Lockheed: Perpetrated the 9-11 Attack on the USA Ping MHVW: VVF nomiation. Was Water: Free Energy

X-No Archive-YesOn Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:26:42 GMT, *
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:24:17 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

X-No Archive-YesOn Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:09:41 GMT, *
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:23:53 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

"The Saucer" at Groom Lake?

Yes, the one deliberately left on the runway at Holloman AFB in 1973
by the aliens, which is now buried at Groom Lake.

Where are all the others?

There is only one.

The Agency
absolutely knows there were more than one taken there.

All the US presidents and their cabinet members since 1973 know differently.

snip

They know what the Agency wants them to know.
snip

And precisely how does that make the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake
disappear?

Never said it did. And why do you insist on under reporting the number
of saucers at Groom Lake?



Widdershins

The proof of a conspiracy, is the absolute lack of
evidence that there is one.

In article , Carl R. Osterwald
wrote:

When challenged to produce her alleged UFO pictures:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Got any snaps of your saucer?

Yeppers.

So post 'em.

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

The reptilians.

And why do they claim ownership?


Because they have the title?

She replied:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:43:00 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[..]

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

The reptilians.

Don't be stupid. Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

And why is Lockheed in partnership with the Department of Energy?

In other words, she has no such pictures.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

In article , Carl R. Osterwald
wrote:

When challenged to produce her alleged UFO pictures:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Got any snaps of your saucer?

Yeppers.

So post 'em.

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

The reptilians.

And why do they claim ownership?


Because they have the title?

She replied:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:43:00 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[..]

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

The reptilians.

Don't be stupid. Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

And why is Lockheed in partnership with the Department of Energy?

In other words, she has no such pictures.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:59:45 +0200, "lombo243" [email protected] wrote:

English isn't your first language is it?

So since you or another of your sock puppet paid Usenet poster has taken up
the gauntlet, how about answering the questions posed earlier? Or are you
not at liberty to answer them. What is Lockheed, a Gestapo 'defense
contractor' or what? And why would a 'defense contractor' who makes
billions off war be interested in going to Mars, eh?

snip

You already killed all your credibility but when you have
some basic knowledge then at least we could start a more interesting
conversation.

Just answer the questions, that should be lively enough conversation for
anyone.


And one more thing, please stop referencing the greys or which race you ever
are talking about and you are a slave from with "The aliens". There are
different species and you do not right to many of them when you say the
aliens.

Ok, Mr. Big Shot pardon the pun, name the other extraterrestrial species
visiting earth. And after that explain why Lockheed is having problem with
their hardware being removed from space and their satellites mysteriously
tampered with?

you really don't know when to stop, do you?

Well you could always kill me or better yet censor me from Usenet like
Lockheed did for almost a year, until their satellites began to malfunction,
that is.

Answers please:

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:59:45 +0200, "lombo243" [email protected] wrote:

English isn't your first language is it?

So since you or another of your sock puppet paid Usenet poster has taken up
the gauntlet, how about answering the questions posed earlier? Or are you
not at liberty to answer them. What is Lockheed, a Gestapo 'defense
contractor' or what? And why would a 'defense contractor' who makes
billions off war be interested in going to Mars, eh?

snip

You already killed all your credibility but when you have
some basic knowledge then at least we could start a more interesting
conversation.

Just answer the questions, that should be lively enough conversation for
anyone.


And one more thing, please stop referencing the greys or which race you ever
are talking about and you are a slave from with "The aliens". There are
different species and you do not right to many of them when you say the
aliens.

Ok, Mr. Big Shot pardon the pun, name the other extraterrestrial species
visiting earth. And after that explain why Lockheed is having problem with
their hardware being removed from space and their satellites mysteriously
tampered with?

you really don't know when to stop, do you?

Well you could always kill me or better yet censor me from Usenet like
Lockheed did for almost a year, until their satellites began to malfunction,
that is.

Answers please:

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:43:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:17:39 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

Another merry-go-round cycle is complete.


Ah but your Lockheed merry-go-round isn't so merry.

They'd kill you and your family in a heartbeat if there was money in it for
them.

Fool. Complete and utter stupid fool.

I've got better things to do with what time today than dignify disgusting
trash such as yourself with further responses.

People like you have no self-respect. You're scum of the earth.

Nice meltdown, Alexa.

Nope, the truth.

So why is it your bosses restrict your freedom of speech?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:43:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:17:39 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

Another merry-go-round cycle is complete.


Ah but your Lockheed merry-go-round isn't so merry.

They'd kill you and your family in a heartbeat if there was money in it for
them.

Fool. Complete and utter stupid fool.

I've got better things to do with what time today than dignify disgusting
trash such as yourself with further responses.

People like you have no self-respect. You're scum of the earth.

Nice meltdown, Alexa.

Nope, the truth.

So why is it your bosses restrict your freedom of speech?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:01:35 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[..]


Never said it did. And why do you insist on under reporting the number
of saucers at Groom Lake?


There's only one extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:01:35 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[..]


Never said it did. And why do you insist on under reporting the number
of saucers at Groom Lake?


There's only one extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:09:08 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

snip

There are no unidentified flying objects at Groom Lake, there is however an
extraterrestrial saucer, which is not flying -- and can not be flown by
human beings.