|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Tom McDonald the queerboy talking monkey related to Darwin wrote: Mad Scientist wrote: Wally Dumbasssea wrote: "Mad Scientist" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Remember anything that moves in the heavens is either a manmade satellite or mistaken flock of birds or even bad eyesight mistaking Venus for a UFO What do you know, you *can* learn. Only 5 minutes ago I told you that flocks of birds and Venus get mistaken for UFO's and here you are remembering what I told you. Rememeber how I taught you to use the word blowhard, too? I am not into queerboy sex like you and your imbecile queerboy friends. MS, Really? I must say I'm disappointed. You sound like a real tight ass. We could have made such special man-love. Ah, well. It's a disappointment I'll recover from, in time. Don't cry queerboy, not everyone is into screwing the ******** like you queerboys. :-) Tom McDonald according to dumbass astronomers. Aww, poor kook. Hates his reality bubble being pricked by his betters. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What UFOs? I've been looking at the sky since I was 8 and haven't
seen any. Most astronomers have never seen one. They sure wouldn't mistake Venus or an Iridium flare for a UFO like all the nut jobs have. Let's face the fact that their aren't any aliens near Earth sent here to observe us or, horrors!, save us from ourselves! Saul Levy On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 23:06:56 GMT, Mad Scientist wrote: steve sawyer wrote: Last night (Aug 8) at about 11:30 PST I saw a very unusual thing appearing to be either crusing by or coming out of an area of space close to the constellation of Casseopia. It had the flight characteristics of an orbiting spacecraft except it became exceptionally bright, something similar to a aircraft's landing lights as seen from approximately half a mile. This lasted for approximately 5 seconds after which the light diminished in its intensity. Then the object once again took on the appearance of a conventional satellite and was visible for about another 5 seconds before disappearing from view. The intensity of the light was much much more then the typical shimmering you see when observing spinning satellites as they reflect sunlight. Did anybody witness this, or can anybody offer any possible explanations? Steve Don't bother asking astronomers for help in understanding UFO's. They haven't a clue. They always answer that UFO's are either satellites, meteors, or mistaken airplanes. They *never* say that UFO's exist. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Mad Scientist" wrote in message et.cable.rogers.com... snip Don't bother asking astronomers for help in understanding UFO's. They haven't a clue. They always answer that UFO's are either satellites, meteors, or mistaken airplanes. They *never* say that UFO's exist. snip The above may be true, but based on the OP's description, an Iridium Flare is a very likely answer, as the OP's description accurately describes such a flare. It is however possible that the OP saw the Higher Intelligence flying overhead looking to drop off my aluminum foil with which you can wrap your head. BV. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:22:37 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote:
Remember anything that moves in the heavens is either a manmade satellite or mistaken flock of birds or even bad eyesight mistaking Venus for a UFO according to dumbass astronomers. The astronomers are correct actually. Of coarse the "alien visitors" crowd can offer absolutely no proof what so ever that we are being visited. Not one tangible piece of evidence. Frustrates the hell out of them. Sends them into a tizzy, it's quite entertaining. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Randy wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:22:37 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote: Remember anything that moves in the heavens is either a manmade satellite or mistaken flock of birds or even bad eyesight mistaking Venus for a UFO according to dumbass astronomers. The astronomers are correct actually. Of coarse the "alien visitors" crowd can offer absolutely no proof what so ever that we are being visited. Not one tangible piece of evidence. You just proved how little research you actually do on the topic of UFO's. plonk Frustrates the hell out of them. Sends them into a tizzy, it's quite entertaining. Hardly. You only succeeded in demonstrating how stupid you actually are. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Saul Levy wrote: What UFOs? I've been looking at the sky since I was 8 and haven't seen any. Most astronomers have never seen one. They sure wouldn't mistake Venus or an Iridium flare for a UFO like all the nut jobs have. Let's face the fact that their aren't any aliens near Earth sent here to observe us or, horrors!, save us from ourselves! I am not sure who is the biggest loser on this newsgroup, you or...... Saul Levy On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 23:06:56 GMT, Mad Scientist wrote: steve sawyer wrote: Last night (Aug 8) at about 11:30 PST I saw a very unusual thing appearing to be either crusing by or coming out of an area of space close to the constellation of Casseopia. It had the flight characteristics of an orbiting spacecraft except it became exceptionally bright, something similar to a aircraft's landing lights as seen from approximately half a mile. This lasted for approximately 5 seconds after which the light diminished in its intensity. Then the object once again took on the appearance of a conventional satellite and was visible for about another 5 seconds before disappearing from view. The intensity of the light was much much more then the typical shimmering you see when observing spinning satellites as they reflect sunlight. Did anybody witness this, or can anybody offer any possible explanations? Steve Don't bother asking astronomers for help in understanding UFO's. They haven't a clue. They always answer that UFO's are either satellites, meteors, or mistaken airplanes. They *never* say that UFO's exist. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Another response amounting to a big fat zero.
Benign Vanilla wrote: "Mad Scientist" wrote in message et.cable.rogers.com... snip Don't bother asking astronomers for help in understanding UFO's. They haven't a clue. They always answer that UFO's are either satellites, meteors, or mistaken airplanes. They *never* say that UFO's exist. snip The above may be true, but based on the OP's description, an Iridium Flare is a very likely answer, as the OP's description accurately describes such a flare. It is however possible that the OP saw the Higher Intelligence flying overhead looking to drop off my aluminum foil with which you can wrap your head. BV. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Mad Scientist" wrote in message .cable.rogers.com... Tom Randy wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:22:37 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote: Remember anything that moves in the heavens is either a manmade satellite or mistaken flock of birds or even bad eyesight mistaking Venus for a UFO according to dumbass astronomers. The astronomers are correct actually. Of coarse the "alien visitors" crowd can offer absolutely no proof what so ever that we are being visited. Not one tangible piece of evidence. You just proved how little research you actually do on the topic of UFO's. plonk Truth hurts your ears, doesn't it, kook? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Psychopath
Wally Anglesea wrote: "Mad Scientist" wrote in message .cable.rogers.com... Tom Randy wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:22:37 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote: Remember anything that moves in the heavens is either a manmade satellite or mistaken flock of birds or even bad eyesight mistaking Venus for a UFO according to dumbass astronomers. The astronomers are correct actually. Of coarse the "alien visitors" crowd can offer absolutely no proof what so ever that we are being visited. Not one tangible piece of evidence. You just proved how little research you actually do on the topic of UFO's. plonk Truth hurts your ears, doesn't it, kook? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, Mad, we KNOW who's the biggest loser here.
Saul Levy On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:02:15 GMT, Mad Scientist wrote: Saul Levy wrote: What UFOs? I've been looking at the sky since I was 8 and haven't seen any. Most astronomers have never seen one. They sure wouldn't mistake Venus or an Iridium flare for a UFO like all the nut jobs have. Let's face the fact that their aren't any aliens near Earth sent here to observe us or, horrors!, save us from ourselves! I am not sure who is the biggest loser on this newsgroup, you or...... Saul Levy On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 23:06:56 GMT, Mad Scientist wrote: steve sawyer wrote: Last night (Aug 8) at about 11:30 PST I saw a very unusual thing appearing to be either crusing by or coming out of an area of space close to the constellation of Casseopia. It had the flight characteristics of an orbiting spacecraft except it became exceptionally bright, something similar to a aircraft's landing lights as seen from approximately half a mile. This lasted for approximately 5 seconds after which the light diminished in its intensity. Then the object once again took on the appearance of a conventional satellite and was visible for about another 5 seconds before disappearing from view. The intensity of the light was much much more then the typical shimmering you see when observing spinning satellites as they reflect sunlight. Did anybody witness this, or can anybody offer any possible explanations? Steve Don't bother asking astronomers for help in understanding UFO's. They haven't a clue. They always answer that UFO's are either satellites, meteors, or mistaken airplanes. They *never* say that UFO's exist. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
*** Hilal (Crescent Moon) Sighting: Eve Thu//Fri 17/18 Jun 2004 (late) *** | Chris L Peterson | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 23rd 04 07:08 AM |
Another explanation of the martian "spiders". | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 13th 04 11:17 AM |
Need Simple Foucault Pendulum Explanation | Dennis Woos | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | March 11th 04 06:18 AM |
Another biological explanation of the Mars spherules. | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 5 | March 5th 04 04:13 PM |
Another biological explanation of the Mars spherules. | Robert Clark | Misc | 5 | March 5th 04 04:13 PM |