Lockheed: Perpetrated the 9-11 Attack on the USA Ping MHVW: VVF nomiation. Was Water: Free Energy

X-No Archive-YesOn Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:09:41 GMT, *
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:23:53 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

"The Saucer" at Groom Lake?

Yes, the one deliberately left on the runway at Holloman AFB in 1973
by the aliens, which is now buried at Groom Lake.

Where are all the others?

There is only one.

The Agency
absolutely knows there were more than one taken there.

All the US presidents and their cabinet members since 1973 know differently.

snip
They know what the Agency wants them to know.

We are dyslexic of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will
be AssLaminated.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:24:17 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

X-No Archive-YesOn Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:09:41 GMT, *
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:23:53 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

"The Saucer" at Groom Lake?

Yes, the one deliberately left on the runway at Holloman AFB in 1973
by the aliens, which is now buried at Groom Lake.

Where are all the others?

There is only one.

The Agency
absolutely knows there were more than one taken there.

All the US presidents and their cabinet members since 1973 know differently.

snip

They know what the Agency wants them to know.
snip

And precisely how does that make the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake
disappear?

X-No Archive-YesOn Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:55:52 GMT, *
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:30:03 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 03:24:49 GMT, "Bookman"
wrote:

[...]

Facts don't need proof, they're already proven.

Facts are proven by repeated demonstration, or they are k'lames.

Once something is capable of being weighed or measured it is proven to exist
and that becomes fact.

Go look at the alien saucer at Groom Lake for yourself.

snip

When you gonna live on welder-power, Alexa?

Do you have access to Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal spying on
Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Once again the Alexa merry-go-round comes full circle.

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

You've already been told that Lockheed is not in charge of
anything. Check the links to the USDA,


Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

You're not paying attention. Lockheed is not hiding anything at
Groom. Yes, there are saucers there. Lockheed has **** all to
do with them. They are in the custody and charge of USDA, and Parks.

Try to pay attention. The saucers (note plural) are located in an
underground hangar at Groom Lake. What the Administration gets
to see is a non-flying mock-up.


And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

Wrong! The U.S. Constitution has nothing to do with Usenet. Read the
Constitution. It prohibits the government from abridging free speech.
It does not guarantee free speech on Usenet. It merely keeps the
government from shutting people up in public forums. And before you
say Usenet is such a forum, let me assure you that just because think
you are posting here for free, doesn't make Usenet "public" in the
context of the Constitution. Trust me on this one.

I don't give a **** what you spout on Usenet. Most people treat you aa
a nut anyway. But if you're going to try to blow the whistle on the
Groom Lake assets, get your facts straight.

I have told you all I'm authorized to by the Agency.

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

The NSA doesn't know what's going on. They're further out of the loop
than the DoD.



Widdershins (not my real name)

The proof of a conspiracy, is the absolute lack of
evidence that there is one.

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Got any snaps of your saucer?

Yeppers.

So post 'em.

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

The reptilians.

And why do they claim ownership?


Because they have the title?


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:32:04 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]


Um, your "questions" imply an uberconspiracy of the highest order. I
would think someone with an IQ of 200 might possibly understand.

Ah, so you're NOT stupid, as you appear! And you work for Lockheed, right.

There is a conspiracy of the highest order, right?

Then that would explain why you evade and refuse to answer the questions,
unless of course you'd like to clear up your conspiracy claim by answering
them:

prediction: you won't, but will continue to evade then and attack the
messenger

Do you really believe in kooks? And do you really believe that Echelon is
operating in the national security interests of the citizens of United
States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks
on
the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:32:04 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]


Um, your "questions" imply an uberconspiracy of the highest order. I
would think someone with an IQ of 200 might possibly understand.

Ah, so you're NOT stupid, as you appear! And you work for Lockheed, right.

There is a conspiracy of the highest order, right?

Then that would explain why you evade and refuse to answer the questions,
unless of course you'd like to clear up your conspiracy claim by answering
them:

prediction: you won't, but will continue to evade then and attack the
messenger

Do you really believe in kooks? And do you really believe that Echelon is
operating in the national security interests of the citizens of United
States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks
on
the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:40:00 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

There is zero evidence for your oft-repeated UFO story.

The proof is at Groom Lake. Can you make the extraterrestrial saucer
disappear by your Usenet ranting?

And why is Lockheed in 'partnership' with the DoE at Groom Lake?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:40:18 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

I don't give a **** what you spout on Usenet.

Then why bother to reply?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:41:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

And precisely how does that make the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake
disappear?

Why can't you back up your UFO claims?

I'm not making a claim. I am merely reporting a FACT that anyone can see
for themselves, and have.

Why is Lockheed in partnership with the DoE?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:43:00 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[..]

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

The reptilians.

Don't be stupid. Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

And why is Lockheed in partnership with the Department of Energy?