How cool is VL2

On Apr 2, 6:15 am, wrote:
Nice folks these born-again via incest cloned borgs of the Third
Reich, and mostly Jewish to boot.

What's alt.snuh?
-
Brad Guth

And the cesspool of all that's MI/NSA~NASA is still flowing nicely up
hill, just as though it had some special Jewish powers within all of
its infomercial spewed crapolla.
-
Brad Guth

Venus L2 is in fact cool to the naked touch. However, Venus itself is
not the least bit too hot to touch with the Ovglove. That is as long
as you don't run yourself out of ice cold beer and pizza, in that I
really don't see all that much of a problem.

As long as you've got way more spare/renewable energy at your disposal
than you could possibly know what to do with, and having that nifty
thermal suit made by Ovglove, where's the big-ass insurmountable
problem with taking that hot-foot of a toasty stroll on Venus?

CO2--CO/O2 is not hardly a technical problem, hasn't been for a good
decade or more.

Pure H2O as easily extracted from those somewhat cool nighttime acidic
clouds (above the S8 layer) is simply another mission positive win-
win.

The 65 kg/m3 worth of buoyancy as working along with the 90.5% gravity
is offering a couple of other nifty factors that'll work rather well
for your composite rigid airship (just like on behalf of those
Venusian composite rigid airships).

If you're any damn good at PhotoShop, goto:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
or best you start with your very own look-see at the following
official image site:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

The 36 look per pixel of that primary GIF image format starts getting
downright interesting at being 3X resampled, and then giving it all
the best PhotoShop or whatever else you can muster, although the
original GIF 1:1 image was actually good enough for my PhotoShop
configured brain to deductively interpret upon what's most likely
artificial as opposed to what's perfectly natural. 36 looks per pixel
is offering a lot of truthworthy image data to start with, so it's a
good one to stick with rather than dealing with their individual 75
meter/pixel versions as having combined but four looks per pixel.

Don't try to process the entire image unless you've got one heck of a
nifty PC or MAC. Try clipping out only the small portion of the total
image that's roughly a third up from the bottom and just to the right
of center, as we're talking about utilizing less than 10% or perhaps
even as little as 5% of that primary GIF image, and to process upon
just that much shouldn't traumatise your memory or performance PC or
MAC.

I'll review each of your results, that by rights should become a whole
lot better than mine. Obviously anyone can over/under force those
PhotoShop refinements, well past the point of no return, so don't do
that. My extremely old version of PhotoShop can't hardly accomplish
much better than 8X resampling without losing ground, and besides, we
don't actually require much better than 6X for most others to see most
clearly what I'd first interpreted from the original 1:1 format.

Thanks once again to 'tomcat' for also having posted this updated page
of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

It's image No.17 from the top left being the one that so happens to
include the robust, sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH
Venus'.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif
-
Brad Guth

In article .com,
wrote:

Venus L2 is in fact cool to the naked touch

Only on bizarro-world.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On Apr 4, 5:21 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article .com,

wrote:
Venus L2 is in fact cool to the naked touch

Only on bizarro-world.

I got less than 400 w/m2, and your VL2 solar isolation
is ?????????????
-
Brad Guth

In article .com,
wrote:

I got less

clue then a braindead lemming?

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
news
In article .com,
wrote:

I got less

clue then a braindead lemming?

Are you and others of your silly kind having another bad jewboy day?

As otherwise VL2 is in fact cool, and Venus itself isn't worse off than
what a good Ovglove body-suit could safely manage.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

In article
lgate.org,
"Brad Guth" wrote:

Are you and others

tired of reading your screed? Why yes.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

OOPS! Now I've gone and insulted the Ovgolve cult of mindless
morons. Sorry about that.

Perhaps Venus is simply too freaking hot to touch, even with the
Ovglove.

Within an average of having been losing 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 1e16 watts
continuously available at the core), represents that some areas of the
Venus surface are perhaps worth less than a w/m2, with other areas
radiating at perhaps 200 w/m2, and of course more than a few active
mud, lava and gas vents contributing their energy at many thousands of
watts per square meter.

So, the Ovglove applications are at best spotty, and along with the IR
CCD or most likely using of some other thermally tolerant instrument
of such technology at hand, there's no good reason to think of our
having to walk on those extra toasty locations where the heat of
what's geothermally forced is excessively pushing the limits of those
EVA Ovglove suits as intended and thus configured for keeping their
folks cool.

Technically it is much tougher to get rid of surplus heat than it is
for insulating yourself from the cold. However, the double IR/FIR
environment of our daytime moon that's physically dark and nasty in
more ways than passive heat, such as for benefiting those sorts of
robust robotic instruments that'll have to survive the solar IR plus
all of the locally reflected IR and of the secondary/recoil worth of
the mid and far infrared(FIR), should more than apply to this
application of such robotics and perhaps a few brave souls safely
accomplishing Venus. In fact the moon's secondary/recoil worth of
what's near, mid and far infrared combined is likely worth every bit
as much as the solar influx, though fortunately our Venus surface by
season of nighttime is without solar IR to begin with, and even by day
there's not all that much solar IR that ever reaches that S8 and
acidic h2o cloud protected surface.

There's obviously more to behold and appreciate about all the NIR, MIF
and FIR spectrums of our universe than there is from our biologically
limited if not evolution deprived visual spectrum (there are bugs,
more than a few other significant species including birds that
actually see much better than us humans)
http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/Outreach...irregions.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared

Our seeing by night while exploring or otherwise doing our business of
depositing or extracting whatever from Venus is not the least bit of a
compromise, or is it outside of most any thermal environment spec.
Cruising Venus by way of a suitable composite rigid airship is just
downright nifty, and rather energy efficient to boot.
-
Brad Guth

In article . com,
wrote:

OOPS! Now I've gone

and posted more screed?

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On Apr 5, 3:13 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article . com,

wrote:
OOPS! Now I've gone

and posted more screed?


You've hit the magic #69

I'm not exactly sure; is that good or bad?
-
Brad Guth