|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Space Race was about Power Projection - Miles O'Brien
On 12/15/2016 10:03 AM, Stuf4 wrote:
From David Spain: On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 6:31:27 AM UTC-5, Stuf4 wrote: Nuclear ICBMs are the only fielded weapon that has NEVER undergone an end-to-end test. Well technically for a "ballistic missile" that is correct. However historically for a non-ballistic missile or non-ballistic rocket, of intermediate range (Thor) not true. I specifically stated INTER-CONTINENTAL ballistic missiles, and you come back with (paraphrase) "That's not true, there were cases of INTERMEDIATE RANGE..." Hello? I was operating under the assumption that we were speaking the same language. Maybe I should try putting your reply into Google Translate. Please don't paraphrase when the exact wording is available to you. I said "technically for a "ballistic missile"" and left unsaid "of INTER-CONTINENTAL range" since that was what you were describing and I said you were correct. No disagreement. I did NOT say "That's not true.... blah", I said "However..." and described a different scenario where that was not the case. Please don't put words in my mouth I did not use. I would not think translation would be necessary. Prior to the 1963 Limited Nuclear Test Ban treaty there were a few documented tests of nuclear devices detonated in space via rocket by the USAF & Los Alamos in the early 1960's. See the "Starfish Prime" test series: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime Yes, I remember my surprise decades ago when I first learned about those tests. Good we are in agreement then. On 12/12/2016 10:00 PM, Scott M. Kozel wrote: How would any other country know that it had a nuclear warhead when it was launched? Point taken. There may be historical record of test objects launched as prototype nuclear warheads that had the mass/design-shape needed for missilery but without the required nuclear material. I can't document that fact just now, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. In fact I'm certain it did, quite a bit... I do not know the exact protocol, but I would expect that countries be required to register (perhaps with the UN?) any plan to launch any missile or rocket that had the range of impacting other countries. Or maybe this guess is mistaken, and that instead there is a long tradition of countries unilaterally doing whatever they want. No notice at all. Your guess is mistaken. And the later is true. A country may, as a courtesy, inform other countries of a test, but when a test does not involve their airspace there is no requirement. BTW a country is free to orbit anything in space regardless of what territory it crosses. When North Korea does this we can rant, fume, bloviate all we want but they are not doing anything any other country or private corporation has not already done. It seems to me that a spotlight has been shined on a deficient area of space history. One that I myself cannot recall reading about: How can something like even the Space Shuttle be launched without a country on the other side of the planet not be terrified that the US just launched a nuclear warhead at them? Countries capable of a response also have national means to identify whether a rocket trajectory is on a path that would allow something to fall on their territory or not. The space shuttle would obviously not qualify as an attack due to its trajectory. And even if subject to a catastrophic failure it would instead present a debris field that would obviously not qualify as an attack to anyone experienced in the field of missile detection. Countries without the means of detecting such probably don't have the means to retaliate either and therefore would not be considered a threat and unlikely to be targeted in the first place. If a surprise attack was intended, it would be very easy to roll video tape of astronauts being strapped into the cabin while in fact warhead were there. It would a particularly unusual method of attack. One that would leave the perpetrator susceptible to a counter-attack unless other strategic forces were engaged at the same time. And if not attacking an enemy capable of retaliation why all the subterfuge? Also it's pretty hard to disguise the aftermath of a nuclear explosion. There was even a Star Trek episode from 1967ish that showed the Saturn V as launching a bunch of nuclear warheads at the Soviet Union. OK I'll concede that this is space history only in the sense that it involves a Science Fiction TV show episode about space explorers that aired in the 1960s... And you are not quite recalling that episode correctly... :-) The rocket was launching an orbiting nuclear warhead platform not "launching a bunch of nuclear warheads at the Soviet Union". The TV series was Star Trek and the name of that episode was "Assignment: Earth" It guest starred Robert Lansing as "Gary Seven" and Teri Garr as his assistant "Roberta Lincoln". http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Gary_Seven Have any space historians, the folks who do this as a profession, ever mentioned this a single time? Again, if so, I haven't seen it. Mentioned what? Countries launching stuff into space unilaterally? Using astronauts to disguise a secret attack? Or the Start Trek episode? Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Miles O'Brien has arm amputated after accident | Jeff Findley[_4_] | Policy | 2 | February 26th 14 11:19 PM |
CNN's Miles O'Brien was oh-so-close to being the first U.S. newsmanin space. | Terrell Miller | History | 0 | May 28th 05 06:05 PM |
CNN's Miles O'Brien was oh-so-close to being the first U.S. newsmanin space. | Terrell Miller | Policy | 0 | May 28th 05 06:05 PM |
CNN's Miles O'Brien was oh-so-close to being the first U.S. newsmanin space. | Terrell Miller | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 28th 05 06:05 PM |
Miles O'Brien (of CNN) is soooo suave | AldoNova | History | 1 | January 5th 04 07:01 AM |