|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PERIMETER INSTITUTE MAY ALSO REFUTE EINSTEIN
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/Out...blic_Lectures/
"Perimeter Institute brings great thinkers from around the world to Canada to share their ideas on a wide variety of interesting and topical subjects....Alain Aspect: "From Einstein's Intuition to Quantum Bits" October 3, 2007 at 7:00 pm.......Alain Aspect is a leading figure with the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, France's National Center for Scientific Research) where he is Senior Scientist at Institut d'Optique and Professor at Ecole Poytechnique. Both institutions are on the same campus at Palaiseau. Among his many awards and honours, Prof. Aspect is recipient of the 2005 CNRS Gold Medal, the highest academic recognition in France, as well as a member of the Academie des Sciences and the Academie des Technologies." This great thinker Alain Aspect is able to refute Einstein because he is a member of the Academie des Sciences and also because his idiocies are greater than, imcompatible and even incommensurable with, Einstein's idiocies: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ein-never.html "The man who proved Einstein was wrong: Albert Einstein never 24 November 1990 NewScientist.com news service JOHN GRIBBIN.....After a further two decades, in the 1980s, experimenters in Paris, headed by Alain Aspect, were able to carry out an experiment along the lines proposed by Bell. The experiments showed that common sense and Einstein were wrong.....Hardly surprisingly, this result has been described by Brian Josephson, when at Cambridge University, as the most important recent advance in physics.....The only way to save quantum uncertainty in the context of the EPR 'thought experiment' is to allow what Einstein referred to as a 'spooky action at a distance', a communication that operates instantaneously between the two particles even when they are far apart, so that particle A can be disturbed by the measurement made on particle B - a communication that Einstein, the originator of relativity theory, could never accept, since it seemed to travel faster than light.....But just suppose that the world is super-deterministic, with not just inanimate nature running on behind-the-scences clockwork, but with our behaviour, including our belief that we are free to choose to do one experiment rather than another, absolutely predetermined. If everything is predetermined, including the 'decision' by the experimenter to carry out one set of measurements rather than another, the difficulty disappears. There is no need for a faster than light signal to tell particle A what measurement has been carried out on particle B, because the Universe, including particle A, already 'knows' what that measurement, and its outcome, will be." Alain Aspect may initially explain Einstein's initial intuition that misled him into believing that the speed of light obeys the field concept dealing with light in terms of continuous structures: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." Then Alain Aspect may find it suitable to explain Einstein's final intuition that contradicts Einstein's initial intuition: http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary physics." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
PERIMETER INSTITUTE MAY ALSO REFUTE EINSTEIN
Perhaps the Perimeter Institute (one of the subdivisions of the
Ministry of Silly Walks) wants to advance La Marche Futile - an extremely silly walk developed by l'Academie des Sciences, and the great thinker Alain Aspect will be the main protagonist. La Marche Futile is mentioned at the end of the following presentation of the Ministry of Silly Walks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
PERIMETER INSTITUTE MAY ALSO REFUTE EINSTEIN
On 12 Sept, 17:12, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Perhaps the Perimeter Institute (one of the subdivisions of the Ministry of Silly Walks) wants to advance La Marche Futile - an extremely silly walk developed by l'Academie des Sciences, and the great thinker Alain Aspect will be the main protagonist. La Marche Futile is mentioned at the end of the following presentation of the Ministry of Silly Walks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w Another subdivision of the Ministry of Silly Walks - the Royal Society - has undergone an interesting development: Twelve years ago (silly walkers still know no limits): http://www.totse.com/en/technology/s.../ftltravl.html : "ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL. It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone before. Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be able to travel faster than the speed of light. The breakthrough means that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar civilisations and voyages powered by warp drive are now no longer the exclusive domain of science fiction writers...Crawford argues that modern physics may allow two possible ways around Einstein's theory....The theories will boost growing interest among scientists in the possibility of travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members include several NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in Halifax, Nova Scotia." Six years ago (concern is growing in the Ministry of Silly Walks): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/519406/posts : "A GROUP of astronomers and cosmologists has warned that the laws thought to govern the universe, including Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, must be rewritten. The group, which includes Professor Stephen Hawking and Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal, say such laws may only work for our universe but not in others that are now also thought to exist.....AMONG THE IDEAS FACING REVISION IS EINSTEIN'S BELIEF THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT MUST ALWAYS BE THE SAME - 186,000 miles a second in a vacuum.....Rees, Hawking and others are so concerned at the impact of such ideas that they recently organised a private conference in Cambridge for more than 30 leading cosmologists." Now the Ministry of Silly Walks is silent. Silly walkers feel that something awful has happened: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/ingdahl2.html "But there has been a marked global decrease of students willing to study physics, and funding has decreased accordingly. Not only that, the best students are not heading for studies in physics, finding other fields more appealing, and science teachers to schools are getting scarcer in supply. In fact, warning voices are being heard about the spread of a "scientific illiteracy" where many living in technologically advanced societies lack the knowledge and the ability for critical thinking in order to function in their daily environment." http://education.guardian.co.uk/scho...648111,00.html "We are nearing the end of the "World Year of Physics", otherwise known as Einstein Year, as it is the centenary of his annus mirabilis in which he made three incredible breakthroughs, including special relativity. In fact, it was 100 years ago yesterday that he published the most famous equation in the history of physics: E=mc2. But instead of celebrating, physicists are in mourning after a report showed a dramatic decline in the number of pupils studying physics at school. The number taking A-level physics has dropped by 38% over the past 15 years, a catastrophic meltdown that is set to continue over the next few years. The report warns that a shortage of physics teachers and a lack of interest from pupils could mean the end of physics in state schools. Thereafter, physics would be restricted to only those students who could afford to go to posh schools. Britain was the home of Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and Paul Dirac, and Brits made world- class contributions to understanding gravity, quantum physics and electromagnetism - and yet the British physicist is now facing extinction. But so what? Physicists are not as cuddly as pandas, so who cares if we disappear?" Pentcho Valev |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
PERIMETER INSTITUTE MAY ALSO REFUTE EINSTEIN
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message ups.com... On 12 Sept, 17:12, Pentcho Valev wrote: Perhaps the Perimeter Institute (one of the subdivisions of the Ministry of Silly Walks) wants to advance La Marche Futile - an extremely silly walk developed by l'Academie des Sciences, and the great thinker Alain Aspect will be the main protagonist. La Marche Futile is mentioned at the end of the following presentation of the Ministry of Silly Walks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w Another subdivision of the Ministry of Silly Walks - the Royal Society - has undergone an interesting development: Twelve years ago (silly walkers still know no limits): http://www.totse.com/en/technology/s.../ftltravl.html : "ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL. It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone before. Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be able to travel faster than the speed of light. The breakthrough means that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar civilisations and voyages powered by warp drive are now no longer the exclusive domain of science fiction writers...Crawford argues that modern physics may allow two possible ways around Einstein's theory....The theories will boost growing interest among scientists in the possibility of travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members include several NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in Halifax, Nova Scotia." Six years ago (concern is growing in the Ministry of Silly Walks): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/519406/posts : "A GROUP of astronomers and cosmologists has warned that the laws thought to govern the universe, including Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, must be rewritten. The group, which includes Professor Stephen Hawking and Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal, say such laws may only work for our universe but not in others that are now also thought to exist.....AMONG THE IDEAS FACING REVISION IS EINSTEIN'S BELIEF THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT MUST ALWAYS BE THE SAME - 186,000 miles a second in a vacuum.....Rees, Hawking and others are so concerned at the impact of such ideas that they recently organised a private conference in Cambridge for more than 30 leading cosmologists." Now the Ministry of Silly Walks is silent. Silly walkers feel that something awful has happened: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/ingdahl2.html "But there has been a marked global decrease of students willing to study physics, and funding has decreased accordingly. Not only that, the best students are not heading for studies in physics, finding other fields more appealing, and science teachers to schools are getting scarcer in supply. In fact, warning voices are being heard about the spread of a "scientific illiteracy" where many living in technologically advanced societies lack the knowledge and the ability for critical thinking in order to function in their daily environment." http://education.guardian.co.uk/scho...648111,00.html "We are nearing the end of the "World Year of Physics", otherwise known as Einstein Year, as it is the centenary of his annus mirabilis in which he made three incredible breakthroughs, including special relativity. In fact, it was 100 years ago yesterday that he published the most famous equation in the history of physics: E=mc2. But instead of celebrating, physicists are in mourning after a report showed a dramatic decline in the number of pupils studying physics at school. The number taking A-level physics has dropped by 38% over the past 15 years, a catastrophic meltdown that is set to continue over the next few years. The report warns that a shortage of physics teachers and a lack of interest from pupils could mean the end of physics in state schools. Thereafter, physics would be restricted to only those students who could afford to go to posh schools. Britain was the home of Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and Paul Dirac, and Brits made world- class contributions to understanding gravity, quantum physics and electromagnetism - and yet the British physicist is now facing extinction. But so what? Physicists are not as cuddly as pandas, so who cares if we disappear?" Pentcho Valev You are still an idiot. You deal horizontally broad and levels deep in multiple coordinate systems!, fool. The universal result regarding light will always be the constant of c, the speed of light in [vacuo]!, stupid. As an infinity of crossing beams of light, an infinity of crossing [histories] will always be there at any and all points omni-directionally in space PREVIOUS (-) to any and all space travelers. Space travelers will always be spatial submarines traveling (+) in an external ocean of time (-). Light itself will always travel, expand, out from specific EVENTS, always acquiring more general EVENTUALITY, rear end of time forward in space, front end of time backward in space. Just where in hell -- in what direction of time -- do you think the space traveler is going to go?! And last but not least, no space navigator in his right mind is ever going to point his vessel into the light point of his destination. He would know his destination (0) wasn't there (-). He would point his vessel into the vacuum in-line plus (+) to his destination (0) and make the point of light (-) speed up in time toward a rendevous point with him. Or better yet, he get there to the rendevous first by as small a margin as possible. A dynamic light ocean of ever changing -- advancing ahead (+) and receding behind (-) -- external coordinate histories (-) would always observably tell him he was never surpassing the speed of light himself. Never getting any closer to the speed of light than before he began his voyage. That is the physic, and the benefit to him, of the ocean of light time histories (-) always being there -- always being there PREVIOUS to him -- for him. Why don't you pull out a dictionary and look up the meaning of "previous"! (The speed of light in vacuo, c, will always be "infinitely faster than any velocity." -- Albert Einstein. I don't think you'll ever catch on as to why it is, and always will be, that way.) GLB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
PERIMETER INSTITUTE MAY ALSO REFUTE EINSTEIN
On 16 Sep, 18:50, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 12 Sept, 17:12, Pentcho Valev wrote: Perhaps the Perimeter Institute (one of the subdivisions of the Ministry of Silly Walks) wants to advance La Marche Futile - an extremely silly walk developed by l'Academie des Sciences, and the great thinker Alain Aspect will be the main protagonist. La Marche Futile is mentioned at the end of the following presentation of the Ministry of Silly Walks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w Another subdivision of the Ministry of Silly Walks - the Royal Society - has undergone an interesting development: Twelve years ago (silly walkers still know no limits): http://www.totse.com/en/technology/s.../ftltravl.html : "ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL. It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone before. Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be able to travel faster than the speed of light. The breakthrough means that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar civilisations and voyages powered by warp drive are now no longer the exclusive domain of science fiction writers...Crawford argues that modern physics may allow two possible ways around Einstein's theory....The theories will boost growing interest among scientists in the possibility of travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members include several NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in Halifax, Nova Scotia." Six years ago (concern is growing in the Ministry of Silly Walks): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/519406/posts: "A GROUP of astronomers and cosmologists has warned that the laws thought to govern the universe, including Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, must be rewritten. The group, which includes Professor Stephen Hawking and Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal, say such laws may only work for our universe but not in others that are now also thought to exist.....AMONG THE IDEAS FACING REVISION IS EINSTEIN'S BELIEF THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT MUST ALWAYS BE THE SAME - 186,000 miles a second in a vacuum.....Rees, Hawking and others are so concerned at the impact of such ideas that they recently organised a private conference in Cambridge for more than 30 leading cosmologists." Now the Ministry of Silly Walks is silent. Silly walkers feel that something awful has happened: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/ingdahl2.html "But there has been a marked global decrease of students willing to study physics, and funding has decreased accordingly. Not only that, the best students are not heading for studies in physics, finding other fields more appealing, and science teachers to schools are getting scarcer in supply. In fact, warning voices are being heard about the spread of a "scientific illiteracy" where many living in technologically advanced societies lack the knowledge and the ability for critical thinking in order to function in their daily environment." http://education.guardian.co.uk/scho...648111,00.html "We are nearing the end of the "World Year of Physics", otherwise known as Einstein Year, as it is the centenary of his annus mirabilis in which he made three incredible breakthroughs, including special relativity. In fact, it was 100 years ago yesterday that he published the most famous equation in the history of physics: E=mc2. But instead of celebrating, physicists are in mourning after a report showed a dramatic decline in the number of pupils studying physics at school. The number taking A-level physics has dropped by 38% over the past 15 years, a catastrophic meltdown that is set to continue over the next few years. The report warns that a shortage of physics teachers and a lack of interest from pupils could mean the end of physics in state schools. Thereafter, physics would be restricted to only those students who could afford to go to posh schools. Britain was the home of Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and Paul Dirac, and Brits made world- class contributions to understanding gravity, quantum physics and electromagnetism - and yet the British physicist is now facing extinction. But so what? Physicists are not as cuddly as pandas, so who cares if we disappear?" Something is going on in the Perimeter Institute - some crazy desperate panic or even worse: http://maisonneuve.org/index.php?&pa...rticle_id=2934 CRISES + PARADOX = REVOLUTION. WELCOME TO THE PERIMETER INSTITUTE WHERE TODAY'S EINSTEINS ARE HARD AT WORK. So today's Einsteins are hard at work, but what will today's Einsteins discover in the end? Today's Einsteins have already hinted at tomorrow's new breathtaking discovery: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smol...n03_print.html Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin, and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is observed?" Pentcho Valev |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
PERIMETER INSTITUTE MAY ALSO REFUTE EINSTEIN
On 25 Sep, 08:50, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Something is going on in the Perimeter Institute - some crazy desperate panic or even worse: http://maisonneuve.org/index.php?&pa...rticle_id=2934 CRISES + PARADOX = REVOLUTION. WELCOME TO THE PERIMETER INSTITUTE WHERE TODAY'S EINSTEINS ARE HARD AT WORK. So today's Einsteins are hard at work, but what will today's Einsteins discover in the end? Today's Einsteins have already hinted at tomorrow's new breathtaking discovery: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smol...n03_print.html Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin, and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is observed?" Six years ago the Royal Society felt the same crazy desperate panic. They also hinted at new breathtaking discoveries: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/519406/posts "A GROUP of astronomers and cosmologists has warned that the laws thought to govern the universe, including Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, must be rewritten. The group, which includes Professor Stephen Hawking and Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal, say such laws may only work for our universe but not in others that are now also thought to exist. "It is becoming increasingly likely that the rules we had thought were fundamental through time and space are actually just bylaws for our bit of it," said Rees, whose new book, Our Cosmic Habitat, is published next month. "Creation is emerging as even stranger than we thought." Among the ideas facing revision is Einstein's belief that the speed of light must always be the same - 186,000 miles a second in a vacuum....Another puzzle is the so-called "smoothness" of our universe, by which astronomers mean the distribution of matter and radiation." Then the Royal Society suddenly realized where the introduction of non- constancy of the speed of light, of non-smoothness of radiation etc. would lead to: http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary physics." Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DID AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS REFUTE EINSTEIN? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 28 | October 31st 07 03:45 AM |
A RACE TO REFUTE RELATIVITY IN EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 23rd 07 05:35 PM |
A RACE TO REFUTE RELATIVITY IN EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Androcles[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 23rd 07 01:56 PM |
A RACE TO REFUTE RELATIVITY IN EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | G. L. Bradford | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 23rd 07 11:40 AM |
Rebut vs. refute | Jonathan Silverlight | UK Astronomy | 14 | June 8th 04 11:43 AM |