Lockheed: Perpetrated the 9-11 Attack on the USA Ping MHVW: VVF nomiation. Was Water: Free Energy

On 23 Apr 2004 17:17:03 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what * has to contribute...

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:21:32 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

[...]

It is a FACT -- you've proven it again and again.

That's why kook belief is faith based. It's a fanatical religion
for the brain dead.

Indeed, well said. This is why you are a kook.

Do you really believe is kooks? And do you really believe that
Echelon is operating in the national security interests of the
citizens of United States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon
prevent the 91 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for
illegal spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no
crime except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is
granted by the US Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of
America, or in Lockheed's best interests?

I think the answer to many of the questions is:
'You're a crazy, delusional bitch, Alexa.'

Nah, I think the answers to the questions are so obvious, that even a retard
could figure it out.

And of course, only retards try to hide an extraterrestrial saucer at Groom
Lake when thousands have seen it and every president and their cabinet since
1973 has seen it too.

And everyone knows 911 was an inside job.

On 23 Apr 2004 17:17:03 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

[...]

Nah, I think the answers to the questions are so obvious, that even a retard
could figure it out.

And of course, only retards try to hide an extraterrestrial saucer at Groom
Lake when thousands have seen it and every president and their cabinet since
1973 has seen it too.

And everyone knows 911 was an inside job.

On 23 Apr 2004 17:17:03 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what * has to contribute...

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:21:32 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

[...]

It is a FACT -- you've proven it again and again.

That's why kook belief is faith based. It's a fanatical religion
for the brain dead.

Indeed, well said. This is why you are a kook.

Do you really believe is kooks? And do you really believe that
Echelon is operating in the national security interests of the
citizens of United States of America? If so, then why didn't Echelon
prevent the 91 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for
illegal spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no
crime except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is
granted by the US Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of
America, or in Lockheed's best interests?

I think the answer to many of the questions is:
'You're a crazy, delusional bitch, Alexa.'

Nah, I think the answers to the questions are so obvious, that even a retard
could figure it out.

And of course, only retards try to hide an extraterrestrial saucer at Groom
Lake when thousands have seen it and every president and their cabinet since
1973 has seen it too.

And everyone knows 911 was an inside job.

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:23:53 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

"The Saucer" at Groom Lake?

Yes, the one deliberately left on the runway at Holloman AFB in 1973
by the aliens, which is now buried at Groom Lake.

Where are all the others?

There is only one.

The Agency
absolutely knows there were more than one taken there.

All the US presidents and their cabinet members since 1973 know differently.

If your saucer is buried in a lake, how is it that all your alleged
witnesses are routinely able to go see it?

This sounds like reptilian disinformation.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:40:25 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

You claim you know all the answers, Ms. IQ 200, why are you asking
questions?

Why does that bother you?

An why do you refuse to answer the questions?

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:17:43 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

Her world is circular, much like a merry-go-round.

Yeah it all revolves around Lockheed.

Caution, Alexa-screed du jour follows:

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

Why do you care about any of these questions?


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:45:36 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:23:53 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

"The Saucer" at Groom Lake?

Yes, the one deliberately left on the runway at Holloman AFB in 1973
by the aliens, which is now buried at Groom Lake.

Where are all the others?

There is only one.

The Agency
absolutely knows there were more than one taken there.

All the US presidents and their cabinet members since 1973 know differently.

If your saucer is buried in a lake, how is it that all your alleged
witnesses are routinely able to go see it?

The same way you see anything, with you eyes.

This sounds like reptilian disinformation.

snarf

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:10:50 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

[...]

Ah yes, when all else fails, the kooks invariably haul out the
"projection noted" lame.

Do you really believe is kooks?

Huh? Alexa, you are above critical core temperature.

And do you really believe that Echelon is
operating in the national security interests of the citizens of United
States of America?

Which answer do you want?

If so, then why didn't Echelon prevent the 91 attacks on
the USA?

What 91 attacks?


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On 23 Apr 2004 17:43:56 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote:

Let's find out what * has to contribute...

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:36:34 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

[..]

Apparently you now infer that I advocate killing, snip

Do you work for any agency associated with Lockheed?

If so, then you prefer killing -- and for profit.

You're a closet NeoCon, Alexa.

How many sock puppets do you have?

Isn't NeoCon just a buzz word for superimposing virtue on
killing?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:47:45 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

Why do you care about any of these questions?

Why won'r you answer them, squirm worm?