.com/taurus/glory/status.html Pat I remember that when an Indian launcher failed last December, here, in this forum, *an anonymous coward signing as "Dave U Random" posted: "**** colored lose another launcher" (25/12/10 20:12) When it is the U.S. that fails, I do not see: "**** colored lose yet another satellite" Strange isn't it? Not strange at all, because most of NASA's *******s and rusemasters that contribute here are God certified as bigots and racists. OCO + Glory = 2+ billion down the toilet: First the foiled OCO mission and now there’s Glory, each of these foiled by using the same stuck shroud method, all because they were each capable of detail mapping and quantifying the atmospheric pollution in ways that would have made Big Energy and heavy industry look a whole lot more responsible than published and touted by their supporters and insiders. Apparently Earth science missions are getting put on hold as long as Big Energy and the Rothschilds have our private parts squeezed in their spendy energy and global domination death-grip. There was supposedly an investigation as to why and how the OCO mission got foiled by the very same stuck shroud method, and as usual nothing investigative ever materialized, not even the recovery of anything that was known to exist within a given km2 area of the ocean. *Now there’s two mission related shrouds and their payloads to get recovered, and I bet nothing happens because Big Energy and heavy industry doesn’t want anything to happen. The cost of each mission certainly isn’t limited to those amounts reported, but more likely the all-inclusive cost is at least twice those reported amounts. *So, once again our dysfunctional NASA has failed us in more ways than most would care to mention, not even counting the years of wasted talent, expertise and the added global pollution impact from each foiled launch. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - perhaps these science missions are poorly funded, since the ISS shuttle suck up nearly all of nasas budget..... leaving a shortfall that ends in big losses |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Taurus fails for second time in row
That's just what I thought, the loss of two satellites, both of which could have shown a link between man-made CO2 levels and global warming was a bit convenient, wasn't it? To be a true paraoid situation you need multiple directions, those responsible a 1) Big oil out to stop data that will prove connection betweenCO2 and global warming. 2) NASA Pseudo Scientists that are afraid the satellites will prove their conclusions were based on cherry picked data 3) The group that developed the satellites and came to the realization that they wouldn't work as promised. 4) Someone interested in destroying the Launcher company. 4a) small new start company 4b) large established company feeling insecure 5) A simple unkown nutjob or terrorist. 6) inept pad personnel hired because they married somebodies sister. "Duh were those connectors supposed to be connected before da launch." 7) Members of a religious cult that want global warming unchecked to punish humanity for it's misdeeds. OK now we got 26 chapters of adventure as they prep for the next launch and the Federal Bureau of Launch Failures key operative, Farnsworrth Featherstoon IV trys to stop another failure without neglecting the hookers of washington, his superb collection of vintage World War I aircraft, and the worlds largest collection of carniverous marigolds. Val Kraut |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taurus 2 booster update | Pat Flannery | History | 4 | January 29th 10 12:32 AM |
M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus | Anthony Ayiomamitis | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | November 6th 06 07:21 PM |
M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus | Anthony Ayiomamitis | UK Astronomy | 14 | November 6th 06 07:21 PM |
Machholz leaves Taurus - tonight's pic | Maurice Gavin | UK Astronomy | 0 | January 10th 05 10:50 PM |
Taurus Delay | ed kyle | Policy | 0 | December 12th 03 02:59 PM |