A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Space Station to be Abandoned?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd 04, 04:09 AM
bob haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Space Station to be Abandoned?


Space station may fall into disrepair
Michael Hopkin

Failure to fix oxygen unit could leave orbiting lab crewless.


YEAH! Lets dump that poor excuse for a station and ground the shuttles too
before they ill another crew!!!!
HAVE A GREAT DAY!
  #2  
Old September 22nd 04, 06:11 AM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Agamemnon wrote:
October. If the
generator is not reliably repaired by then, space officials may
decide
against sending up a fresh crew because there would be no
guarantee of
enough oxygen to last their stay.


What a bunch of crock. The logical solution is to send the crew up and have
them thinker with Elektron until they run out of O2 and the use Soyuz to come
back down.

Again, Progress provides O2, so do Oxygen Candles, adn there is plenty of O2
available for release from the US segment's Quest tanks. And based on a Jim
Oberg document, it seems that Elektron only needs to operate one hour in full
mode to provide suffficient oxygen to support one adult male for one day, so
it needs to run for essentially 2 hours per day.
  #3  
Old September 22nd 04, 03:43 PM
Jeff Findley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"bob haller" wrote in message
...

Space station may fall into disrepair
Michael Hopkin

Failure to fix oxygen unit could leave orbiting lab crewless.


YEAH! Lets dump that poor excuse for a station and ground the shuttles too
before they ill another crew!!!!


This assumes that Russia will "roll over" and give up. I very much doubt
that. Not only do they have Elektron currently running, but will surely
continue to troubleshoot problems as they develop (and they will).
Furthermore, Progress can bring up gaseous O2 in addition to O2 candles and
spare parts for Elektron.

Unfortunately, none of the other international partners are in a position to
help with ISS resupply at this time. That's the real problem with ISS, the
fact that the shuttle is grounded and can't provide any ISS resupply.

Furthermore, ESA and Japan are a bit slow (in terms of the ISS program) in
getting their resupply ships operational. It clearly would have been
beneficial to have thier ships flying by now as a backup to any Shuttle or
Progress failure.

Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.



  #4  
Old September 23rd 04, 04:32 PM
Jim Kingdon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Furthermore, ESA and Japan are a bit slow (in terms of the ISS
program) in getting their resupply ships operational. It clearly
would have been beneficial to have thier ships flying by now as a
backup to any Shuttle or Progress failure.


This article:

http://www.space.com/spacenews/busin...ay_040419.html

just talks about technical and procurement problems. But wasn't there
also something about the agreements between the partners? That ESA
wasn't obligated to provide ATV until Columbus was launched, and
therefore they delayed the Columbus launch. Or something like that?
(This is kind of a dim memory, so I'm not sure whether it has any
bearing on when ATV will start flying, or how often ATV will fly).
  #5  
Old September 23rd 04, 09:59 PM
Andrey Tarasevich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

bob haller wrote:

Space station may fall into disrepair
Michael Hopkin

Failure to fix oxygen unit could leave orbiting lab crewless.


YEAH! Lets dump that poor excuse for a station and ground the shuttles too
before they ill another crew!!!!
HAVE A GREAT DAY!


You missed the entire point of the article. It was written with the only
purpose to re-iterate that the problematic generator was _russian_
built. The rest is just bunch of largely meaningless sentences added for
volume. The US has resumed its internal BS campaign intended to prepare
the pull out of ISS program, blaming everything on the "international
partners", and this article is nothing else than a small part of this
campaign. I won't be surprised if this "Michael Hopkin" in reality this
is the same person (or group of persons) who's responsible for producing
the recent stream of BS in "Florida Today" and other similar nonsense.

--
Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Moon key to space future? James White Policy 90 January 6th 04 04:29 PM
Special Recipes Give Space Station Crew A Tast of Home Ron Baalke Space Station 0 November 25th 03 01:02 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM
Milestone Marked In Space - 1,000 Days Of Human Presence On Station Ron Baalke Space Station 3 August 2nd 03 05:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.