Lockheed: Perpetrated the 9-11 Attack on the USA Ping MHVW: VVF nomiation. Was Water: Free Energy

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:50:03 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:10:50 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

Ah yes, when all else fails, the kooks invariably haul out the
"projection noted" lame.

Do you really believe is kooks?

Huh? Alexa, you are above critical core temperature.

And do you really believe that Echelon is
operating in the national security interests of the citizens of United
States of America?

Which answer do you want?

If so, then why didn't Echelon prevent the 91 attacks on
the USA?

What 91 attacks?

Evasion noted.

Just answer the questions, inquiring minds want to know if you're really as
stupid as you appear.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:01:25 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:36:34 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[..]

Apparently you now infer that I advocate killing, snip

Do you work for any agency associated with Lockheed?

Apparently, according to your delusions, any and every corporation and
government entity is "associated with Lockheed". So the answer is yes.

So you admit you work for Lockheed, right?

If so, then you prefer killing -- and for profit.


You are insane.

I'm not insane, I don't advocate killing people for profit under the guise
of National Security when 'national security' is *supposed* to protect
people!.

And the NSA *deliberately* failed to protect the United States of America on
911.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:06:24 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:40:25 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

You claim you know all the answers, Ms. IQ 200, why are you asking
questions?

Why does that bother you?

It doesn't bother me,

Then why are you carrying on so, snookie? Trying to make an ass of yourself
again?

snip

An why do you refuse to answer the questions?

Because they are only fantasies dredged up from your
uberconspiracy-racked delusional mind.

What conspiracy? In order to prove conspiracy, you have to answer my
questions!

So answer the questions, baby cakes:

prediction: you won't, but will continue to evade then and attack the
messenger

Do you really believe is kooks? And do you really believe that Echelon is
operating in the national security interests of the citizens of United
States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon prevent the 91 attacks on
the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:08:59 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On 23 Apr 2004 17:17:03 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what * has to contribute...

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:21:32 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

[...]

It is a FACT -- you've proven it again and again.

That's why kook belief is faith based. It's a fanatical religion
for the brain dead.

Indeed, well said. This is why you are a kook.

Do you really believe is kooks? And do you really believe that
Echelon is operating in the national security interests of the
citizens of United States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon
prevent the 91 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for
illegal spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no
crime except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is
granted by the US Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of
America, or in Lockheed's best interests?

I think the answer to many of the questions is:
'You're a crazy, delusional bitch, Alexa.'

Nah, I think the answers to the questions are so obvious, that even a retard
could figure it out.

And of course, only retards try to hide an extraterrestrial saucer at Groom
Lake when thousands have seen it and every president and their cabinet since
1973 has seen it too.

And everyone knows 911 was an inside job.

Only if they are reptilian.

BTW -- I think you're a cinch to win the Angstrom Award.

Evasion noted. Just answer the questions instead of illogically attacking
me!

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:45:36 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:23:53 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

"The Saucer" at Groom Lake?

Yes, the one deliberately left on the runway at Holloman AFB in 1973
by the aliens, which is now buried at Groom Lake.

Where are all the others?

There is only one.

The Agency
absolutely knows there were more than one taken there.

All the US presidents and their cabinet members since 1973 know
differently.

If your saucer is buried in a lake, how is it that all your alleged
witnesses are routinely able to go see it?

The same way you see anything, with you eyes.

Thanks for clearing this up. Got any snaps of your saucer?

This sounds like reptilian disinformation.

snarf

As I suspected.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:12:14 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:47:45 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Why do you care about any of these questions?

Why won't you answer them, squirm worm?


Why do you keep trimming newsgroups, Alexa?

Why are you changing the subject?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Got any snaps of your saucer?

Yeppers.

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

And why do they claim ownership?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Got any snaps of your saucer?

Yeppers.

Who does the extraterrestrial saucer belong to?

And why do they claim ownership?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:18:21 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:




In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:01:25 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:36:34 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[..]

Apparently you now infer that I advocate killing, snip

Do you work for any agency associated with Lockheed?

Apparently, according to your delusions, any and every corporation and
government entity is "associated with Lockheed". So the answer is yes.

So you admit you work for Lockheed, right?

Read for comprehension please, Ms. IQ 200.

Just answer the question. You admit you work for Lockheed, right.


If so, then you prefer killing -- and for profit.


You are insane.

I'm not insane,

Your usenet history suggests otherwise.

And your false claim somehow makes the saucer at Groom Lake disappear,
right?

I don't advocate killing people for profit under the guise
of National Security when 'national security' is *supposed* to protect
people!.

And the NSA *deliberately* failed to protect the United States of America on
911.

How did you determine the truth of these "facts"?

How much money did Lockheed make from war?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:19:49 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:08:59 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On 23 Apr 2004 17:17:03 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what * has to contribute...

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:21:32 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

[...]

It is a FACT -- you've proven it again and again.

That's why kook belief is faith based. It's a fanatical religion
for the brain dead.

Indeed, well said. This is why you are a kook.

Do you really believe is kooks? And do you really believe that
Echelon is operating in the national security interests of the
citizens of United States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon
prevent the 91 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for
illegal spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no
crime except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is
granted by the US Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of
America, or in Lockheed's best interests?

I think the answer to many of the questions is:
'You're a crazy, delusional bitch, Alexa.'

Nah, I think the answers to the questions are so obvious, that even a
retard
could figure it out.

And of course, only retards try to hide an extraterrestrial saucer at Groom
Lake when thousands have seen it and every president and their cabinet
since
1973 has seen it too.

And everyone knows 911 was an inside job.

Only if they are reptilian.

BTW -- I think you're a cinch to win the Angstrom Award.

Evasion noted. Just answer the questions instead of illogically attacking
me!

I would recommend you start working on your acceptance speech, you will
need it.

And precisely how does that make the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake
disappear?