|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I could not find a GR prediction for Binary Stars PSR J1518+4904 and B2303+46 during my research. I guess that means GR gives a correct prediction . The GR prediction for V541 Cygni is clearly incorrect. See article below: http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/...0293.text.html Also consider the research article by Ed Guninan who was the first to bring GR's predicted error to the Astronomy community. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AAS...21541934Z There are still many questions that need to be answered with respect to DI Herculis and any attempt to apply the same analysis to other binary stars as a solution. Ed Guninan research is very significant too and does not simply say, "solved" no more questions. In fact, he suggest the that axis has undergone precession. This is interesting because my research shows that in some configurations precession can change over time or flux. Kepler defined orbits as closed, fixed elliptical orbits. Einstein proved the orbits are open and rotates or undergoes precession. I showed that the precession is also unstable within a potential of possible precessions. My research and comments are not presented to change anyones perspective. Perspective is just a lens through which we interpret the facts. If one believes GR is flawless then we can just disregard any facts to the contrary. If one believes GR is worthless then we can just disregard any facts to the contrary. I believe GR and Newtonian Mechanics are the best theories we have for how objects move under the influence of gravity. I also believe there are objects in the universe whose motion cannot be explain completely with a gravitational field theory alone. This ultimately requires a theory which interfaces gravity and electronmagnetism using quantum structures. That is what I presented in, "Binary Precession Solutions based on Synchronized Field Couplings". Last edited by Jamahl Peavey : September 19th 11 at 04:52 PM. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
8/30/11 - No Quantum Gravity Signature
[_2_ Wrote:
;1174692']Jamahl Peavey wrote:- Eric Gisse;1172180 Wrote: - On Sep 1, 3:25*pm, Jamahl Peavey Jamahl.Peavey. wrote:--- [...]-- There are many conflicting observations related to GR and you do not have to go to black holes to get them. * *Many binary stars have motions that are not consistent with GR. *DI Herculis was the first and recent discoveries show it's not the last. *Yeah, MIT researches tried to explain DI Herculis but when the new parameters were applied GR's error dropped by only 50%. -- No, only about 10%, which is well within the noise. See Claret et al., Astronomy&Astrophysics 515 (2010), article ID A4. The preprint is http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2949. [...]- In addition to DI Herculis, GR gets the precessions for the binary systems below wrong as well. - - PSR J1518 +4904- Reference? ADS shows one paper on measurements specifically of this system, Janssen et al., A&A 490 (2008) 753, which finds no problem. - B2303 + 46- Reference? Again, I can find no such claim in any of the recent papers on this object in ADS. - V541 Cygni- Volkov and Khaliullin, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4680, 1, find no discrepancy. - As Camelopardalis- Not clear -- see Pavlovski et al., ApJL 734 (2011) L29. As in DI Her, the rotations are misaligned. Steve Carlip The thread is about issues related to quantum gravity, so I am reluctant to continue the discussion about GR which unlike quantum gravitational models is proven. With that in mind, I would like to address GR for the last time. I could not find a GR prediction for Binary Stars PSR J1518+4904 and B2303+46 during my research. I guess that means GR gives a correct prediction ... The GR prediction for V541 Cygni is clearly incorrect. See article below: http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/...0293.text.html Also consider the research article by Ed Guninan who was the first to bring GR's predicted error to the Astronomy community. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AAS...21541934Z There are still many questions that need to be answered with respect to DI Herculis and any attempt to apply the same analysis to other binary stars as a solution. Ed Guninan research is very significant too and does not simply say, "solved" no more questions. My research and comments are not presented to change anyones perspective. Perspective is just a lens through which we interpret the facts. If one believes GR is flawless then we can just disregard any facts to the contrary. If one believes GR is worthless then we can just disregard any facts to the contrary. I believe GR and Newtonian Mechanics are the best theories we have for how objects move under the influence of gravity. I also believe there are objects in the universe whose motion cannot be explain completely with a gravitational field theory alone. This ultimately requires a theory which interfaces gravity and electronmagnetism using quantum structures. That is what I presented in, "Binary Precession Solutions based on Synchronized Field Couplings". -- Jamahl Peavey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quantum Gravity 240.5: Quantum Gravity "Demolished" At Universityof Oregon USA | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 1st 08 03:12 PM |
How Much Help does EM give to Quantum Gravity ??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | March 24th 08 09:48 PM |
Topics in Quantum Gravity 1 | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 07 01:57 AM |
Quantum Gravity Topics 1 | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 20th 07 03:43 AM |
Quantum Gravity? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 4 | June 11th 05 08:42 PM |