Modification using EUMETSAT

The alteration in the solar radiation/orbital shadow boundary,denoting
the slow change in orientation of the Earth through 360 degrees over
the course of an annual orbit can be seen from space -

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...0060317b_b.jpg

It is possible to split that change into latitudinal and longitudinal
components even though the change occurs simultaneously,the principle
one is for climatologiucal purposes in explaining global climate first
and then creating a subset of hemispherical seasons.

My interest is in the longitudinal component where the change in
orbital orientation allied with the axial cycle alters the observation
of natural noon in accordance with Keplerian orbital geometry.It has
nothing whatsoever to do with axial orientation or 'tilt'.

Of course, all this depends on isolating axial rotation and that
requires an interdisciplinary effort insofar as physical
considerations in climatological,geological or astronomical
disciplines seperately may not mesh with each other in one cohesive
package.

With images of the Earth from space,why waste time with concepts based
on variable axial inclination for either the seasons or a component in
the Equation of Time correction ?.This is astronomy and it is time
these efforts were not seen as being outside the system or having to
fight for them through an open forum.

On Sep 9, 12:37 pm, oriel36 wrote:
The alteration in the solar radiation/orbital shadow boundary,denoting
the slow change in orientation of the Earth through 360 degrees over
the course of an annual orbit can be seen from space -

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...images/pr20060...

It is possible to split that change into latitudinal and longitudinal
components even though the change occurs simultaneously,the principle
one is for climatologiucal purposes in explaining global climate first
and then creating a subset of hemispherical seasons.

My interest is in the longitudinal component where the change in
orbital orientation allied with the axial cycle alters the observation
of natural noon in accordance with Keplerian orbital geometry.It has
nothing whatsoever to do with axial orientation or 'tilt'.

Of course, all this depends on isolating axial rotation and that
requires an interdisciplinary effort insofar as physical
considerations in climatological,geological or astronomical
disciplines seperately may not mesh with each other in one cohesive
package.

With images of the Earth from space,why waste time with concepts based
on variable axial inclination for either the seasons or a component in
the Equation of Time correction ?.This is astronomy and it is time
these efforts were not seen as being outside the system or having to
fight for them through an open forum.

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...images/pr20060...

There is an awkward feature in the descriptions provided by those
images insofar as solstices are hemispherical terms whereas thew
Equinox is a truly global term.This awkward feature always surfaces in
descriptions of what causes the seasons,inavariably axialtilt and
angle of inclination of solar radiation -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuiQvPLWziQ

It is extraordinarily difficult to believe that even with images of
the Earth from space showing the the length of time a given
latitudinal location spends in solar radition and in the orbital
shadow is the main determining factor for the background for
hemispherical weather patterns (seasons) that climatologists would
still propose it in terms of the pseudo-dynamic of variable
inclination and the angle of inclination to solar radiation.

Are the photographs from Eumetsat not explicit enough to determine
that a rather large modification has to be applied to global climate
and the reason for the seasons ?.