|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
August 29th 09, 01:53 PM
posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history
|
|||
|
|||
If no Moon, why Constellation? Why not continuous shuttle investment?
Derek Lyons wrote:
Not to mention that Russian track record of following up on such brave plans is precisely 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. You may laugh now capitalist stooge, but Phobos-Grunt is on the way. (God, but I just love saying "Phobos-Grunt".)  Pat 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If no Moon, why Constellation? Why not continuous shuttle investment? | David Spain | Policy | 167 | September 7th 09 05:18 PM |
| If no Moon, why Constellation? Why not continuous shuttle investment? | Pat Flannery | Space Shuttle | 1 | September 1st 09 06:18 PM |
Linear Mode
