mean density of planets and satellites; #150; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory

Sorry, in my last post I neglected to include the three planets
Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. And I would argue that Pluto is
the next planet beyond Neptune since its distance spacing of
5 + 6^2 = 41 and actual 39.4 Au. So my formula would give
6 + 7^2 = 55 as the next planet beyond Pluto. So is there such
a astro-body?


Sun, average density 1.4 gm/cm^3 but core is 150 gm/cm^3 and where
core is equal to about 0.2 solar radii

MEAN DENSITIES

Mercury, 5.4 gm/cm^3, metal core is 42% of volume


Venus, 5.2 gm/cm^3, metallic core


Earth, 5.5 gm/cm^3, metal core 17% volume


Moon, 3.3 gm/cm^3, iron core


Mars, 3.9 gm/cm^3, iron sulfide core


---------
Jupiter, 1.3 gm/cm^3, rocky core that is 12-45 Earth
mass and 3 to 15% of Jupiter's total mass


Saturn, 0.7 gm/cm^3, (less dense than water), rocky
core 9 to 22 times Earth mass

Uranus, 1.2 gm/cm^3, rock core

Neptune, 1.6 gm/cm^3, rock core of iron, nickel, silicates

Pluto, 2.1 gm/cm^3, rock core


--------
Satellites of Jupiter:


Io, 3.5 gm/cm^3, iron core


Europa, 3.0 gm/cm^3, iron core


Ganymede, 1.9 gm/cm^3, Fe and FeS iron core


Callisto, 1.8 gm/cm^3, silicate core


_____


Saturn satellite


Titan, 1.8 gm/cm^3 silicate core


I have this feeling that the proof of the Atom Totality theory is
easiest and best done here in our own backyard. Backyard
meaning our Solar System. People, even highly trained scientists are
suspicious of "proof from faraway." Stars and galaxies lightyears
away, have a tougher time of convincing us
of the truth of the universe. But when we have proof in our
Solar System, that the Nebular Dust Cloud NDC theory could
not possibly give the cores of the planets and satellites and give
their distance spacings. And that is really good proof.

If the NDC theory cannot explain our Solar System but that the
Dirac new-radioactivities does explain our Solar System, means
that the Atom Totality theory is the true theory.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Aug 16, 1:07*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
Sorry, in my last post I neglected to include the three planets
Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. And I would argue that Pluto is
the next planet beyond Neptune since its distance spacing of
5 + 6^2 = 41 and actual 39.4 Au. So my formula would give
6 + 7^2 = 55 as the next planet beyond Pluto. So is there such
a astro-body?

Sun, average density 1.4 gm/cm^3 but core is 150 gm/cm^3 and where
core is equal to about 0.2 solar radii

MEAN DENSITIES

Mercury, 5.4 gm/cm^3, metal core is 42% of volume

Venus, 5.2 gm/cm^3, metallic core

Earth, 5.5 gm/cm^3, metal core 17% volume

Moon, 3.3 gm/cm^3, iron core

Mars, 3.9 gm/cm^3, iron sulfide core

---------
Jupiter, 1.3 gm/cm^3, rocky core that is 12-45 Earth
mass and 3 to 15% of Jupiter's total mass

Saturn, 0.7 gm/cm^3, (less dense than water), rocky
core 9 to 22 times Earth mass

Uranus, 1.2 gm/cm^3, rock core

Neptune, 1.6 gm/cm^3, rock core of iron, nickel, silicates

Pluto, 2.1 gm/cm^3, rock core

--------
Satellites of Jupiter:

Io, 3.5 gm/cm^3, iron core

Europa, 3.0 gm/cm^3, iron core

Ganymede, 1.9 gm/cm^3, Fe and FeS iron core

Callisto, 1.8 gm/cm^3, silicate core

_____

Saturn satellite

Titan, 1.8 gm/cm^3 silicate core

I have this feeling that the proof of the Atom Totality theory is
easiest and best done here in our own backyard. Backyard
meaning our Solar System. People, even highly trained scientists are
suspicious of "proof from faraway." Stars and galaxies lightyears
away, have a tougher time of convincing us
of the truth of the universe. But when we have proof in our
Solar System, that the Nebular Dust Cloud NDC theory could
not possibly give the cores of the planets and satellites and give
their distance spacings. And that is really good proof.

If the NDC theory cannot explain our Solar System but that the
Dirac new-radioactivities does explain our Solar System, means
that the Atom Totality theory is the true theory.

If dogs would just **** square bricks, we could pile them all up and
have a nice little house.

Gus Richter
Well Driller
Victoria, Texas
1967

On Aug 16, 2:07*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:

If the NDC theory cannot explain our Solar System but that the
Dirac new-radioactivities does explain our Solar System, means
that the Atom Totality theory is the true theory.

Not true. There are many possible alternatives the likes of which you
are apparently unfamiliar with.