Time Travel

Can you prove me wrong. g

LJ

Like assholes like you would know anything about time travel or space
travel for that matter. Sheesh, even the net.kooks have an opinion.

Paul Lawler wrote:

"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...

Just wondering what people think about it.


Into the future, yes.

Into the past, no.

Lloyd Jones wrote:

All of your replies is interesting.

I think that in the future ( most probably in many thousands of years, if
not longer) If we humans are still around, we will some how find a way to
time travel. If anyone says it's impossible they are either naive or narrow
minded.

Or just plain stupid.



If we do find a way of doing it, the world in my opinion would be 1000x
times more dangerous than it is now.

LJ

Don't expect this subject to be seriously debated in here.
Alt.astronomy proves itself to be nothing but a kook newsgroup.

Lloyd Jones wrote:

Half of the greatest scientist in the world are debating whether it's
possible or not, you can't say it's defiantly not or ever possible.

LJ

Are you the pot or the kettle?

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
Don't expect this subject to be seriously debated in here.
Alt.astronomy proves itself to be nothing but a kook newsgroup.

Lloyd Jones wrote:

Half of the greatest scientist in the world are debating whether it's
possible or not, you can't say it's defiantly not or ever possible.

LJ

What the **** are you? Another alt.astronomy kook with nothing better
to do obviously.

Algomeysa2 wrote:

Are you the pot or the kettle?

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...

Don't expect this subject to be seriously debated in here.
Alt.astronomy proves itself to be nothing but a kook newsgroup.

Lloyd Jones wrote:


Half of the greatest scientist in the world are debating whether it's
possible or not, you can't say it's defiantly not or ever possible.

LJ

In message .net,
Algomeysa2 writes
Lloyd Jones wrote:

Half of the greatest scientist in the world are debating whether it's
possible or not, you can't say it's defiantly not or ever possible.

LJ



"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...
Don't expect this subject to be seriously debated in here.
Alt.astronomy proves itself to be nothing but a kook newsgroup.

Are you the pot or the kettle?


He's the bad penny that always turns up.
Currently, he's infecting every thread on alt.astronomy and elsewhere.

Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

In message .net,
Algomeysa2 writes

Lloyd Jones wrote:

Half of the greatest scientist in the world are debating whether it's
possible or not, you can't say it's defiantly not or ever possible.

LJ



"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...

Don't expect this subject to be seriously debated in here.
Alt.astronomy proves itself to be nothing but a kook newsgroup.


Are you the pot or the kettle?


He's the bad penny that always turns up.
Currently, he's infecting every thread on alt.astronomy and elsewhere.

And elsewhere? What the **** is it to you asshole or should that be
fascist pig.

"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...
Can you prove me wrong. g

Quite handily. Aside from the paradox (where you killed your father,
remember?), no one has ever built a time machine or demonstrated that
time travel (into the past) is possible. Now if you have evidence to the
contrary... g

Paul, I think you have some issues with your father.

LJ