Poor NASA, no more rockets, so they latch onto global warming...

Whistleblower Outs NASA for Hiding Data of Global Cooling
Written by John O'Sullivan, guest post | June 20 2011

As Earth enters deepest solar minimum in centuries NASA caught hiding
sunspot data to prop up dying global warming cult. Inconvenient new
ice
age imminent.

A solar scientist insider who wishes to remain anonymous gives us the
scoop that government officials are falsifying solar data to suit a
political agenda. Below is his damning indictment of how deeply
entrenched and desperate is the climate fraud. We see how
observational
data is being deliberately faked to hide the decline in sunspot
activity; an event which independent scientists say could trigger a
new
ice age if it is prolonged.

The source, who fears losing his position if identified reveals, "The
fact is for years we have been watching the magnetic fields wane both
here on Earth and on the Sun."

But NASA has conspired with advocates of the man-made global warming
cult to 'hide the decline' which would make a mockery of their trumped
claims mankind has created a new and warmer Anthropocene Climatic
period.

Continued Rate of Cooling to Cause New Ice Age

Our nameless expert explains that since the 1990's and into the 21st
century magnetic fields have dropped by about 50 gauss per year. No
one
denies that in itself, this is not a remarkable drop if it were to be
soon reversed. However, if such a trend continues for a decade or more
then the fears of solar scientists that we are entering a new Ice Age
will be realized with potentially devastating consequences for life of
Earth.

The unidentified insider explains that one of the doomsayers guilty of
propping up the false global warming story and who has now been forced
into an embarrassing recant is NASA's solar physicist, David Hathaway.
Hathaway had claimed that Solar Cycle 24 would be strong but it
wasn't.
But like many scientists wedded to the doomsaying cult it was not
until
recently that Hathaway felt forced to drop the bar and suggest that
Solar Cycle 24 may be weak and not the 50 percent stronger he had
suggested in 2006.

Now Hathaway drops the bar further admitting that Solar Cycle 25 will
be
even weaker. So what does prolonged weak sunspot activity mean? Well,
look no further than the last long period of low sunspot activity when
the Earth suffered the misery of the Maunder Minimum and Little Ice
Age
and devastating episodes of famine and bad harvests swept Europe. The
climate became so cold that winter Frost Fairs were held on the thick
ice that formed over the River Thames in London, England.

With no rises in global temperatures since 1998 and global cooling
this
century, the wider scientific community is discovering that a clique
of
self-serving climatologists have deliberately misinterpreted data from
the Sun's Great Conveyor Belt.

more http://tinyurl.com/5s5zedb

On 6/21/11 12:30 PM, Rich wrote:
Whistleblower Outs NASA for Hiding Data of Global Cooling
Written by John O'Sullivan, guest post | June 20 2011

As Earth enters deepest solar minimum in centuries NASA caught hiding
sunspot data to prop up dying global warming cult. Inconvenient new
ice age imminent.


Last year tied for the warmest year on record. Jay Gulledge
summarizes key findings from NOAA.

See:
http://www.pewclimate.org/blog/gulle...medium=ema il

Every January, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center provides an expert
analysis of the previous year’s climate. This puts the extreme weather
of 2010 into a broader context. The record warmth of the past year adds
to the huge body of evidence that the earth continues to warm.

On Jun 21, 7:53*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 6/21/11 12:30 PM, Rich wrote:

Whistleblower Outs NASA for Hiding Data of Global Cooling
Written by John O'Sullivan, guest post | June 20 2011

As Earth enters deepest solar minimum in centuries NASA caught hiding
sunspot data to prop up dying global warming cult. Inconvenient new
ice age imminent.

Last year tied for the warmest year on record. Jay Gulledge
summarizes key findings from NOAA.

See:http://www.pewclimate.org/blog/gulle...est-year-recor....

Every January, NOAA s National Climatic Data Center provides an expert
analysis of the previous year s climate. This puts the extreme weather
of 2010 into a broader context. The record warmth of the past year adds
to the huge body of evidence that the earth continues to warm.

What I wouldn't give to find an individual who can affirm the cause of
the huge temperature fluctuations found in any temperature legend ! -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/weather/foreca...region=w orld

When you cannot affirm 1461 instances of temperature fluctuations for
any given location over 4 orbital circuits which condenses to 365 1/4
rotations per orbital circuit,it is then that people discover that the
problem is human nature.

It is only a matter of how long people choose to disgrace themselves
by believing 366 1/4 rotations per circuit which is tantamount to
denying the cause of temperature fluctuations.Doctorates indeed !,how
I wish you all were doctorates because what exists is malpractice on a
scale the world has not seen before.

In Sam Wormley
wrote:

Last year tied for the warmest year on record.

Which records go back all of 131 years.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

On 6/21/11 2:26 PM, Bert Hyman wrote:
In Sam Wormley
wrote:

Last year tied for the warmest year on record.

Which records go back all of 131 years.


The History of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Earth
http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html

"If present trends continue, Earth's climate will be very different 100
years from now. Nearly all of the world's scientists agree on this. The
only disagreement is about the amount and the rate of change.

"Climatology is a very complex subject and the preceding is only a
foretaste. An in depth report, written by 2,500 scientists from around
the world, is available if you want to know more. http://www.ipcc.ch/
The report was written by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

_____________________


Phanerozoic CO2

http://econstudentlog.files.wordpres...n_dioxide1.png

A Paleo Perspective on Global Warming Home Page
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globa...sitemapgw.html

Reconstruction of last 800,000 years based on analysis of trapped
air bubbles.
http://www.globalchange.gov/HighResI...obal-pg-13.jpg

Direct Measurements over the last 50 years
http://www.planetforlife.com/images/keeling2.gif

On Jun 21, 9:32*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 6/21/11 2:26 PM, Bert Hyman wrote:

am Wormley
*wrote:

Last year tied for the warmest year on record.

Which records go back all of 131 years.

* *The History of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Earth
* * *http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html

"If present trends continue, Earth's climate will be very different 100
years from now. Nearly all of the world's scientists agree on this. The
only disagreement is about the amount and the rate of change.

"Climatology is a very complex subject and the preceding is only a
foretaste. An in depth report, written by 2,500 scientists from around
the world, is available if you want to know more.http://www.ipcc.ch/
The report was written by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

* * * * _____________________

Phanerozoic CO2

http://econstudentlog.files.wordpres...rozoic_carbon_...

* *A Paleo Perspective on Global Warming Home Page
* * *http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globa...sitemapgw.html

Reconstruction of last 800,000 years based on analysis of trapped
air bubbles.
* *http://www.globalchange.gov/HighResI...obal-pg-13.jpg

Direct Measurements over the last 50 years
* *http://www.planetforlife.com/images/keeling2.gif

Put all the world's climate scientists in one room and ask them to
explain the cause of the daily temperature fluctuation with the record
stretching from Mar 1st to 4 orbital cycles later on Feb 29th and they
can't do it.The cause is the daily rotation of the Earth and it is a
tragedy that all the doctorates here disappear when faced with the
simple correspondence between cause and effect,the fact that daily and
orbital cycles are separate explains how the orbital cycle drifts
through Mar 1st each non-leap year to be picked up by an extra
rotation in terms of the calendar convenience.

Let them throw billions at the idea of human control over global
temperatures,it costs me $30 a month in internet charges to undo this
ideology born of criminal incompetence and scam artists.

Go ahead and extract the rotation of the Earth from a temperature
legend and pretend you are a doctorate or get taunted by others who
already know they live their lives out as a disgrace.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/weather/forecast/50?

In Sam Wormley
wrote:

On 6/21/11 2:26 PM, Bert Hyman wrote:
In Sam Wormley
wrote:

Last year tied for the warmest year on record.

Which records go back all of 131 years.


The History of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Earth
http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html
...

Do you think that the authors of the originally cited article were
unaware of this data, or do you think they had reasons for not using it?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

On 21 Jun 2011 22:21:48 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:

Do you think that the authors of the originally cited article were
unaware of this data, or do you think they had reasons for not using it?

Well, since the original article is found on a fringe science website
that seems to contain no actual science, and which provides no
evidence of their assertion that something was covered up (all the
data about sunspots and cooling has been available in papers for
years), I'd say that the authors don't care at all about the actual
data, and only publish distorted data as required by their handlers
(presumably one of the bogus think tanks that support all manner of
bogus science for political or economic reasons).

Because face it: the debate is completely over in the scientific
community. The fact that these flat-earthers pretend otherwise as a
tool for manipulating public opinion doesn't change that.

In Chris L Peterson
wrote:

(presumably one of the bogus think tanks that support all manner of
bogus science for political or economic reasons).

In today's society, is there any difference between political and
economic reasons?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

On 21 Jun 2011 23:40:02 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:

In today's society, is there any difference between political and
economic reasons?

Maybe not much. But they are clearly completely separate from actual
scientific analysis and understanding.