#1
|
|||
|
|||
The nine planets
This is just plain funny !.
http://www.nineplanets.org/ I enjoy seeing the astrophotographers trying to play with 8 planets and supporting the theorists who put a stop to the pathetic attempt to 'define' a planet.The proper feeling should be irritation,even for astrophotographers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The nine planets
oriel36 ha escrito: This is just plain funny !. http://www.nineplanets.org/ I enjoy seeing the astrophotographers trying to play with 8 planets and supporting the theorists who put a stop to the pathetic attempt to 'define' a planet.The proper feeling should be irritation,even for astrophotographers. Mr. Kelleher still showing why he is my favorite crackpot |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The nine planets
I love you website Eugene and especially your correct identification
for axial rotation at 15 degrees per hour,it will not get you invited to any star parties by the celestial sphere astrologers but who needs them. Now Eugene,there is nothing worse than a miserable coward so you go right on ahead and include your website when you post. "Imagine the earth as a large orange. Slice the peel into gores as if you were about to peel it. These "slices" equate to the lines of longitude. Longitude is a "man made" measure insofar that the line from which all longitude is measured is the line that runs through the old naval observatory in Greenwich. Longitudinal distances are related to time and every 15° is the distance the earth rotates in one hour." http://www.dynagen.co.za/eugene/where/index.html Eugene Griessel wrote: wrote: oriel36 ha escrito: This is just plain funny !. http://www.nineplanets.org/ I enjoy seeing the astrophotographers trying to play with 8 planets and supporting the theorists who put a stop to the pathetic attempt to 'define' a planet.The proper feeling should be irritation,even for astrophotographers. Mr. Kelleher still showing why he is my favorite crackpot That's if he isn't just a bot with a set of randomly selected boilerplate scripts. Every post he makes fails the Turing test. Eugene L Griessel Brainpower is the world's scarcest commodity, and the only one of any real intrinsic value. Any human organisation can be rendered useless, impotent, a danger to itself, by selectively removing its best minds while carefully leaving its stupid ones in place. Stupid fools look just like geniuses until the fighting starts. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The nine planets
wrote: oriel36 ha escrito: This is just plain funny !. http://www.nineplanets.org/ I enjoy seeing the astrophotographers trying to play with 8 planets and supporting the theorists who put a stop to the pathetic attempt to 'define' a planet.The proper feeling should be irritation,even for astrophotographers. Mr. Kelleher still showing why he is my favorite crackpot The same thinking which suddenly appeared to demote the status of Pluto as a planet is the same thinking which cannot even manage to give the correct value for the rotation of the Earth on its axis,the most fundamental correlation of all - 24 hours/360 degrees. How many irritated astrophotographers out there trying to absorb an uneccessary and meaningless 'definitional' episode in planetary demotion.It just goes to show how physical objects mean nothing to the theorists and no doubt,even astrophotographers here will squirm uncomfortably with the forced absence of Pluto as a planet. I only wish an abrupt change in direction was possible with the most fundamental correlation of all through the easy to comprehend Equation of Time correction,its pre-Copernican form in creating the 24 hour day and its heliocentric adaption to axial rotation at 15 degrees per hour.The two step process is one the greatest human achievements known and none of you appreciate it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The nine planets
In article .com,
oriel36 wrote: The same thinking which suddenly appeared to demote the status of Pluto as a planet is the same thinking which cannot even manage to give the correct value for the rotation of the Earth on its axis,the most fundamental correlation of all - 24 hours/360 degrees. You should indeed feel a natural affinity for those who think that the number of planets is of great importance. Whether there are 8 or 9 or 12 is a question of the same type as whether 24 hours is the period of the earth's rotation or the interval at which a given point faces the sun: a matter of convention, nothing more. -- Richard |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The nine planets
Richard Tobin wrote: In article .com, oriel36 wrote: The same thinking which suddenly appeared to demote the status of Pluto as a planet is the same thinking which cannot even manage to give the correct value for the rotation of the Earth on its axis,the most fundamental correlation of all - 24 hours/360 degrees. You should indeed feel a natural affinity for those who think that the number of planets is of great importance. Whether there are 8 or 9 or 12 is a question of the same type as whether 24 hours is the period of the earth's rotation or the interval at which a given point faces the sun: a matter of convention, nothing more. -- Richard Celestial sphere geometers justify the return of a star to a meridian in 23 hours 56 min 04 sec by using the axial and orbital motion of the Earth making it a geometric exercise and this suits me fine - http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/JennyChen.shtml Considering that a star's return to a meridian works in a system where there are 3 years of 365 days and 1 year of 366 days should alert intelligent people to the fact that it is a catastrophic way to justify axial and orbital motion in the context of an annual cycle. The casual pseudo-authority of 'definitional ' conventions are fine however in matters of astronomical justications using geometry you get to highlight yourself as a celestial sphere geometer - http://www.opencourse.info/astronomy...phere_anim.gif The system behind the Earth rotation at 15 degrees per hour is a exquisite two step process with the Equation of Time correction straddling its pre-Copernican origins and its heliocentric adaption to axial rotation as a principle.Technically and geometrically affirming something is hardly superseded by worthless conventions and definitions and I suggest you start recognising the astronomical heritage which generated the 24 hour system first and then applied it to axial rotation when that motion was infered by Copernicus. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soon 12 planets in the solar system ! | Amateur Astronomy | 108 | August 24th 06 06:29 AM | |
[sci.astro] Solar System (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (5/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:34 PM |
New Theory on How Planets Form Finds Havens of Stability Amid Turbulence | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 14th 05 05:55 AM |
How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) | greywolf42 | Astronomy Misc | 7 | November 19th 04 11:23 PM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Misc | 5 | August 10th 03 10:58 PM |