Hawkings says humans close to finding origin of Universe

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...s_060615114727


Q: Do ocean waves have mass?

Consider a wave propagating across the surface of an ocean of water.

Clearly the medium (the water) in which the wave is travelling has
mass.

But would a physicist say that technically the wave itself has energy
but no mass? The reasoning being that mass is not being laterally
transported, but rather water molecules basically just oscillate in a
circle proportional to the wave size, or something like that.

Or in the case of water waves would the physicist say the wave has both

energy and mass?

Answers/opinions would be welcomed.


Thanks,
Rob


A: There is clear existence of relativity. Relativity means
that matter comes to life and forms its own Universe as an
independent little Universe. Imagine space as a Universal
sea, a Universe, and matter separates with all the needed
components from this Universe to form its own micro-universe.
This micro-universe inherits or releases energy, in otherwords
exchanges (energy). Matter can come from the larger
Universe (space) or annihilate back (not as light, but as a
Universal entity). The Universe is our reality, and it can integrate.
A micro-universe,once formed, merely gains structural
stability of its own, independently from the Universe at large.
There are conditions which allow the formation of sub-atomic
particles,and conditions which allow their conversion to
other dimensions. Mass is a relative phenomena which
correlates to/with relativistic energies. Waves exist as
fluctuations between the Universes, and these fluctuations
can trigger atomic (nuclear) and molecular bonds.

Einstein speculated that mass corresponds with energy,
but I have come to realize (with strong proofs) that mass
weakens in high gravitational fields.

See, there is this idea about mass, that you have a planet,
and the more matter you pour in this planet, the greater
it becomes, the stronger the gravity becomes on the
surface, and each object on the surface gains more mass.
So what I wrote above is a contradiction, because the law
of mass, applied to gravity seems to follow this simle
rule. That the larger the planet the more massive objects
become, as mass is weight, which corresponds to gravity.
So waves on the ocean may be more massive only due
to their size, but gravitation is not relevant in this case.

So rethink your question.

The dumbest people solve their problems with violence.
If nothing helps, you may solve it with a gun pointed
at MIT physicists.

By the way, very high gravitational fields weaken high
gravitational fields by setting matter into flows, motion,
the same way hurricanes, where mass accumulates sets the
large system into a swirling rotation. That's what I talked
with Michio Kaku, that in the center of spiraling galaxies,
a high gravitational swirling takes place with an eye in
the center, and not a solar object scientists currently
believe to exist in the nucleus of spiral galaxies like
the Milky Way. So instead of a black hole, an opening,
a possible white hole exists in the center of the
galaxy, where magnetic fields are repelling light and
electrons in two North and South polar directions
along the wall of the eye of the spiral galactic nucleus,
a place that gravitationally repells all matter to enter,
even light, and instead redirects matter gravitationally
and electromagnetically in the two polar direction in
a spiraling fashion. Mass and gravity can be solved.

DO NOT KILL ANYONE. It can be solved.