|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message
... On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:43:13 -0700, "And Justice For All" wrote: You are very welcome I am just trying to help with the Internet/Usenet aspect of this. ...Which is why you've posted this *twice*, once using your shame-wrought name, the other using this hypocritical alias. PLONK "privacy.net" my ass... OM Hi, www.privacy.net is actually a very cool website and a valid return email is produced. I have used it on the sci.* groups before. My apoligies for that. I don't normally post using my real name on any newsgroup. I make an exception for this science group though. I do not plan on posting here reguraly so I had changed back to the anonymous information on my OE account. I caught it, cancelled it and immeditely corrected it within seconds. It was not intentional and surely reasonable people will understand how that mistake could happen. Unreasonable people might make a huge issue of it but I won't be responding. I do apreciate you filtering me though. Now if I could just get you to stop posting my name daily this group would be a much better place. This is the end of my comms with you Bob there will not be any back and forth on this issue it was a mistake, they happen. There shouldn't be any reason for you to rehash this the focus of this post is the link below. http://www.beadjewelers.com/ladonna.htm P. Maxson |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"P. Maxson" wrote in message ...
"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:43:13 -0700, "And Justice For All" wrote: You are very welcome I am just trying to help with the Internet/Usenet aspect of this. ...Which is why you've posted this *twice*, once using your shame-wrought name, the other using this hypocritical alias. PLONK "privacy.net" my ass... OM Hi, www.privacy.net is actually a very cool website and a valid return email is produced. I have used it on the sci.* groups before. My apoligies for that. I don't normally post using my real name on any newsgroup. I make an exception for this science group though. I do not plan on posting here reguraly so I had changed back to the anonymous information on my OE account. I caught it, cancelled it and immeditely corrected it within seconds. It was not intentional and surely reasonable people will understand how that mistake could happen. Unreasonable people might make a huge issue of it but I won't be responding. I do apreciate you filtering me though. Now if I could just get you to stop posting my name daily this group would be a much better place. This is the end of my comms with you Bob there will not be any back and forth on this issue it was a mistake, they happen. There shouldn't be any reason for you to rehash this the focus of this post is the link below. http://www.beadjewelers.com/ladonna.htm P. Maxson By the way, I notice this thread has not been posted to in two days. I thought you folks were so hot on "verifiable references?" Well? Here are 100 documents, one of which is almost 50 pages long, and I don't see throngs of excited "fact-finders" checking them out. Could it be you folks are simply full of hot air? Nahhhhh, couldn't be. You must just be terribly busy. Yeah, that's it. I'm sure you'll get to it...eventually. Hee hee. LaDonna |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message m... I thought you folks were so hot on "verifiable references?" We're checking things out in order, and stopping when we've reached something you haven't provided verifiable references for. At the moment, that would be your "teammates" and the law enforcement officers you spoke to about Apollo 1. If you can't provide verifiable answers to those items, there's no reason to believe anything else you claim. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... You are NOT "checking things out in order," etc. At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you haven't provided anything verifiable. Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your next unsubstantiated claim. Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports your claims, and they'll go away. GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim. I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... You are NOT "checking things out in order," etc. At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you haven't provided anything verifiable. Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your next unsubstantiated claim. Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports your claims, and they'll go away. GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim. I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1. Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? Let's forget the FBI papers for a moment: At what time did Main B zero out for the first time the day of the fire? What part of the Plugs-Out Test was the crew conducting when communications first went south that afternoon? What is the electrical tie between the two? Of course you cannot answer. You're too busy coming up with lies, distortions, and red herrings. LaDonna |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... You are NOT "checking things out in order," etc. At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you haven't provided anything verifiable. Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your next unsubstantiated claim. Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports your claims, and they'll go away. GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim. I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1. Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? They didn't have any *verifiable* references to the law enforcement personnel you claim you spoke to, *or* verifiable information about your teammates. After those questions are answered, I'll be able to discuss your documents with you. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... You are NOT "checking things out in order," etc. At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you haven't provided anything verifiable. Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your next unsubstantiated claim. Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports your claims, and they'll go away. GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim. I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1. Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? They didn't have any *verifiable* references to the law enforcement personnel you claim you spoke to, *or* verifiable information about your teammates. After those questions are answered, I'll be able to discuss your documents with you. Translation: You haven't looked at any of it. BIG surprise. LaDonna |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... You are NOT "checking things out in order," etc. At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you haven't provided anything verifiable. Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your next unsubstantiated claim. Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports your claims, and they'll go away. GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim. I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1. Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? They didn't have any *verifiable* references to the law enforcement personnel you claim you spoke to, *or* verifiable information about your teammates. After those questions are answered, I'll be able to discuss your documents with you. Translation: You haven't answered any of it. Big surprise. You really don't get it: if you won't provide the information to allow such a small claim to be verified, it shows that you are a liar on everything else. Your own actions keep you from being taken seriously. Verifying your claim on this would boost your credibility everywhere else. The only reason for not providing the information is that it doesn't exist. Answer it or admit you lied and the question will go away. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om... Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? Let's forget the FBI papers for a moment: At what time did Main B zero out for the first time the day of the fire? What part of the Plugs-Out Test was the crew conducting when communications first went south that afternoon? What is the electrical tie between the two? Of course you cannot answer. You're too busy coming up with lies, distortions, and red herrings. Who are you trying to convince? Nobody on this NG is stupid enough to fall for your "right back at ya" tactic. Again: do you have the slightest concern for your credibility? **** like this doesn't help you *at all* -- Terrell Miller "Married men live longer than single men, but married men are a lot more willing to die." Proverb |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Terrell Miller" wrote in message .. .
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? Let's forget the FBI papers for a moment: At what time did Main B zero out for the first time the day of the fire? What part of the Plugs-Out Test was the crew conducting when communications first went south that afternoon? What is the electrical tie between the two? Of course you cannot answer. You're too busy coming up with lies, distortions, and red herrings. Who are you trying to convince? Nobody on this NG is stupid enough to fall for your "right back at ya" tactic. Again: do you have the slightest concern for your credibility? **** like this doesn't help you *at all* Hedrick is not WORTH a "real" answer. He's proven himself to have the mental and emotional age of about three, and I am insulting three-year-olds by saying so. LaDonna |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |