|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is there water on the Moon, or isn't there?
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... Be so kind as to show me the properly enlarged image that you're using. I've come to a very strongly held conclusion that viewing images of other planets is the ultimate of all Rorschach tests! And I'm starting to come to the conclusion that our perception of reality is as important or more than reality itself. . ~ BG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is there water on the Moon, or isn't there?
On Jun 19, 6:26*pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... Be so kind as to show me the properly enlarged image that you're using. I've come to a very strongly held conclusion that viewing images of other planets is the ultimate of all Rorschach tests! And I'm starting to come to the conclusion that our perception of reality is as important or more than reality itself. . ~ BG In other words, you couldn't even be bothered with using a free download of PhotoZoom, much less to actually resample/enlarge the area of that image that I've specified. How is it that you are such a photographic expert, especially when you can't even accomplish the most fundamental basics of digital image processing? btw; You do realize that moon water/ice is just another ruse. LRO; Apollo impacts and their debris soon to be identified (at least that’s the plan). Our spendy LRO is up, up and away. Finally, there’s absolutely no excuse whatsoever for not detecting each and every significant Apollo item that’s bright and shiny while situated upon such a naked surface that’s crystal dry, electrostatic charged, generally reactive and nearly dark as coal. The undisclosed dynamic range of their primary imager should knock our socks off, whereas even earthshine illumination should be entirely sufficient, as well as whatever desired color/hue saturation at less resolution shouldn’t be a problem unless they intentionally assign false colors. At the altitude of 50 km (30–70 km polar orbit) it should offer 0.5 meter resolution. Better resolution that’s technically within NASA and DARPA capability may have to remain restricted, as well as other science data may have to be need-to-know (same as the JAXA and ISRO missions). ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if(on Moon water) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 28 | December 6th 08 04:54 AM |
WATER WATER WATER FOR AUSTRALIA... HOPELESSLY PRAYING MR HOWARD | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 11th 07 10:57 AM |
Water on the moon or Mars, part-2, water on your brain, you torture for microsoft, don't you? | Matt Wiser | History | 0 | December 28th 05 07:12 AM |
Water on the moon or Mars, part-2, water on your brain, you torture for microsoft, don't you? | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 05 08:02 PM |
Moon Water | Joe Strout | Policy | 13 | January 17th 04 09:52 AM |